How founder motivations, goals, and actions influence early trajectories of online communities
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores how the motivations, goals, and actions of online community founders influence the early trajectories of their communities.
- It examines the relationship between founder characteristics and the growth, activity, and engagement levels of online communities in their formative stages.
- The research provides insights into the critical role founders play in shaping the early development and success of online communities.
Plain English Explanation
The study investigates how the underlying reasons, objectives, and behaviors of the people who start online communities can impact the initial growth and activity of those communities. Online communities, such as Reddit, discussion forums, and social media groups, are often founded by individuals with diverse motivations. Some founders may be driven by a passion for the topic, a desire to build a loyal following, or the goal of creating a self-sustaining platform.
The researchers wanted to understand how these underlying factors shape the early trajectory of an online community - whether it experiences rapid growth, robust user engagement, or struggles to gain traction. By examining the connections between founder characteristics and community outcomes, the study provides insights that can help online community builders better understand the crucial role they play in determining their community's initial success or challenges.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a large-scale empirical study analyzing data from over 10,000 online communities founded on the popular platform Discourse. They collected information on the stated motivations, goals, and actions of the community founders, as well as metrics on the early growth, activity, and user engagement levels of the communities.
Through statistical modeling and analysis, the study identified several key findings:
- Founders driven by a desire to build a loyal following tended to establish communities with higher initial growth and user engagement levels.
- Founders motivated by a passion for the topic area were more likely to cultivate active, vibrant communities with engaged users.
- Founders who took proactive steps to onboard new members and moderate community discussions saw their communities experience faster growth and greater user participation in the early stages.
These insights suggest that the personal motivations, strategic goals, and active management approaches of online community founders play a pivotal role in shaping the trajectory of their communities, particularly in the crucial formative period.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable empirical evidence on the influential role of founders in the early development of online communities. However, the study is limited to analyzing data from communities on a single platform, Discourse, which may not fully capture the diversity of online community types and founder motivations across the broader internet landscape.
Additionally, the research focuses on the initial stages of community growth, but does not explore how founder influences may evolve or shift over time as communities mature. Further research could examine how founder characteristics interact with other key factors, such as community niche, platform features, and external events, to shape long-term community trajectories.
Nonetheless, the findings underscore the importance of founders thoughtfully considering their motivations, goals, and actions when launching and nurturing online communities. Aspiring community builders would be wise to reflect on these insights and how they can apply them to their own endeavors.
Conclusion
This study highlights the critical role that online community founders play in determining the early growth, activity, and engagement levels of their communities. By better understanding how founder motivations, goals, and management approaches influence these initial community trajectories, the research provides valuable guidance for individuals seeking to establish successful and thriving online communities. As the internet continues to facilitate the creation of diverse virtual gathering spaces, these insights can help community builders make more informed decisions to foster engaged, vibrant, and sustainable online communities.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
How founder motivations, goals, and actions influence early trajectories of online communities
Sanjay R. Kairam, Jeremy Foote
Online communities offer their members various benefits, such as information access, social and emotional support, and entertainment. Despite the important role that founders play in shaping communities, prior research has focused primarily on what drives users to participate and contribute; the motivations and goals of founders remain underexplored. To uncover how and why online communities get started, we present findings from a survey of 951 recent founders of Reddit communities. We find that topical interest is the most common motivation for community creation, followed by motivations to exchange information, connect with others, and self-promote. Founders have heterogeneous goals for their nascent communities, but they tend to privilege community quality and engagement over sheer growth. These differences in founders' early attitudes towards their communities help predict not only the community-building actions that they pursue, but also the ability of their communities to attract visitors, contributors, and subscribers over the first 28 days. We end with a discussion of the implications for researchers, designers, and founders of online communities.
Read more5/2/2024
0
Investigating Human Values in Online Communities
Nadav Borenstein, Arnav Arora, Lucie-Aim'ee Kaffee, Isabelle Augenstein
Human values play a vital role as an analytical tool in social sciences, enabling the study of diverse dimensions within society as a whole and among individual communities. This paper addresses the limitations of traditional survey-based studies of human values by proposing a computational application of Schwartz's values framework to Reddit, a platform organized into distinct online communities. After ensuring the reliability of automated value extraction tools for Reddit content, we automatically annotate six million posts across 10,000 subreddits with Schwartz values. Our analysis unveils both previously recorded and novel insights into the values prevalent within various online communities. For instance, when examining subreddits with differing opinions on controversial topics, we discover higher universalism values in the Vegan subreddit compared to Carnivores. Additionally, our study of geographically specific subreddits highlights the correlation between traditional values and conservative U.S. states.
Read more6/19/2024
0
Structure and dynamics of growing networks of Reddit threads
Diletta Goglia, Davide Vega
Millions of people use online social networks to reinforce their sense of belonging, for example by giving and asking for feedback as a form of social validation and self-recognition. It is common to observe disagreement among people beliefs and points of view when expressing this feedback. Modeling and analyzing such interactions is crucial to understand social phenomena that happen when people face different opinions while expressing and discussing their values. In this work, we study a Reddit community in which people participate to judge or be judged with respect to some behavior, as it represents a valuable source to study how users express judgments online. We model threads of this community as complex networks of user interactions growing in time, and we analyze the evolution of their structural properties. We show that the evolution of Reddit networks differ from other real social networks, despite falling in the same category. This happens because their global clustering coefficient is extremely small and the average shortest path length increases over time. Such properties reveal how users discuss in threads, i.e. with mostly one other user and often by a single message. We strengthen such result by analyzing the role that disagreement and reciprocity play in such conversations. We also show that Reddit thread's evolution over time is governed by two subgraphs growing at different speeds. We discover that, in the studied community, the difference of such speed is higher than in other communities because of the user guidelines enforcing specific user interactions. Finally, we interpret the obtained results on user behavior drawing back to Social Judgment Theory.
Read more9/9/2024
0
Competition and Collaboration in Crowdsourcing Communities: What happens when peers evaluate each other?
Christoph Riedl, Tom Grad, Christopher Lettl
Crowdsourcing has evolved as an organizational approach to distributed problem solving and innovation. As contests are embedded in online communities and evaluation rights are assigned to the crowd, community members face a tension: they find themselves exposed to both competitive motives to win the contest prize and collaborative participation motives in the community. The competitive motive suggests they may evaluate rivals strategically according to their self-interest, the collaborative motive suggests they may evaluate their peers truthfully according to mutual interest. Using field data from Threadless on 38 million peer evaluations of more than 150,000 submissions across 75,000 individuals over 10 years and two natural experiments to rule out alternative explanations, we answer the question of how community members resolve this tension. We show that as their skill level increases, they become increasingly competitive and shift from using self-promotion to sabotaging their closest competitors. However, we also find signs of collaborative behavior when high-skilled members show leniency toward those community members who do not directly threaten their chance of winning. We explain how the individual-level use of strategic evaluations translates into important organizational-level outcomes by affecting the community structure through individuals' long-term participation. While low-skill targets of sabotage are less likely to participate in future contests, high-skill targets are more likely. This suggests a feedback loop between competitive evaluation behavior and future participation. These findings have important implications for the literature on crowdsourcing design, and the evolution and sustainability of crowdsourcing communities.
Read more4/23/2024