What is Meant by AGI? On the Definition of Artificial General Intelligence
2404.10731
0
0
📉
Abstract
This paper aims to establish a consensus on AGI's definition. General intelligence refers to the adaptation to open environments according to certain principles using limited resources. It emphasizes that adaptation or learning is an indispensable property of intelligence, and places the controversial part within the principles of intelligence, which can be described from different perspectives.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper discusses the definition of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and what it means for a system to be considered "generally intelligent."
- The authors explore the historical context and evolving perspectives on AGI, as well as the key attributes and capabilities that are often associated with this concept.
- The paper aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of AGI and the ongoing debate around its definition, which is crucial as the field of artificial intelligence continues to advance.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines the term "Artificial General Intelligence" (AGI) and what it means for an AI system to be considered "generally intelligent." AGI is a concept that has been discussed and debated in the field of AI for many years.
The authors trace the historical origins and evolution of the AGI concept, looking at how it has been understood and defined over time. They explore the key characteristics and capabilities that are often associated with AGI, such as the ability to learn and adapt across a wide range of tasks, to reason abstractly, and to demonstrate human-like intelligence.
The paper aims to provide a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of AGI, which is crucial as the field of AI continues to advance and the possibility of developing truly "general" AI systems becomes more tangible. This is an important topic as researchers and the public grapple with the implications of increasingly capable AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing historical context on the concept of AGI, tracing its origins back to the early days of AI research in the 1950s and 60s. The authors examine how the definition and understanding of AGI has evolved over time, with different researchers and thinkers emphasizing various aspects of what it means for an AI system to be "generally intelligent."
The paper then delves into a more detailed discussion of the key attributes and capabilities that are often associated with AGI. These include the ability to learn and adapt across a wide range of tasks, to reason abstractly and form general concepts, to understand and use natural language, and to demonstrate human-like intelligence in areas such as problem-solving, decision-making, and creativity. The authors also explore the interplay between these different capabilities and how they might be achieved in AI systems.
Throughout the paper, the authors acknowledge the ongoing debate and lack of consensus around the precise definition of AGI. They note that as the field of AI continues to advance, the question of what it means for a system to be "generally intelligent" has become increasingly complex and multifaceted.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and nuanced exploration of the AGI concept, but it also acknowledges the inherent challenges and uncertainties surrounding its definition. The authors recognize that there is no universally accepted definition of AGI, and that different researchers and thinkers may emphasize different aspects of what it means for an AI system to be "generally intelligent."
One potential limitation of the paper is that it does not delve deeply into the practical implications and challenges of developing AGI systems. While the authors touch on the importance of this topic as AI advances, they do not explore in detail the technical, ethical, and societal considerations that would come into play in the pursuit of AGI.
Additionally, the paper could have more strongly emphasized the ongoing debate and various perspectives on the AGI concept, rather than presenting a more unified view. Highlighting the nuances and disagreements within the AI community could have added depth and nuance to the discussion.
Overall, the paper provides a valuable contribution to the understanding of AGI and the evolving definition of this important concept in the field of artificial intelligence.
Conclusion
This paper offers a comprehensive exploration of the Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) concept, tracing its historical origins and examining the key attributes and capabilities often associated with it. The authors acknowledge the ongoing debate and lack of consensus around the precise definition of AGI, highlighting the complexities and challenges of this topic as the field of AI continues to advance.
The paper's thorough examination of the AGI concept is crucial as researchers, policymakers, and the public grapple with the implications of increasingly capable AI systems and the prospect of developing truly "general" AI. While the paper could have delved deeper into the practical and societal considerations surrounding AGI, it nevertheless provides a valuable contribution to the understanding of this important and evolving concept in the field of artificial intelligence.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤔
Unsocial Intelligence: an Investigation of the Assumptions of AGI Discourse
Borhane Blili-Hamelin, Leif Hancox-Li, Andrew Smart
0
0
Dreams of machines rivaling human intelligence have shaped the field of AI since its inception. Yet, the very meaning of human-level AI or artificial general intelligence (AGI) remains elusive and contested. Definitions of AGI embrace a diverse range of incompatible values and assumptions. Contending with the fractured worldviews of AGI discourse is vital for critiques that pursue different values and futures. To that end, we provide a taxonomy of AGI definitions, laying the ground for examining the key social, political, and ethical assumptions they make. We highlight instances in which these definitions frame AGI or human-level AI as a technical topic and expose the value-laden choices being implicitly made. Drawing on feminist, STS, and social science scholarship on the political and social character of intelligence in both humans and machines, we propose contextual, democratic, and participatory paths to imagining future forms of machine intelligence. The development of future forms of AI must involve explicit attention to the values it encodes, the people it includes or excludes, and a commitment to epistemic justice.
5/16/2024
How Far Are We From AGI
Tao Feng, Chuanyang Jin, Jingyu Liu, Kunlun Zhu, Haoqin Tu, Zirui Cheng, Guanyu Lin, Jiaxuan You
0
0
The evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) has profoundly impacted human society, driving significant advancements in multiple sectors. Yet, the escalating demands on AI have highlighted the limitations of AI's current offerings, catalyzing a movement towards Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). AGI, distinguished by its ability to execute diverse real-world tasks with efficiency and effectiveness comparable to human intelligence, reflects a paramount milestone in AI evolution. While existing works have summarized specific recent advancements of AI, they lack a comprehensive discussion of AGI's definitions, goals, and developmental trajectories. Different from existing survey papers, this paper delves into the pivotal questions of our proximity to AGI and the strategies necessary for its realization through extensive surveys, discussions, and original perspectives. We start by articulating the requisite capability frameworks for AGI, integrating the internal, interface, and system dimensions. As the realization of AGI requires more advanced capabilities and adherence to stringent constraints, we further discuss necessary AGI alignment technologies to harmonize these factors. Notably, we emphasize the importance of approaching AGI responsibly by first defining the key levels of AGI progression, followed by the evaluation framework that situates the status-quo, and finally giving our roadmap of how to reach the pinnacle of AGI. Moreover, to give tangible insights into the ubiquitous impact of the integration of AI, we outline existing challenges and potential pathways toward AGI in multiple domains. In sum, serving as a pioneering exploration into the current state and future trajectory of AGI, this paper aims to foster a collective comprehension and catalyze broader public discussions among researchers and practitioners on AGI.
5/17/2024
🎯
Levels of AGI for Operationalizing Progress on the Path to AGI
Meredith Ringel Morris, Jascha Sohl-dickstein, Noah Fiedel, Tris Warkentin, Allan Dafoe, Aleksandra Faust, Clement Farabet, Shane Legg
0
0
We propose a framework for classifying the capabilities and behavior of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) models and their precursors. This framework introduces levels of AGI performance, generality, and autonomy, providing a common language to compare models, assess risks, and measure progress along the path to AGI. To develop our framework, we analyze existing definitions of AGI, and distill six principles that a useful ontology for AGI should satisfy. With these principles in mind, we propose Levels of AGI based on depth (performance) and breadth (generality) of capabilities, and reflect on how current systems fit into this ontology. We discuss the challenging requirements for future benchmarks that quantify the behavior and capabilities of AGI models against these levels. Finally, we discuss how these levels of AGI interact with deployment considerations such as autonomy and risk, and emphasize the importance of carefully selecting Human-AI Interaction paradigms for responsible and safe deployment of highly capable AI systems.
6/7/2024
✅
Development of an Adaptive Multi-Domain Artificial Intelligence System Built using Machine Learning and Expert Systems Technologies
Jeremy Straub
0
0
Producing an artificial general intelligence (AGI) has been an elusive goal in artificial intelligence (AI) research for some time. An AGI would have the capability, like a human, to be exposed to a new problem domain, learn about it and then use reasoning processes to make decisions. While AI techniques have been used across a wide variety of problem domains, an AGI would require an AI that could reason beyond its programming and training. This paper presents a small step towards producing an AGI. It describes a mechanism for an AI to learn about and develop reasoning pathways to make decisions in an a priori unknown domain. It combines a classical AI technique, the expert system, with a its modern adaptation - the gradient descent trained expert system (GDTES) - and utilizes generative artificial intelligence (GAI) to create a network and training data set for this system. These can be created from available sources or may draw upon knowledge incorporated in a GAI's own pre-trained model. The learning process in GDTES is used to optimize the AI's decision-making. While this approach does not meet the standards that many have defined for an AGI, it provides a somewhat similar capability, albeit one which requires a learning process before use.
6/18/2024