How persuade's psychological states and traits shape digital persuasion: Lessons learnt from mobile burglary prevention encounters

Overview

• Persuasion is a complex process that requires sensitivity to understand the states, traits, and values of the persuadee.
• Persuasive systems often overlook the nuanced nature of persuasion, favoring one-size-fits-all approaches that may alienate certain users.
• This study examines how professional burglary prevention advisors adapt their persuasive approaches based on the individual attributes of their clients.

Plain English Explanation

Persuading someone can be a tricky thing. Persuaders need to be very sensitive and understanding of the other person's internal states, personality traits, and values. They have to navigate the complex world of human interaction.

Unfortunately, a lot of research on persuasive systems overlooks this delicate nature of persuasion. Instead, these systems often take a one-size-fits-all approach, which can end up alienating certain users.

This study looks at how professional burglary prevention advisors work to persuade their clients to enhance their home security. The researchers found that these advisors adapt their approaches based on the specific attributes of each client. They may deviate from their intended and technologically-supported practices in order to accommodate the individual needs and characteristics of the person they're trying to persuade.

The study identifies several client-specific aspects that can influence the effectiveness of persuasive efforts. It also suggests strategies for addressing these differences. These findings could be useful for designing personalized persuasive systems that rely on conversational approaches to persuasion.

Technical Explanation

The study examined how professional burglary prevention advisors navigate the process of persuading clients to enhance their home security. The researchers conducted in-depth interviews with these advisors to understand how they adapt their persuasive approaches based on the specific states, traits, and values of each individual client.

The findings revealed that the advisors often deviate from their intended and technologically-supported practices in order to accommodate the unique attributes of their clients. For example, they may adjust their language, framing, and persuasive strategies to better align with a client's personal motivations, concerns, and decision-making tendencies.

The study identified several client-specific factors that can moderate the effectiveness of the advisors' persuasive efforts, such as the client's risk perception, openness to change, and trust in the advisor. It also highlighted the importance of the advisor-client relationship and the need for empathy and sensitivity in the persuasion process.

Based on these insights, the researchers suggest strategies for designing personalized persuasive systems that can adapt their approaches to the individual needs and characteristics of users. This could involve incorporating conversational modes of persuasion, leveraging user data to tailor the persuasive message, and fostering a sense of rapport and trust between the system and the user.

Critical Analysis

The study provides valuable insights into the nuanced and context-dependent nature of persuasion, particularly in the domain of home security. However, it is important to note that the findings are based on a small sample of professional advisors and may not be generalizable to other persuasive contexts or user populations.

Additionally, while the study highlights the limitations of one-size-fits-all persuasive systems, it does not provide a comprehensive framework for designing personalized persuasive systems. Further research would be needed to validate the proposed strategies and explore their implementation in real-world applications.

There is also a need to consider potential ethical concerns related to the use of persuasive technologies, such as the risk of manipulation or the potential for unintended consequences. Designers of personalized persuasive systems should be mindful of these issues and strive to ensure that their systems empower users rather than exploit them.

Conclusion

This study underscores the importance of understanding the nuanced and context-dependent nature of persuasion, particularly when designing persuasive systems. By examining how professional burglary prevention advisors adapt their approaches to individual client attributes, the researchers have provided valuable insights that can inform the development of personalized persuasive systems with improved effectiveness and user acceptance. However, further research is needed to address the ethical considerations and limitations of this approach, as well as to refine the strategies for implementing personalized persuasive technologies in real-world settings.