AI Meets the Classroom: When Does ChatGPT Harm Learning?
1
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how students' use of ChatGPT, a popular generative AI chatbot, affects their learning when training to code.
- The study examines the impact of ChatGPT on students' coding skills, understanding of programming concepts, and overall learning outcomes.
- Researchers conducted experiments to understand the advantages and drawbacks of using ChatGPT in a learning environment.
Plain English Explanation
The paper investigates how students' use of ChatGPT, a powerful AI-powered chatbot, impacts their learning when they are training to become proficient in computer programming. The researchers wanted to understand the potential benefits and drawbacks of integrating ChatGPT into the learning process.
To do this, they designed experiments to measure the effects of ChatGPT usage on students' coding skills, their comprehension of programming concepts, and their overall learning outcomes. The goal was to provide insights into how educators and learners can effectively leverage ChatGPT to support and enhance the coding education experience, while also being mindful of any potential pitfalls.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a study that examines the impact of students' use of ChatGPT on their learning outcomes when training to code. The researchers conducted experiments to assess changes in the students' coding abilities, their understanding of programming principles, and their overall learning progress.
The experimental design involved dividing students into two groups: one that had access to ChatGPT during the coding exercises, and one that did not. The researchers then compared the performance of the two groups on various coding tasks and assessments to evaluate the influence of the AI chatbot on the students' learning.
The findings of the study shed light on the potential advantages and drawbacks of integrating large language models like ChatGPT into coding education. The researchers discussed the implications of their results and provided recommendations for effectively guiding students' interaction with such AI assistants to support their learning.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thorough and well-designed study that explores an important and timely topic in the field of educational technology. The researchers acknowledge the potential benefits of using AI-powered chatbots like ChatGPT to assist students in their coding education, but they also recognize the need to understand the potential drawbacks and limitations of such tools.
One strength of the study is the experimental design, which allows for a direct comparison between students who have access to ChatGPT and those who do not. This approach helps to isolate the impact of the AI chatbot on learning outcomes. However, the researchers could have explored additional variables, such as the frequency and context of ChatGPT usage, to provide a more nuanced understanding of the phenomena.
Another potential limitation is the scope of the study, which focuses primarily on coding skills and programming concepts. It would be valuable to investigate the effects of ChatGPT on other aspects of the learning process, such as problem-solving, critical thinking, and independent learning abilities.
Overall, the paper presents a valuable contribution to the ongoing discussion around the integration of generative AI systems in educational settings. The findings and insights provided can inform educators, policymakers, and researchers as they navigate the challenges and opportunities presented by these rapidly evolving technologies.
Conclusion
This study investigates the impact of students' use of the AI chatbot ChatGPT on their learning when training to code. The researchers conducted experiments to assess the effects on students' coding skills, understanding of programming concepts, and overall learning outcomes.
The findings shed light on both the potential benefits and drawbacks of integrating large language models like ChatGPT into coding education. The researchers provide valuable insights and recommendations for effectively guiding students' interaction with such AI assistants to support their learning and development.
As AI technology continues to advance, this study offers important contributions to the ongoing discussions around the future of learning with large language models and the implications for when and how ChatGPT may be used in the classroom.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
1
New!AI Meets the Classroom: When Does ChatGPT Harm Learning?
Matthias Lehmann, Philipp B. Cornelius, Fabian J. Sting
In this paper, we study how generative AI and specifically large language models (LLMs) impact learning in coding classes. We show across three studies that LLM usage can have positive and negative effects on learning outcomes. Using observational data from university-level programming courses, we establish such effects in the field. We replicate these findings in subsequent experimental studies, which closely resemble typical learning scenarios, to show causality. We find evidence for two contrasting mechanisms that determine the overall effect of LLM usage on learning. Students who use LLMs as personal tutors by conversing about the topic and asking for explanations benefit from usage. However, learning is impaired for students who excessively rely on LLMs to solve practice exercises for them and thus do not invest sufficient own mental effort. Those who never used LLMs before are particularly prone to such adverse behavior. Students without prior domain knowledge gain more from having access to LLMs. Finally, we show that the self-perceived benefits of using LLMs for learning exceed the actual benefits, potentially resulting in an overestimation of one's own abilities. Overall, our findings show promising potential of LLMs as learning support, however also that students have to be very cautious of possible pitfalls.
Read more9/17/2024
💬
0
The GPT Surprise: Offering Large Language Model Chat in a Massive Coding Class Reduced Engagement but Increased Adopters Exam Performances
Allen Nie, Yash Chandak, Miroslav Suzara, Malika Ali, Juliette Woodrow, Matt Peng, Mehran Sahami, Emma Brunskill, Chris Piech
Large language models (LLMs) are quickly being adopted in a wide range of learning experiences, especially via ubiquitous and broadly accessible chat interfaces like ChatGPT and Copilot. This type of interface is readily available to students and teachers around the world, yet relatively little research has been done to assess the impact of such generic tools on student learning. Coding education is an interesting test case, both because LLMs have strong performance on coding tasks, and because LLM-powered support tools are rapidly becoming part of the workflow of professional software engineers. To help understand the impact of generic LLM use on coding education, we conducted a large-scale randomized control trial with 5,831 students from 146 countries in an online coding class in which we provided some students with access to a chat interface with GPT-4. We estimate positive benefits on exam performance for adopters, the students who used the tool, but over all students, the advertisement of GPT-4 led to a significant average decrease in exam participation. We observe similar decreases in other forms of course engagement. However, this decrease is modulated by the student's country of origin. Offering access to LLMs to students from low human development index countries increased their exam participation rate on average. Our results suggest there may be promising benefits to using LLMs in an introductory coding class, but also potential harms for engagement, which makes their longer term impact on student success unclear. Our work highlights the need for additional investigations to help understand the potential impact of future adoption and integration of LLMs into classrooms.
Read more7/16/2024
💬
0
The Future of Learning: Large Language Models through the Lens of Students
He Zhang, Jingyi Xie, Chuhao Wu, Jie Cai, ChanMin Kim, John M. Carroll
As Large-Scale Language Models (LLMs) continue to evolve, they demonstrate significant enhancements in performance and an expansion of functionalities, impacting various domains, including education. In this study, we conducted interviews with 14 students to explore their everyday interactions with ChatGPT. Our preliminary findings reveal that students grapple with the dilemma of utilizing ChatGPT's efficiency for learning and information seeking, while simultaneously experiencing a crisis of trust and ethical concerns regarding the outcomes and broader impacts of ChatGPT. The students perceive ChatGPT as being more human-like compared to traditional AI. This dilemma, characterized by mixed emotions, inconsistent behaviors, and an overall positive attitude towards ChatGPT, underscores its potential for beneficial applications in education and learning. However, we argue that despite its human-like qualities, the advanced capabilities of such intelligence might lead to adverse consequences. Therefore, it's imperative to approach its application cautiously and strive to mitigate potential harms in future developments.
Read more7/18/2024
💬
0
Experiences from Integrating Large Language Model Chatbots into the Classroom
Arto Hellas, Juho Leinonen, Leo Leppanen
In the present study, we provided students an unfiltered access to a state-of-the-art large language model (LLM) chatbot. The chatbot was intentionally designed to mimic proprietary commercial chatbots such as ChatGPT where the chatbot has not been tailored for the educational context; the underlying engine was OpenAI GPT-4. The chatbot was integrated into online learning materials of three courses. One of the courses focused on software engineering with LLMs, while the two other courses were not directly related to LLMs. Our results suggest that only a minority of students engage with the chatbot in the courses that do not relate to LLMs. At the same time, unsurprisingly, nearly all students in the LLM-focused course leveraged the chatbot. In all courses, the majority of the LLM usage came from a few superusers, whereas the majority of the students did not heavily use the chatbot even though it was readily available and effectively provided a free access to the OpenAI GPT-4 model. We also observe that in addition to students using the chatbot for course-specific purposes, many use the chatbot for their own purposes. These results suggest that the worst fears of educators -- all students overrelying on LLMs -- did not materialize even when the chatbot access was unfiltered. We finally discuss potential reasons for the low usage, suggesting the need for more tailored and scaffolded LLM experiences targeted for specific types of student use cases.
Read more6/10/2024