How local constraints influence network diameter and applications to LCL generalizations

Read original: arXiv:2409.01305 - Published 9/4/2024 by Nicolas Bousquet, Laurent Feuilloley, Th'eo Pierron
Total Score

0

How local constraints influence network diameter and applications to LCL generalizations

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores how local constraints, such as degree limits or vertex coloring, can influence the diameter of a network.
  • The researchers apply their findings to generalizations of the Locally Checkable Labeling (LCL) problem, which is a fundamental concept in distributed computing.
  • The paper provides new bounds on network diameter and applies them to gain insights about the complexity of solving LCL problems.

Plain English Explanation

The paper examines how restrictions placed on individual nodes or connections in a network can affect the overall size, or "diameter," of that network. For example, if each node is only allowed to connect to a limited number of other nodes, how does that impact the maximum distance between any two nodes in the network?

The researchers take this concept and apply it to a problem known as Locally Checkable Labeling (LCL), which is an important topic in the field of distributed computing. LCL problems involve assigning labels to the nodes in a network based on local information, without any single node having a global view of the entire network.

By understanding how local constraints affect network diameter, the paper provides new insights into the complexity of solving different types of LCL problems. This could have important implications for designing efficient distributed systems and algorithms.

Technical Explanation

The paper's key technical contributions are:

  1. Establishing new upper and lower bounds on the diameter of networks with local degree constraints, vertex coloring constraints, and other types of local constraints.

  2. Applying these diameter bounds to gain a better understanding of the complexity of solving LCL problems in distributed settings. The researchers show how the diameter bounds can be used to derive new upper and lower bounds on the time complexity of LCL problems.

The authors start by analyzing how various local constraints, such as limiting the number of connections per node or requiring that neighboring nodes have different colors, can influence the overall network diameter. They prove several theorems that quantify these relationships between local constraints and global network properties.

They then leverage these diameter results to study the computational complexity of LCL problems. LCL problems involve assigning labels to nodes in a distributed network based only on the local information available to each node. The paper demonstrates how the new diameter bounds can be used to derive improved upper and lower bounds on the time complexity of solving different classes of LCL problems.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a valuable contribution by bridging the gap between local constraints and global network properties, and then applying these insights to the well-studied LCL problem. The theoretical analysis is rigorous and the results provide a deeper understanding of the fundamental trade-offs involved in distributed computing.

However, as with any theoretical work, the applicability of the results to real-world distributed systems may be limited. The paper focuses on worst-case analysis and does not consider aspects like network dynamics, node failures, or practical implementation details that can significantly impact the performance of distributed algorithms in practice.

Additionally, while the paper covers a range of local constraints, there may be other types of constraints or network topologies that are not addressed. Further research is needed to understand the generalizability of the findings and explore their implications for a broader class of distributed systems and algorithms.

Conclusion

This paper highlights an important connection between local constraints and global network properties, and demonstrates how these insights can be applied to deepen our understanding of the complexity of solving fundamental problems in distributed computing.

The theoretical results provide a solid foundation for future work in this area, and may inspire new approaches to designing efficient and robust distributed systems. As the field of distributed computing continues to grow in importance, research like this that bridges theory and practice will be crucial for advancing the state of the art.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

How local constraints influence network diameter and applications to LCL generalizations
Total Score

0

How local constraints influence network diameter and applications to LCL generalizations

Nicolas Bousquet, Laurent Feuilloley, Th'eo Pierron

In this paper, we investigate how local rules enforced at every node can influence the topology of a network. More precisely, we establish several results on the diameter of trees as a function of the number of nodes, as listed below. These results have important consequences on the landscape of locally checkable labelings (LCL) on emph{unbounded} degree graphs, a case in which our lack of knowledge is in striking contrast with that of emph{bounded degree graphs}, that has been intensively studied recently. [See paper for full abstract.]

Read more

9/4/2024

🔗

Total Score

0

New bounds on the cohesion of complete-link and other linkage methods for agglomeration clustering

Sanjoy Dasgupta, Eduardo Laber

Linkage methods are among the most popular algorithms for hierarchical clustering. Despite their relevance the current knowledge regarding the quality of the clustering produced by these methods is limited. Here, we improve the currently available bounds on the maximum diameter of the clustering obtained by complete-link for metric spaces. One of our new bounds, in contrast to the existing ones, allows us to separate complete-link from single-link in terms of approximation for the diameter, which corroborates the common perception that the former is more suitable than the latter when the goal is producing compact clusters. We also show that our techniques can be employed to derive upper bounds on the cohesion of a class of linkage methods that includes the quite popular average-link.

Read more

5/3/2024

Decreasing verification radius in local certification
Total Score

0

Decreasing verification radius in local certification

Laurent Feuilloley, Jan Janouv{s}ek, Jan Maty'av{s} Kv{r}iv{s}v{t}an, Josef Erik Sedl'av{c}ek

This paper deals with local certification, specifically locally checkable proofs: given a graph property, the task is to certify whether a graph satisfies the property. The verification of this certification needs to be done locally without the knowledge of the whole graph. More precisely, a distributed algorithm, called a verifier, is executed on each vertex. The verifier observes the local neighborhood up to a constant distance and either accepts or rejects. We examine the trade-off between the visibility radius and the size of certificates. We describe a procedure that decreases the radius by encoding the neighbourhood of each vertex into its certificate. We also provide a corresponding lower bound on the required certificate size increase, showing that such an approach is close to optimal.

Read more

8/21/2024

Online Locality Meets Distributed Quantum Computing
Total Score

0

Online Locality Meets Distributed Quantum Computing

Amirreza Akbari, Xavier Coiteux-Roy, Francesco d'Amore, Franc{c}ois Le Gall, Henrik Lievonen, Darya Melnyk, Augusto Modanese, Shreyas Pai, Marc-Olivier Renou, V'aclav Rozhov{n}, Jukka Suomela

We extend the theory of locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs) from the classical LOCAL model to a number of other models that have been studied recently, including the quantum-LOCAL model, finitely-dependent processes, non-signaling model, dynamic-LOCAL model, and online-LOCAL model [e.g. STOC 2024, ICALP 2023]. First, we demonstrate the advantage that finitely-dependent processes have over the classical LOCAL model. We show that all LCL problems solvable with locality $O(log^star n)$ in the LOCAL model admit a finitely-dependent distribution (with constant locality). In particular, this gives a finitely-dependent coloring for regular trees, answering an open question by Holroyd [2023]. This also introduces a new formal barrier for understanding the distributed quantum advantage: it is not possible to exclude quantum advantage for any LCL in the $Theta(log^star n)$ complexity class by using non-signaling arguments. Second, we put limits on the capabilities of all of these models. To this end, we introduce a model called randomized online-LOCAL, which is strong enough to simulate e.g. SLOCAL and dynamic-LOCAL, and we show that it is also strong enough to simulate any non-signaling distribution and hence any quantum-LOCAL algorithm. We prove the following result for rooted trees: if we can solve an LCL problem with locality $o(log log n)$ in the randomized online-LOCAL model, we can solve it with locality $O(log^star n)$ in the classical deterministic LOCAL model. Put together, these results show that in rooted trees the set of LCLs that can be solved with locality $O(log^star n)$ is the same across all these models: classical deterministic and randomized LOCAL, quantum-LOCAL, non-signaling model, dynamic-LOCAL, and deterministic and randomized online-LOCAL.

Read more

4/10/2024