How well can large language models explain business processes?

Read original: arXiv:2401.12846 - Published 7/25/2024 by Dirk Fahland, Fabiana Fournier, Lior Limonad, Inna Skarbovsky, Ava J. E. Swevels
Total Score

0

How well can large language models explain business processes?

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper investigates how well large language models can explain business processes.
  • It was funded by the European Union's Horizon research and innovation program under several grant agreements.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. This paper explores whether these models can effectively explain complex business processes to people. Business processes are the series of steps and activities an organization carries out to achieve a specific goal, like processing a customer order or managing inventory.

The researchers wanted to see if large language models could take a business process and break it down in a way that is easy for humans to understand. This could be helpful for training employees, documenting procedures, or even automating certain business tasks.

By testing the models on explaining real-world business processes, the researchers aimed to identify the strengths and limitations of this approach. They wanted to understand what types of business tasks the models excel at explaining, and where they might struggle. This knowledge could inform the development of large language models that are better suited for business applications in the future.

Technical Explanation

The paper does not appear to contain a technical explanation or details about specific experiments or model architectures. It seems to be more of a high-level discussion about the potential for using large language models to explain business processes.

Critical Analysis

The paper does not provide a detailed critical analysis or discussion of limitations and areas for future research. As an overview piece, it likely focused more on introducing the general research question and potential applications rather than a deep dive into the technical challenges.

Conclusion

This paper explores the idea of using powerful large language models to explain complex business processes in plain, easy-to-understand terms. The researchers were funded by several EU research grants to investigate this area, which suggests it is an emerging and important topic. While the paper does not go into technical specifics, it highlights the potential benefits and open questions around this application of large language models in a business context.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

How well can large language models explain business processes?
Total Score

0

How well can large language models explain business processes?

Dirk Fahland, Fabiana Fournier, Lior Limonad, Inna Skarbovsky, Ava J. E. Swevels

Large Language Models (LLMs) are likely to play a prominent role in future AI-augmented business process management systems (ABPMSs) catering functionalities across all system lifecycle stages. One such system's functionality is Situation-Aware eXplainability (SAX), which relates to generating causally sound and yet human-interpretable explanations that take into account the process context in which the explained condition occurred. In this paper, we present the SAX4BPM framework developed to generate SAX explanations. The SAX4BPM suite consists of a set of services and a central knowledge repository. The functionality of these services is to elicit the various knowledge ingredients that underlie SAX explanations. A key innovative component among these ingredients is the causal process execution view. In this work, we integrate the framework with an LLM to leverage its power to synthesize the various input ingredients for the sake of improved SAX explanations. Since the use of LLMs for SAX is also accompanied by a certain degree of doubt related to its capacity to adequately fulfill SAX along with its tendency for hallucination and lack of inherent capacity to reason, we pursued a methodological evaluation of the quality of the generated explanations. To this aim, we developed a designated scale and conducted a rigorous user study. Our findings show that the input presented to the LLMs aided with the guard-railing of its performance, yielding SAX explanations having better-perceived fidelity. This improvement is moderated by the perception of trust and curiosity. More so, this improvement comes at the cost of the perceived interpretability of the explanation.

Read more

7/25/2024

Towards a Benchmark for Causal Business Process Reasoning with LLMs
Total Score

0

Towards a Benchmark for Causal Business Process Reasoning with LLMs

Fabiana Fournier, Lior Limonad, Inna Skarbovsky

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for boosting organizational efficiency and automating tasks. While not originally designed for complex cognitive processes, recent efforts have further extended to employ LLMs in activities such as reasoning, planning, and decision-making. In business processes, such abilities could be invaluable for leveraging on the massive corpora LLMs have been trained on for gaining deep understanding of such processes. In this work, we plant the seeds for the development of a benchmark to assess the ability of LLMs to reason about causal and process perspectives of business operations. We refer to this view as Causally-augmented Business Processes (BP^C). The core of the benchmark comprises a set of BP^C related situations, a set of questions about these situations, and a set of deductive rules employed to systematically resolve the ground truth answers to these questions. Also with the power of LLMs, the seed is then instantiated into a larger-scale set of domain-specific situations and questions. Reasoning on BP^C is of crucial importance for process interventions and process improvement. Our benchmark, accessible at https://huggingface.co/datasets/ibm/BPC, can be used in one of two possible modalities: testing the performance of any target LLM and training an LLM to advance its capability to reason about BP^C.

Read more

7/17/2024

Leveraging Large Language Models for Enhanced Process Model Comprehension
Total Score

0

Leveraging Large Language Models for Enhanced Process Model Comprehension

Humam Kourani, Alessandro Berti, Jasmin Henrich, Wolfgang Kratsch, Robin Weidlich, Chiao-Yun Li, Ahmad Arslan, Daniel Schuster, Wil M. P. van der Aalst

In Business Process Management (BPM), effectively comprehending process models is crucial yet poses significant challenges, particularly as organizations scale and processes become more complex. This paper introduces a novel framework utilizing the advanced capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance the interpretability of complex process models. We present different methods for abstracting business process models into a format accessible to LLMs, and we implement advanced prompting strategies specifically designed to optimize LLM performance within our framework. Additionally, we present a tool, AIPA, that implements our proposed framework and allows for conversational process querying. We evaluate our framework and tool by i) an automatic evaluation comparing different LLMs, model abstractions, and prompting strategies and ii) a user study designed to assess AIPA's effectiveness comprehensively. Results demonstrate our framework's ability to improve the accessibility and interpretability of process models, pioneering new pathways for integrating AI technologies into the BPM field.

Read more

8/22/2024

LLM-SAP: Large Language Models Situational Awareness Based Planning
Total Score

0

LLM-SAP: Large Language Models Situational Awareness Based Planning

Liman Wang, Hanyang Zhong

This study explores integrating large language models (LLMs) with situational awareness-based planning (SAP) to enhance the decision-making capabilities of AI agents in dynamic and uncertain environments. We employ a multi-agent reasoning framework to develop a methodology that anticipates and actively mitigates potential risks through iterative feedback and evaluation processes. Our approach diverges from traditional automata theory by incorporating the complexity of human-centric interactions into the planning process, thereby expanding the planning scope of LLMs beyond structured and predictable scenarios. The results demonstrate significant improvements in the model's ability to provide comparative safe actions within hazard interactions, offering a perspective on proactive and reactive planning strategies. This research highlights the potential of LLMs to perform human-like action planning, thereby paving the way for more sophisticated, reliable, and safe AI systems in unpredictable real-world applications.

Read more

6/18/2024