Human-Machine Shared Control Approach for the Takeover of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control

Read original: arXiv:2407.11551 - Published 7/17/2024 by Haoran Wang, Zhenning Li, Arno Eichberger, Jia Hu
Total Score

0

🚀

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) systems can pose safety risks during human takeover, especially when the vehicle is following closely.
  • This research aims to develop a CACC takeover controller that ensures a smooth transition from automated to human control.
  • The proposed approach uses an indirect human-machine shared control strategy, modeled as a Stackelberg competition, to guide the human driver's response and maintain stability.
  • The controller integrates the human reaction function into the machine's predictive control system to enhance planning optimality.

Plain English Explanation

CACC systems can automatically control a vehicle's speed and distance from the car in front, allowing vehicles to drive closer together. However, this close-following strategy can make drivers feel unsafe when they need to take over control, such as when exiting a freeway. This could lead to sudden braking, potentially causing collisions.

To address this, the researchers developed a new CACC takeover controller that helps transition smoothly from automated to human control. Their approach uses an indirect human-machine shared control strategy, where the machine "guides" the human driver to respond in a way that aligns with the machine's expectations. This helps maintain stability and safety during the takeover.

The controller also integrates the human's reaction function into the machine's predictive control system, going beyond a simple prediction-planning pipeline. This helps the machine better anticipate how the human will respond and optimize the plan accordingly.

Technical Explanation

The proposed CACC takeover maneuver employs an indirect human-machine shared control approach, modeled as a Stackelberg competition where the machine acts as the leader and the human as the follower. The machine guides the human to respond in a manner that aligns with the machine's expectations, aiding in maintaining following stability.

Additionally, the human reaction function is integrated into the machine's predictive control system, moving beyond a simple prediction-planning pipeline to enhance planning optimality. This allows the machine to better anticipate how the human will respond and adjust its plan accordingly.

The controller has been verified to:

  1. Enable a smooth takeover maneuver of CACC
  2. Ensure string stability within a specific Operational Design Domain (ODD) when human control authority is below 32.7%
  3. Enhance both perceived and actual safety through machine interventions
  4. Reduce the impact on upstream traffic by up to 60%

Critical Analysis

The research presents a promising approach to address the safety challenges of CACC systems during human takeover. By using an indirect shared control strategy and integrating the human's reaction function, the controller helps maintain stability and safety during the transition.

However, the paper does not provide a detailed discussion of the limitations of the proposed approach. For example, it's unclear how the controller would perform in a wider range of ODD conditions or with different types of human drivers. Additionally, the impact on user trust and acceptance of the system is not fully explored.

Further research could investigate the effects of delay-aware control on the system's performance, as well as explore more naturalistic human-machine interaction scenarios to assess the real-world applicability of the approach.

Conclusion

This research presents a novel CACC takeover controller that aims to ensure a smooth transition from automated to human control, addressing a critical safety challenge in CACC systems. By using an indirect shared control strategy and integrating the human's reaction function, the controller helps maintain stability and safety during the takeover process.

The demonstrated benefits, such as enhanced perceived and actual safety, as well as reduced impact on upstream traffic, suggest that this approach could have significant implications for the development of more safe and reliable cooperative adaptive cruise control systems. Further research is needed to explore the limitations and broader applicability of the proposed controller.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🚀

Total Score

0

Human-Machine Shared Control Approach for the Takeover of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control

Haoran Wang, Zhenning Li, Arno Eichberger, Jia Hu

Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) often requires human takeover for tasks such as exiting a freeway. Direct human takeover can pose significant risks, especially given the close-following strategy employed by CACC, which might cause drivers to feel unsafe and execute hard braking, potentially leading to collisions. This research aims to develop a CACC takeover controller that ensures a smooth transition from automated to human control. The proposed CACC takeover maneuver employs an indirect human-machine shared control approach, modeled as a Stackelberg competition where the machine acts as the leader and the human as the follower. The machine guides the human to respond in a manner that aligns with the machine's expectations, aiding in maintaining following stability. Additionally, the human reaction function is integrated into the machine's predictive control system, moving beyond a simple prediction-planning pipeline to enhance planning optimality. The controller has been verified to i) enable a smooth takeover maneuver of CACC; ii) ensure string stability within a specific Operational Design Domain (ODD) when human control authority is below 32.7%; iii) enhance both perceived and actual safety through machine interventions; and iv) reduce the impact on upstream traffic by up to 60%.

Read more

7/17/2024

🔗

Total Score

0

Safety-Aware Human-Lead Vehicle Platooning by Proactively Reacting to Uncertain Human Behaving

Jia Hu, Shuhan Wang, Yiming Zhang, Haoran Wang

Human-Lead Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (HL-CACC) is regarded as a promising vehicle platooning technology in real-world implementation. By utilizing a Human-driven Vehicle (HV) as the platoon leader, HL-CACC reduces the cost and enhances the reliability of perception and decision-making. However, state-of-the-art HL-CACC technology still has a great limitation on driving safety for the lack of considering the leading human driver's uncertain behaving. In this study, a HL-CACC controller is designed based on Stochastic Model Predictive Control (SMPC). It is enabled to predict the driving intention of the leading Connected Human-Driven Vehicle (CHV). The proposed controller has the following features: i) enhanced perceived safety in oscillating traffic; ii) guaranteed safety against hard brakes; iii) computational efficient for real-time implementation. The proposed controller is evaluated on a PreScan&Simulink simulation platform. Real vehicle trajectory data is collected for the calibration of simulation. Results reveal that the proposed controller: i) improves perceived safety by 19.17% in oscillating traffic; ii) enhances actual safety by 7.76% against hard brake; iii) is confirmed with string stability. The computation time is approximately 3 milliseconds when running on a laptop equipped with an Intel i5-13500H CPU. This indicates the proposed controller is ready for real-time implementation.

Read more

5/14/2024

Total Score

0

Validation of critical maneuvers based on shared control

Mauricio Marcano, Joseba Sarabia, Asier Zubizarreta, Sergio D'iaz

This paper presents the validation of shared control strategies for critical maneuvers in automated driving systems. Shared control involves collaboration between the driver and automation, allowing both parties to actively engage and cooperate at different levels of the driving task. The involvement of the driver adds complexity to the control loop, necessitating comprehensive validation methodologies. The proposed approach focuses on two critical maneuvers: overtaking in low visibility scenarios and lateral evasive actions. A modular architecture with an arbitration module and shared control algorithms is implemented, primarily focusing on the lateral control of the vehicle. The validation is conducted using a dynamic simulator, involving 8 real drivers interacting with a virtual environment. The results demonstrate improved safety and user acceptance, indicating the effectiveness of the shared control strategies in comparison with no shared-control support. Future work involves implementing shared control in drive-by-wire systems to enhance safety and driver comfort during critical maneuvers. Overall, this research contributes to the development and validation of shared control approaches in automated driving systems.

Read more

4/8/2024

A Cooperation Control Framework Based on Admittance Control and Time-varying Passive Velocity Field Control for Human--Robot Co-carrying Tasks
Total Score

0

A Cooperation Control Framework Based on Admittance Control and Time-varying Passive Velocity Field Control for Human--Robot Co-carrying Tasks

Dang Van Trong, Sumitaka Honji, Takahiro Wada

Human--robot co-carrying tasks demonstrate their potential in both industrial and everyday applications by leveraging the strengths of both parties. Effective control of robots in these tasks requires minimizing position and velocity errors to complete the shared tasks while also managing the energy level within the closed-loop systems to prevent potential dangers such as instability and unintended force exertion. However, this collaboration scenario poses numerous challenges due to varied human intentions in adapting to workspace characteristics, leading to human--robot conflicts and safety incidents. In this paper, we develop a robot controller that enables the robot partner to re-plan its path leveraging conflict information, follow co-carrying motions accurately, ensure passivity, and regular the energy of the closed-loop system. A cooperation control framework for human--robot co-carrying tasks is constructed by utilizing admittance control and time-varying Passive Velocity Field Control with a fractional exponent energy compensation control term. By measuring the interaction force, the desired trajectory of co-carrying tasks for the robot partner is first generated using admittance control. Thereafter, the new Passive Velocity Field Control with the energy compensation feature is designed to track the desired time-varying trajectory and guarantee passivity. Furthermore, the proposed approach ensures that the system's kinetic energy converges to the desired level within a finite time interval, which is critical for time-critical applications. Numerical simulation demonstrates the efficiency of the proposed cooperation control method through four collaborative transportation scenarios.

Read more

8/1/2024