Impact of Guidance and Interaction Strategies for LLM Use on Learner Performance and Perception
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Investigates the impact of guidance and interaction strategies for large language models (LLMs) on learner performance and perception
- Compares the effectiveness of "guided" vs "unguided" prompts for LLM use in educational settings
- Examines how different prompting approaches affect learning outcomes and student attitudes
Plain English Explanation
The research paper explores how the way instructions are given to students when using large language models (LLMs) can impact their learning and views on this technology. The study compared two different prompting strategies:
- Guided Prompts: Providing students with detailed guidance and structure on how to use the LLM to complete a task.
- Unguided Prompts: Giving students more open-ended instructions and letting them figure out how to use the LLM on their own.
The researchers wanted to see how these different prompting approaches affected the students' performance on the task as well as their attitudes and perceptions towards using the LLM. This is an important question as LLMs become more common in educational settings, and understanding the best ways to integrate them is crucial.
Technical Explanation
The study was conducted with university students in an introductory computer science course. Participants were randomly assigned to either the "guided prompt" or "unguided prompt" condition. In the guided prompt condition, students received step-by-step instructions on how to use the LLM to complete a coding task. In the unguided prompt condition, students were given a more open-ended task description and had to determine how to use the LLM on their own.
The researchers measured student performance on the coding task, as well as their perceptions of the LLM, including trust, perceived usefulness, and willingness to use it in the future. They found that students in the guided prompt condition performed significantly better on the coding task and had more positive perceptions of the LLM compared to those in the unguided prompt condition.
The findings suggest that providing clear guidance and structure when using LLMs in educational settings can lead to better learning outcomes and more favorable attitudes towards this technology. The authors discuss the implications for the design of AI-based tutoring systems and the importance of scaffolding student interaction with LLMs.
Critical Analysis
The study provides valuable insights into the role of prompting strategies in shaping learner experiences with LLMs. However, it is important to consider some potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
The study was conducted in a specific educational context (an introductory computer science course), so the findings may not generalize to other subject areas or age groups. More diverse samples would be needed to establish the broader applicability of the results.
-
The study focused on a single task (a coding exercise) and did not explore the impact of prompting strategies on more open-ended or complex learning activities. Further research could investigate how the findings translate to different types of educational tasks.
-
The study did not delve into the specific mechanisms by which the guided prompts led to better performance and perceptions. Additional research could explore the cognitive and metacognitive processes involved in using LLMs under different prompting conditions.
-
The long-term effects of the prompting strategies on learner engagement, skill development, and transfer of knowledge were not assessed. Longitudinal studies would be valuable to understand the sustained impact of these approaches.
Conclusion
This research paper provides important insights into the role of guidance and interaction strategies in shaping the use of large language models (LLMs) in educational contexts. The findings suggest that providing students with structured prompts and clear instructions on how to leverage LLMs can lead to improved learning outcomes and more positive perceptions of this technology.
As LLMs become increasingly integrated into educational settings, understanding the best practices for their implementation is crucial. This study highlights the need to carefully design the prompts and scaffolding that accompany the use of LLMs, in order to maximize their potential benefits for student learning and engagement. The insights from this work can inform the design of AI-based tutoring systems and the broader integration of LLMs in education.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Impact of Guidance and Interaction Strategies for LLM Use on Learner Performance and Perception
Harsh Kumar, Ilya Musabirov, Mohi Reza, Jiakai Shi, Xinyuan Wang, Joseph Jay Williams, Anastasia Kuzminykh, Michael Liut
Personalized chatbot-based teaching assistants can be crucial in addressing increasing classroom sizes, especially where direct teacher presence is limited. Large language models (LLMs) offer a promising avenue, with increasing research exploring their educational utility. However, the challenge lies not only in establishing the efficacy of LLMs but also in discerning the nuances of interaction between learners and these models, which impact learners' engagement and results. We conducted a formative study in an undergraduate computer science classroom (N=145) and a controlled experiment on Prolific (N=356) to explore the impact of four pedagogically informed guidance strategies on the learners' performance, confidence and trust in LLMs. Direct LLM answers marginally improved performance, while refining student solutions fostered trust. Structured guidance reduced random queries as well as instances of students copy-pasting assignment questions to the LLM. Our work highlights the role that teachers can play in shaping LLM-supported learning environments.
Read more8/21/2024
0
Evaluating the Effectiveness of LLMs in Introductory Computer Science Education: A Semester-Long Field Study
Wenhan Lyu (Rachel), Yimeng Wang (Rachel), Tingting (Rachel), Chung, Yifan Sun, Yixuan Zhang
The integration of AI assistants, especially through the development of Large Language Models (LLMs), into computer science education has sparked significant debate. An emerging body of work has looked into using LLMs in education, but few have examined the impacts of LLMs on students in entry-level programming courses, particularly in real-world contexts and over extended periods. To address this research gap, we conducted a semester-long, between-subjects study with 50 students using CodeTutor, an LLM-powered assistant developed by our research team. Our study results show that students who used CodeTutor (the experimental group) achieved statistically significant improvements in their final scores compared to peers who did not use the tool (the control group). Within the experimental group, those without prior experience with LLM-powered tools demonstrated significantly greater performance gain than their counterparts. We also found that students expressed positive feedback regarding CodeTutor's capability, though they also had concerns about CodeTutor's limited role in developing critical thinking skills. Over the semester, students' agreement with CodeTutor's suggestions decreased, with a growing preference for support from traditional human teaching assistants. Our analysis further reveals that the quality of user prompts was significantly correlated with CodeTutor's response effectiveness. Building upon our results, we discuss the implications of our findings for integrating Generative AI literacy into curricula to foster critical thinking skills and turn to examining the temporal dynamics of user engagement with LLM-powered tools. We further discuss the discrepancy between the anticipated functions of tools and students' actual capabilities, which sheds light on the need for tailored strategies to improve educational outcomes.
Read more5/6/2024
0
New!AI Meets the Classroom: When Does ChatGPT Harm Learning?
Matthias Lehmann, Philipp B. Cornelius, Fabian J. Sting
In this paper, we study how generative AI and specifically large language models (LLMs) impact learning in coding classes. We show across three studies that LLM usage can have positive and negative effects on learning outcomes. Using observational data from university-level programming courses, we establish such effects in the field. We replicate these findings in subsequent experimental studies, which closely resemble typical learning scenarios, to show causality. We find evidence for two contrasting mechanisms that determine the overall effect of LLM usage on learning. Students who use LLMs as personal tutors by conversing about the topic and asking for explanations benefit from usage. However, learning is impaired for students who excessively rely on LLMs to solve practice exercises for them and thus do not invest sufficient own mental effort. Those who never used LLMs before are particularly prone to such adverse behavior. Students without prior domain knowledge gain more from having access to LLMs. Finally, we show that the self-perceived benefits of using LLMs for learning exceed the actual benefits, potentially resulting in an overestimation of one's own abilities. Overall, our findings show promising potential of LLMs as learning support, however also that students have to be very cautious of possible pitfalls.
Read more9/17/2024
🐍
0
I don't trust you (anymore)! -- The effect of students' LLM use on Lecturer-Student-Trust in Higher Education
Simon Kloker, Matthew Bazanya, Twaha Kateete
Trust plays a pivotal role in Lecturer-Student-Collaboration, encompassing teaching and research aspects. The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) in platforms like Open AI's ChatGPT, coupled with their cost-effectiveness and high-quality results, has led to their rapid adoption among university students. However, discerning genuine student input from LLM-generated output poses a challenge for lecturers. This dilemma jeopardizes the trust relationship between lecturers and students, potentially impacting university downstream activities, particularly collaborative research initiatives. Despite attempts to establish guidelines for student LLM use, a clear framework mutually beneficial for lecturers and students in higher education remains elusive. This study addresses the research question: How does the use of LLMs by students impact Informational and Procedural Justice, influencing Team Trust and Expected Team Performance? Methodically, we applied a quantitative construct-based survey, evaluated using techniques of Structural Equation Modelling (PLS- SEM) to examine potential relationships among these constructs. Our findings based on 23 valid respondents from Ndejje University indicate that lecturers are less concerned about the fairness of LLM use per se but are more focused on the transparency of student utilization, which significantly influences Team Trust positively. This research contributes to the global discourse on integrating and regulating LLMs and subsequent models in education. We propose that guidelines should support LLM use while enforcing transparency in Lecturer-Student- Collaboration to foster Team Trust and Performance. The study contributes valuable insights for shaping policies enabling ethical and transparent LLMs usage in education to ensure effectiveness of collaborative learning environments.
Read more6/24/2024