How Far Are We From AGI
2405.10313
13
0
Abstract
The evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) has profoundly impacted human society, driving significant advancements in multiple sectors. Yet, the escalating demands on AI have highlighted the limitations of AI's current offerings, catalyzing a movement towards Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). AGI, distinguished by its ability to execute diverse real-world tasks with efficiency and effectiveness comparable to human intelligence, reflects a paramount milestone in AI evolution. While existing works have summarized specific recent advancements of AI, they lack a comprehensive discussion of AGI's definitions, goals, and developmental trajectories. Different from existing survey papers, this paper delves into the pivotal questions of our proximity to AGI and the strategies necessary for its realization through extensive surveys, discussions, and original perspectives. We start by articulating the requisite capability frameworks for AGI, integrating the internal, interface, and system dimensions. As the realization of AGI requires more advanced capabilities and adherence to stringent constraints, we further discuss necessary AGI alignment technologies to harmonize these factors. Notably, we emphasize the importance of approaching AGI responsibly by first defining the key levels of AGI progression, followed by the evaluation framework that situates the status-quo, and finally giving our roadmap of how to reach the pinnacle of AGI. Moreover, to give tangible insights into the ubiquitous impact of the integration of AI, we outline existing challenges and potential pathways toward AGI in multiple domains. In sum, serving as a pioneering exploration into the current state and future trajectory of AGI, this paper aims to foster a collective comprehension and catalyze broader public discussions among researchers and practitioners on AGI.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Provides a historical overview of AI development
- Explores the desire for general-purpose AI
- Discusses the current state of AI and how close we are to achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI)
- Identifies key challenges and barriers that must be overcome to reach AGI
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses the history and current state of artificial intelligence (AI) research, with a focus on the pursuit of general-purpose AI, also known as artificial general intelligence (AGI).
The authors trace the development of AI from its early origins to the present day, highlighting key milestones and breakthroughs. They note the longstanding desire of researchers and the public to create an AI system that can perform a wide range of tasks, much like the human mind, rather than specialized AI systems designed for specific applications.
However, the paper suggests that we are still a significant distance away from achieving true AGI. The authors identify several major challenges that must be overcome, such as the need for better understanding of human cognition, advances in machine learning and reasoning, and the development of more robust and flexible AI architectures.
The paper emphasizes that while impressive progress has been made in narrow AI domains, creating a truly general-purpose AI system that can match the breadth and flexibility of the human mind remains an elusive goal. Significant further research and innovation will be required to bridge the gap between current AI capabilities and the vision of artificial general intelligence.
Technical Explanation
The paper provides a historical overview of the development of artificial intelligence (AI), tracing its origins from the early days of computer science to the present-day advancements in machine learning and neural networks.
The authors highlight the longstanding desire of researchers and the public to create a general-purpose AI system that can perform a wide range of tasks, similar to the human mind, rather than the specialized AI systems designed for specific applications.
The paper then examines the current state of AI research and the challenges that must be overcome to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). The authors identify several key barriers, including:
- The need for a better understanding of human cognition and how the brain processes information.
- The limitations of current machine learning and reasoning techniques, which often struggle with tasks that require flexible, contextual problem-solving.
- The difficulty in developing AI architectures that can seamlessly integrate various cognitive capabilities, such as perception, reasoning, memory, and language processing.
The paper also discusses the impressive progress made in narrow AI domains, such as image recognition, game-playing, and language processing. However, the authors emphasize that these specialized systems, while powerful, are still far from achieving the broad, flexible intelligence of the human mind.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful and well-researched overview of the current state of AI research and the challenges that must be overcome to reach artificial general intelligence. The authors acknowledge the significant progress made in narrow AI domains, but they rightly point out that creating a truly general-purpose AI system remains an elusive goal.
One potential limitation of the paper is that it does not delve deeply into the specific technical and scientific barriers that need to be addressed. While the authors mention the need for better understanding of human cognition, advances in machine learning, and more robust AI architectures, they could have provided more detail on the current state of research in these areas and the specific roadblocks that scientists are working to overcome.
Additionally, the paper could have explored the ethical and societal implications of achieving AGI, as the development of such a transformative technology would undoubtedly have far-reaching consequences for humanity. Addressing these concerns could have provided a more holistic perspective on the challenges and considerations involved in the pursuit of general-purpose AI.
Conclusion
The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the history and current state of AI research, with a particular focus on the longstanding goal of achieving artificial general intelligence. While impressive progress has been made in narrow AI domains, the authors make a compelling case that we are still a significant distance away from creating a truly general-purpose AI system that can match the breadth and flexibility of the human mind.
The paper identifies several key challenges that must be overcome, including the need for better understanding of human cognition, advances in machine learning and reasoning, and the development of more robust and flexible AI architectures. Addressing these barriers will require sustained research and innovation in the years to come.
As the pursuit of artificial general intelligence continues, this paper provides a valuable perspective on the current state of the field and the work that remains to be done to achieve this ambitious goal.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🎯
Levels of AGI for Operationalizing Progress on the Path to AGI
Meredith Ringel Morris, Jascha Sohl-dickstein, Noah Fiedel, Tris Warkentin, Allan Dafoe, Aleksandra Faust, Clement Farabet, Shane Legg
0
0
We propose a framework for classifying the capabilities and behavior of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) models and their precursors. This framework introduces levels of AGI performance, generality, and autonomy, providing a common language to compare models, assess risks, and measure progress along the path to AGI. To develop our framework, we analyze existing definitions of AGI, and distill six principles that a useful ontology for AGI should satisfy. With these principles in mind, we propose Levels of AGI based on depth (performance) and breadth (generality) of capabilities, and reflect on how current systems fit into this ontology. We discuss the challenging requirements for future benchmarks that quantify the behavior and capabilities of AGI models against these levels. Finally, we discuss how these levels of AGI interact with deployment considerations such as autonomy and risk, and emphasize the importance of carefully selecting Human-AI Interaction paradigms for responsible and safe deployment of highly capable AI systems.
6/7/2024
🚀
Position: Stop Making Unscientific AGI Performance Claims
Patrick Altmeyer, Andrew M. Demetriou, Antony Bartlett, Cynthia C. S. Liem
0
0
Developments in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI), and particularly large language models (LLMs), have created a 'perfect storm' for observing 'sparks' of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) that are spurious. Like simpler models, LLMs distill meaningful representations in their latent embeddings that have been shown to correlate with external variables. Nonetheless, the correlation of such representations has often been linked to human-like intelligence in the latter but not the former. We probe models of varying complexity including random projections, matrix decompositions, deep autoencoders and transformers: all of them successfully distill information that can be used to predict latent or external variables and yet none of them have previously been linked to AGI. We argue and empirically demonstrate that the finding of meaningful patterns in latent spaces of models cannot be seen as evidence in favor of AGI. Additionally, we review literature from the social sciences that shows that humans are prone to seek such patterns and anthropomorphize. We conclude that both the methodological setup and common public image of AI are ideal for the misinterpretation that correlations between model representations and some variables of interest are 'caused' by the model's understanding of underlying 'ground truth' relationships. We, therefore, call for the academic community to exercise extra caution, and to be keenly aware of principles of academic integrity, in interpreting and communicating about AI research outcomes.
6/3/2024
🤔
Unsocial Intelligence: an Investigation of the Assumptions of AGI Discourse
Borhane Blili-Hamelin, Leif Hancox-Li, Andrew Smart
0
0
Dreams of machines rivaling human intelligence have shaped the field of AI since its inception. Yet, the very meaning of human-level AI or artificial general intelligence (AGI) remains elusive and contested. Definitions of AGI embrace a diverse range of incompatible values and assumptions. Contending with the fractured worldviews of AGI discourse is vital for critiques that pursue different values and futures. To that end, we provide a taxonomy of AGI definitions, laying the ground for examining the key social, political, and ethical assumptions they make. We highlight instances in which these definitions frame AGI or human-level AI as a technical topic and expose the value-laden choices being implicitly made. Drawing on feminist, STS, and social science scholarship on the political and social character of intelligence in both humans and machines, we propose contextual, democratic, and participatory paths to imagining future forms of machine intelligence. The development of future forms of AI must involve explicit attention to the values it encodes, the people it includes or excludes, and a commitment to epistemic justice.
5/16/2024
🔎
A social path to human-like artificial intelligence
Edgar A. Du'e~nez-Guzm'an, Suzanne Sadedin, Jane X. Wang, Kevin R. McKee, Joel Z. Leibo
0
0
Traditionally, cognitive and computer scientists have viewed intelligence solipsistically, as a property of unitary agents devoid of social context. Given the success of contemporary learning algorithms, we argue that the bottleneck in artificial intelligence (AI) progress is shifting from data assimilation to novel data generation. We bring together evidence showing that natural intelligence emerges at multiple scales in networks of interacting agents via collective living, social relationships and major evolutionary transitions, which contribute to novel data generation through mechanisms such as population pressures, arms races, Machiavellian selection, social learning and cumulative culture. Many breakthroughs in AI exploit some of these processes, from multi-agent structures enabling algorithms to master complex games like Capture-The-Flag and StarCraft II, to strategic communication in Diplomacy and the shaping of AI data streams by other AIs. Moving beyond a solipsistic view of agency to integrate these mechanisms suggests a path to human-like compounding innovation through ongoing novel data generation.
5/28/2024