Human-Robot Interaction Conversational User Enjoyment Scale (HRI CUES)

Read original: arXiv:2405.01354 - Published 7/2/2024 by Bahar Irfan, Jura Miniota, Sofia Thunberg, Erik Lagerstedt, Sanna Kuoppamaki, Gabriel Skantze, Andr'e Pereira
Total Score

0

Human-Robot Interaction Conversational User Enjoyment Scale (HRI CUES)

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Presents the development and validation of the Human-Robot Interaction Conversational User Enjoyment Scale (HRI CUES), a tool to measure user enjoyment in open-domain dialogue with companion robots.
  • Addresses the need for robust quantitative metrics to evaluate user experience in human-robot interaction.
  • Leverages large language models and annotation tasks to create and validate the HRI CUES scale.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on creating a new measurement tool called the Human-Robot Interaction Conversational User Enjoyment Scale (HRI CUES) to evaluate how much people enjoy talking with companion robots in open-ended conversations. This is important because as robots become more advanced and able to have natural conversations, we need ways to quantify how much users are enjoying these interactions.

The researchers used large language models and online annotation tasks to develop and validate the HRI CUES scale. This allows them to create a standardized way to assess user enjoyment that can be used across different robotic systems and conversational scenarios. This builds on previous work on predicting intention to interact with service robots and integrating large language models into multimodal virtual reality systems](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/integrating-large-language-models-multimodal-virtual-reality).

Overall, the HRI CUES scale provides researchers and designers with a useful tool to measure how much people are enjoying their conversations with companion robots. This can help improve the development of these systems to create more engaging and satisfying interactions.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents the development and validation of the Human-Robot Interaction Conversational User Enjoyment Scale (HRI CUES), a new metric for assessing user enjoyment in open-domain dialogue with companion robots. The researchers identified the need for robust quantitative measures of user experience in human-robot interaction, building on prior work on user enjoyment in human-AI interaction and child well-being assessment via online interactions.

The HRI CUES scale was created through a multi-step process. First, the researchers generated an initial item pool based on a review of the literature and expert input. They then used crowdsourced annotation tasks and large language models to refine and validate the scale items. This involved having human annotators rate conversational interactions for enjoyment, which was used to train and evaluate the HRI CUES model.

The final HRI CUES scale consists of 10 items that demonstrated good psychometric properties, including internal consistency, convergent validity, and the ability to differentiate high and low enjoyment interactions. The researchers also provided guidelines for using the scale in practical settings, such as in the evaluation of industrial robotics design and interaction.

Critical Analysis

The HRI CUES scale represents a valuable contribution to the field of human-robot interaction, providing a standardized way to measure user enjoyment in open-domain dialogues. The use of crowdsourcing and large language models to develop and validate the scale is a strength, as it allows the researchers to leverage a broad range of conversational data and human judgments.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of the scale. For example, it is unclear how well the HRI CUES would perform in cross-cultural contexts or with users from diverse backgrounds. Additionally, the scale focuses solely on enjoyment, and other aspects of the user experience, such as perceived usefulness or trust, are not captured.

Further research could explore the application of the HRI CUES in longitudinal studies, as well as its relationship to other measures of human-robot interaction quality, such as those used in child well-being assessment. Investigating the scale's sensitivity to different conversational strategies or robot design features could also provide valuable insights.

Conclusion

The Human-Robot Interaction Conversational User Enjoyment Scale (HRI CUES) represents a significant advancement in the field of human-robot interaction research. By providing a reliable and validated tool for measuring user enjoyment in open-domain dialogues, the scale can support the development of more engaging and satisfying companion robots. The use of large language models and crowdsourcing techniques in the scale's creation demonstrates the potential of these approaches to enhance the quantitative evaluation of human-AI interaction. As the field of robotics continues to evolve, the HRI CUES can serve as a valuable resource for researchers and designers seeking to optimize the user experience in human-robot interaction.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Human-Robot Interaction Conversational User Enjoyment Scale (HRI CUES)
Total Score

0

Human-Robot Interaction Conversational User Enjoyment Scale (HRI CUES)

Bahar Irfan, Jura Miniota, Sofia Thunberg, Erik Lagerstedt, Sanna Kuoppamaki, Gabriel Skantze, Andr'e Pereira

Understanding user enjoyment is crucial in human-robot interaction (HRI), as it can impact interaction quality and influence user acceptance and long-term engagement with robots, particularly in the context of conversations with social robots. However, current assessment methods rely solely on self-reported questionnaires, failing to capture interaction dynamics. This work introduces the Human-Robot Interaction Conversational User Enjoyment Scale (HRI CUES), a novel scale for assessing user enjoyment from an external perspective during conversations with a robot. Developed through rigorous evaluations and discussions of three annotators with relevant expertise, the scale provides a structured framework for assessing enjoyment in each conversation exchange (turn) alongside overall interaction levels. It aims to complement self-reported enjoyment from users and holds the potential for autonomously identifying user enjoyment in real-time HRI. The scale was validated on 25 older adults' open-domain dialogue with a companion robot that was powered by a large language model for conversations, corresponding to 174 minutes of data, showing moderate to good alignment. The dataset is available online. Additionally, the study offers insights into understanding the nuances and challenges of assessing user enjoyment in robot interactions, and provides guidelines on applying the scale to other domains.

Read more

7/2/2024

👁️

Total Score

0

Using Social Cues to Recognize Task Failures for HRI: Framework, Overview, State-of-the-Art, and Future Directions

Alexandra Bremers, Alexandria Pabst, Maria Teresa Parreira, Wendy Ju

Robots that carry out tasks and interact in complex environments will inevitably commit errors. Error detection is thus an essential ability for robots to master to work efficiently and productively. People can leverage social feedback to get an indication of whether an action was successful or not. With advances in computing and artificial intelligence (AI), it is increasingly possible for robots to achieve a similar capability of collecting social feedback. In this work, we take this one step further and propose a framework for how social cues can be used as feedback signals to recognize task failures for human-robot interaction (HRI). Our proposed framework sets out a research agenda based on insights from the literature on behavioral science, human-robot interaction, and machine learning to focus on three areas: 1) social cues as feedback (from behavioral science), 2) recognizing task failures in robots (from HRI), and 3) approaches for autonomous detection of HRI task failures based on social cues (from machine learning). We propose a taxonomy of error detection based on self-awareness and social feedback. Finally, we provide recommendations for HRI researchers and practitioners interested in developing robots that detect task errors using human social cues. This article is intended for interdisciplinary HRI researchers and practitioners, where the third theme of our analysis provides more technical details aiming toward the practical implementation of these systems.

Read more

5/30/2024

🖼️

Total Score

0

Spoken Humanoid Embodied Conversational Agents in Mobile Serious Games: A Usability Assessment

Danai Korre, Judy Robertson

This paper presents an empirical investigation of the extent to which spoken Humanoid Embodied Conversational Agents (HECAs) can foster usability in mobile serious game (MSG) applications. The aim of the research is to assess the impact of multiple agents and illusion of humanness on the quality of the interaction. The experiment investigates two styles of agent presentation: an agent of high human-likeness (HECA) and an agent of low human-likeness (text). The purpose of the experiment is to assess whether and how agents of high humanlikeness can evoke the illusion of humanness and affect usability. Agents of high human-likeness were designed by following the ECA design model that is a proposed guide for ECA development. The results of the experiment with 90 participants show that users prefer to interact with the HECAs. The difference between the two versions is statistically significant with a large effect size (d=1.01), with many of the participants justifying their choice by saying that the human-like characteristics of the HECA made the version more appealing. This research provides key information on the potential effect of HECAs on serious games, which can provide insight into the design of future mobile serious games.

Read more

6/11/2024

Egocentric Robots in a Human-Centric World? Exploring Group-Robot-Interaction in Public Spaces
Total Score

0

Egocentric Robots in a Human-Centric World? Exploring Group-Robot-Interaction in Public Spaces

Ana Muller, Anja Richert

The deployment of social robots in real-world scenarios is increasing, supporting humans in various contexts. However, they still struggle to grasp social dynamics, especially in public spaces, sometimes resulting in violations of social norms, such as interrupting human conversations. This behavior, originating from a limited processing of social norms, might be perceived as robot-centered. Understanding social dynamics, particularly in group-robot-interactions (GRI), underscores the need for further research and development in human-robot-interaction (HRI). Enhancing the interaction abilities of social robots, especially in GRIs, can improve their effectiveness in real-world applications on a micro-level, as group interactions lead to increased motivation and comfort. In this study, we assessed the influence of the interaction condition (dyadic vs. triadic) on the perceived extraversion (ext.) of social robots in public spaces. The research involved 40 HRIs, including 24 dyadic (i.e., one human and one robot) interactions and 16 triadic interactions, which involve at least three entities, including the robot.

Read more

7/26/2024