Hybrid Navigation Acceptability and Safety
2404.11882
0
0
Abstract
Autonomous vessels have emerged as a prominent and accepted solution, particularly in the naval defence sector. However, achieving full autonomy for marine vessels demands the development of robust and reliable control and guidance systems that can handle various encounters with manned and unmanned vessels while operating effectively under diverse weather and sea conditions. A significant challenge in this pursuit is ensuring the autonomous vessels' compliance with the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGs). These regulations present a formidable hurdle for the human-level understanding by autonomous systems as they were originally designed from common navigation practices created since the mid-19th century. Their ambiguous language assumes experienced sailors' interpretation and execution, and therefore demands a high-level (cognitive) understanding of language and agent intentions. These capabilities surpass the current state-of-the-art in intelligent systems. This position paper highlights the critical requirements for a trustworthy control and guidance system, exploring the complexity of adapting COLREGs for safe vessel-on-vessel encounters considering autonomous maritime technology competing and/or cooperating with manned vessels.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the acceptability and safety of hybrid navigation systems, which combine autonomous and human-guided control.
- The research explores three key modules: autonomous situation awareness, readability of human rules, and path planning with collision avoidance.
- The goal is to enhance the usability and trustworthiness of hybrid navigation systems for various applications, such as autonomous vehicles and robotic assistants.
Plain English Explanation
Hybrid navigation systems are a combination of autonomous and human-controlled features. This paper looks at how acceptable and safe these systems are for users.
The researchers focused on three main areas:
- Autonomous Situation Awareness: How well the autonomous system can understand its surroundings and respond accordingly.
- Readability of Human Rules: How easy it is for users to understand and interact with the rules governing the system's behavior.
- Path Planning and Collision Avoidance: How the system plans its movements to reach a destination safely, while avoiding obstacles.
The overall aim is to make these hybrid navigation systems more usable and trustworthy for people, whether in self-driving cars, robot assistants, or other applications. The researchers want to ensure the systems can work well alongside human users.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines the acceptability and safety of hybrid navigation systems, which combine autonomous capabilities with human control and oversight.
In Module 1: Autonomous Situation Awareness, the researchers evaluate how well the autonomous system can perceive its environment and make appropriate decisions. This involves techniques like vision-based perception and shared control strategies to integrate human input.
Module 2: Readability of Human Rules focuses on making the system's behavior and decision-making process transparent and understandable to users. This includes designing intuitive interfaces and human-drone interaction models to facilitate effective collaboration.
In Module 3: Path Planning and Collision Avoidance, the paper explores techniques for safe navigation, such as non-linear model predictive control and leveraging spatial awareness, to ensure the system can reach its destination without endangering users or the environment.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges that further research is needed to fully validate the acceptability and safety of these hybrid navigation systems in real-world applications. Potential limitations include the difficulty of simulating the full complexity of human-system interactions and the challenge of ensuring consistent performance across diverse environments and user populations.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential ethical concerns regarding the responsible development and deployment of these technologies, such as liability in the event of accidents or the equitable access to these systems across different socioeconomic groups.
Overall, the research presents a solid foundation for enhancing the usability and trustworthiness of hybrid navigation systems, but more work is needed to address the broader societal implications and ensure these technologies are deployed safely and responsibly.
Conclusion
This paper provides a comprehensive examination of the acceptability and safety considerations for hybrid navigation systems that combine autonomous capabilities with human oversight and control. By focusing on key modules such as autonomous situation awareness, human-readable rules, and advanced path planning, the researchers aim to improve the usability and trustworthiness of these systems for a wide range of applications.
While the technical research shows promising results, the paper also acknowledges the need for further validation and the consideration of ethical concerns. As these hybrid navigation technologies continue to evolve, it will be crucial to address these challenges to ensure they are deployed in a manner that enhances safety, accessibility, and public trust.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
✅
Robust Perception and Navigation of Autonomous Surface Vehicles in Challenging Environments
Mingi Jeong
0
0
Research on coastal regions traditionally involves methods like manual sampling, monitoring buoys, and remote sensing, but these methods face challenges in spatially and temporally diverse regions of interest. Autonomous surface vehicles (ASVs) with artificial intelligence (AI) are being explored, and recognized by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) as vital for future ecosystem understanding. However, there is not yet a mature technology for autonomous environmental monitoring due to typically complex coastal situations: (1) many static (e.g., buoy, dock) and dynamic (e.g., boats) obstacles not compliant with the rules of the road (COLREGs); (2) uncharted or uncertain information (e.g., non-updated nautical chart); and (3) high-cost ASVs not accessible to the community and citizen science while resulting in technology illiteracy. To address the above challenges, my research involves both system and algorithmic development: (1) a robotic boat system for stable and reliable in-water monitoring, (2) maritime perception to detect and track obstacles (such as buoys, and boats), and (3) navigational decision-making with multiple-obstacle avoidance and multi-objective optimization.
5/29/2024
🤿
Redefining Safety for Autonomous Vehicles
Philip Koopman, William Widen
0
0
Existing definitions and associated conceptual frameworks for computer-based system safety should be revisited in light of real-world experiences from deploying autonomous vehicles. Current terminology used by industry safety standards emphasizes mitigation of risk from specifically identified hazards, and carries assumptions based on human-supervised vehicle operation. Operation without a human driver dramatically increases the scope of safety concerns, especially due to operation in an open world environment, a requirement to self-enforce operational limits, participation in an ad hoc sociotechnical system of systems, and a requirement to conform to both legal and ethical constraints. Existing standards and terminology only partially address these new challenges. We propose updated definitions for core system safety concepts that encompass these additional considerations as a starting point for evolving safe-ty approaches to address these additional safety challenges. These results might additionally inform framing safety terminology for other autonomous system applications.
5/29/2024
✅
Safe by Design Autonomous Driving Systems
Marius Bozga, Joseph Sifakis
0
0
Developing safe autonomous driving systems is a major scientific and technical challenge. Existing AI-based end-to-end solutions do not offer the necessary safety guarantees, while traditional systems engineering approaches are defeated by the complexity of the problem. Currently, there is an increasing interest in hybrid design solutions, integrating machine learning components, when necessary, while using model-based components for goal management and planning. We study a method for building safe by design autonomous driving systems, based on the assumption that the capability to drive boils down to the coordinated execution of a given set of driving operations. The assumption is substantiated by a compositionality result considering that autopilots are dynamic systems receiving a small number of types of vistas as input, each vista defining a free space in its neighborhood. It is shown that safe driving for each type of vista in the corresponding free space, implies safe driving for any possible scenario under some easy-to-check conditions concerning the transition between vistas. The designed autopilot comprises distinct control policies one per type of vista, articulated in two consecutive phases. The first phase consists of carefully managing a potentially risky situation by virtually reducing speed, while the second phase consists of exiting the situation by accelerating. The autopilots designed use for their predictions simple functions characterizing the acceleration and deceleration capabilities of the vehicles. They cover the main driving operations, including entering a main road, overtaking, crossing intersections protected by traffic lights or signals, and driving on freeways. The results presented reinforce the case for hybrid solutions that incorporate mathematically elegant and robust decision methods that are safe by design.
5/21/2024
CoNav: A Benchmark for Human-Centered Collaborative Navigation
Changhao Li, Xinyu Sun, Peihao Chen, Jugang Fan, Zixu Wang, Yanxia Liu, Jinhui Zhu, Chuang Gan, Mingkui Tan
0
0
Human-robot collaboration, in which the robot intelligently assists the human with the upcoming task, is an appealing objective. To achieve this goal, the agent needs to be equipped with a fundamental collaborative navigation ability, where the agent should reason human intention by observing human activities and then navigate to the human's intended destination in advance of the human. However, this vital ability has not been well studied in previous literature. To fill this gap, we propose a collaborative navigation (CoNav) benchmark. Our CoNav tackles the critical challenge of constructing a 3D navigation environment with realistic and diverse human activities. To achieve this, we design a novel LLM-based humanoid animation generation framework, which is conditioned on both text descriptions and environmental context. The generated humanoid trajectory obeys the environmental context and can be easily integrated into popular simulators. We empirically find that the existing navigation methods struggle in CoNav task since they neglect the perception of human intention. To solve this problem, we propose an intention-aware agent for reasoning both long-term and short-term human intention. The agent predicts navigation action based on the predicted intention and panoramic observation. The emergent agent behavior including observing humans, avoiding human collision, and navigation reveals the efficiency of the proposed datasets and agents.
6/5/2024