New bounds on the cohesion of complete-link and other linkage methods for agglomeration clustering
0
🔗
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the quality of clustering produced by popular hierarchical clustering algorithms, known as linkage methods.
- The authors focus on improving the bounds on the maximum diameter of the clustering obtained by the complete-link method, which is commonly perceived as more suitable than single-link for producing compact clusters.
- The paper also shows how the techniques can be used to derive upper bounds on the cohesion of a class of linkage methods, including the popular average-link.
Plain English Explanation
Hierarchical clustering is a widely used technique for grouping similar data points together. Linkage methods are among the most popular algorithms for this task. However, the current understanding of how well these methods perform in terms of the quality of the resulting clusters is limited.
In this paper, the authors aim to improve our knowledge about the quality of the clustering produced by the complete-link method, which is a specific type of linkage algorithm. They provide new bounds, or limits, on the maximum diameter (or maximum distance between any two points) of the clusters created by complete-link. This is important because the diameter is a measure of how compact or well-grouped the clusters are.
Interestingly, the authors show that their new bounds can help distinguish complete-link from another popular linkage method, single-link, in terms of the quality of the clustering. This supports the common perception that complete-link is better suited than single-link when the goal is to produce compact, well-defined clusters.
The researchers also demonstrate that their techniques can be used to derive upper bounds on the cohesion (or internal similarity) of a broader class of linkage methods, including the widely used average-link algorithm.
Technical Explanation
The paper focuses on improving the currently available bounds on the maximum diameter of the clustering obtained by the complete-link method for metric spaces. The authors provide two new bounds, one of which allows them to separate complete-link from single-link in terms of approximation for the diameter.
This is significant because it corroborates the common perception that complete-link is more suitable than single-link when the goal is to produce compact clusters. The authors also show that their techniques can be employed to derive upper bounds on the cohesion of a class of linkage methods that includes the popular average-link algorithm.
The paper builds upon previous work on the computational complexity of hierarchical clustering and the approximation guarantees of clustering algorithms. The authors leverage various mathematical and algorithmic techniques to derive their new bounds and insights.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable theoretical insights into the quality of clustering produced by popular hierarchical clustering methods. However, it is important to note that the analysis is primarily focused on the theoretical properties of these algorithms, and the practical implications may depend on the specific dataset and application domain.
While the authors demonstrate the ability to separate complete-link from single-link in terms of diameter approximation, it would be interesting to see how these results translate to real-world scenarios and the impact on the clustering quality perceived by human users. Further research could explore the practical performance of these algorithms on diverse datasets and applications.
Additionally, the paper focuses on the diameter and cohesion as measures of clustering quality, but other metrics, such as interpretability, may also be of interest in certain use cases. Exploring the trade-offs and relationships between different quality measures could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the strengths and limitations of these clustering methods.
Conclusion
This paper advances our theoretical understanding of the quality of clustering produced by popular hierarchical clustering algorithms, particularly the complete-link method. The authors' new bounds on the maximum diameter of complete-link clustering and their ability to separate it from single-link in terms of approximation provide valuable insights into the relative strengths of these methods.
The techniques presented in the paper can also be applied to derive upper bounds on the cohesion of a broader class of linkage methods, including average-link. These findings contribute to the ongoing research on the computational and theoretical aspects of hierarchical clustering, which is a fundamental tool in data analysis and machine learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔗
0
New bounds on the cohesion of complete-link and other linkage methods for agglomeration clustering
Sanjoy Dasgupta, Eduardo Laber
Linkage methods are among the most popular algorithms for hierarchical clustering. Despite their relevance the current knowledge regarding the quality of the clustering produced by these methods is limited. Here, we improve the currently available bounds on the maximum diameter of the clustering obtained by complete-link for metric spaces. One of our new bounds, in contrast to the existing ones, allows us to separate complete-link from single-link in terms of approximation for the diameter, which corroborates the common perception that the former is more suitable than the latter when the goal is producing compact clusters. We also show that our techniques can be employed to derive upper bounds on the cohesion of a class of linkage methods that includes the quite popular average-link.
Read more5/3/2024
👁️
0
It's Hard to HAC with Average Linkage!
MohammadHossein Bateni, Laxman Dhulipala, Kishen N Gowda, D Ellis Hershkowitz, Rajesh Jayaram, Jakub {L}k{a}cki
Average linkage Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering (HAC) is an extensively studied and applied method for hierarchical clustering. Recent applications to massive datasets have driven significant interest in near-linear-time and efficient parallel algorithms for average linkage HAC. We provide hardness results that rule out such algorithms. On the sequential side, we establish a runtime lower bound of $n^{3/2-epsilon}$ on $n$ node graphs for sequential combinatorial algorithms under standard fine-grained complexity assumptions. This essentially matches the best-known running time for average linkage HAC. On the parallel side, we prove that average linkage HAC likely cannot be parallelized even on simple graphs by showing that it is CC-hard on trees of diameter $4$. On the possibility side, we demonstrate that average linkage HAC can be efficiently parallelized (i.e., it is in NC) on paths and can be solved in near-linear time when the height of the output cluster hierarchy is small.
Read more4/24/2024
🔗
0
Optimal Parallel Algorithms for Dendrogram Computation and Single-Linkage Clustering
Laxman Dhulipala, Xiaojun Dong, Kishen N Gowda, Yan Gu
Computing a Single-Linkage Dendrogram (SLD) is a key step in the classic single-linkage hierarchical clustering algorithm. Given an input edge-weighted tree $T$, the SLD of $T$ is a binary dendrogram that summarizes the $n-1$ clusterings obtained by contracting the edges of $T$ in order of weight. Existing algorithms for computing the SLD all require $Omega(nlog n)$ work where $n = |T|$. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge no prior work provides a parallel algorithm obtaining non-trivial speedup for this problem. In this paper, we design faster parallel algorithms for computing SLDs both in theory and in practice based on new structural results about SLDs. In particular, we obtain a deterministic output-sensitive parallel algorithm based on parallel tree contraction that requires $O(n log h)$ work and $O(log^2 n log^2 h)$ depth, where $h$ is the height of the output SLD. We also give a deterministic bottom-up algorithm for the problem inspired by the nearest-neighbor chain algorithm for hierarchical agglomerative clustering, and show that it achieves $O(nlog h)$ work and $O(h log n)$ depth. Our results are based on a novel divide-and-conquer framework for building SLDs, inspired by divide-and-conquer algorithms for Cartesian trees. Our new algorithms can quickly compute the SLD on billion-scale trees, and obtain up to 150x speedup over the highly-efficient Union-Find algorithm typically used to compute SLDs in practice.
Read more5/14/2024
🔗
0
Low-Distortion Clustering in Bounded Growth Graphs
Yi-Jun Chang, Varsha Dani, Thomas P. Hayes
The well-known clustering algorithm of Miller, Peng, and Xu (SPAA 2013) is useful for many applications, including low-diameter decomposition and low-energy distributed algorithms. One nice property of their clustering, shown in previous work by Chang, Dani, Hayes, and Pettie (PODC 2020), is that distances in the cluster graph are rescaled versions of distances in the original graph, up to an $O(log n)$ distortion factor and rounding issues. Minimizing this distortion factor is important for efficiency in computing the clustering, as well as in further applications, once the clustering has been constructed. We prove that there exist graphs for which an $Omega((log n)^{1/3})$ distortion factor is necessary for any clustering. We also consider a class of nice graphs which we call uniformly bounded independence graphs. These include, for example, paths, lattice graphs, and dense unit disk graphs. For these graphs, we prove that clusterings of constant distortion always exist, and moreover, we give an efficient distributed algorithm to construct them. Our clustering algorithm is based on Voronoi cells centered at the vertices of a maximal independent set in a suitable power graph. Applications of our new clustering include low-energy simulation of distributed algorithms in the LOCAL, CONGEST, and RADIO-CONGEST models, as well as efficient approximate solutions to distributed combinatorial optimization problems. We complement these results with matching or nearly matching lower bounds.
Read more9/9/2024