Impact of unreliable devices on stability of quantum computations

Overview

• NISQ devices are valuable for testing quantum computing, but susceptible to errors from decoherence, leakage, cross-talk, and other noise sources.
• This raises concerns about the stability of results from NISQ devices, as error mitigation strategies require well-characterized and stationary error models.
• The paper aims to quantify the reliability of NISQ devices by assessing the necessary conditions for generating stable results within a given tolerance.

Plain English Explanation

Quantum computers have the potential to solve certain problems much faster than classical computers, but they are very delicate and prone to errors. These "noisy intermediate-scale quantum" (NISQ) devices are valuable platforms for exploring the fundamentals of quantum computing, but the errors they experience can undermine the reliability of the results.

The researchers in this paper wanted to understand how much we can trust the outputs of NISQ devices. They used mathematical techniques to measure the stability of the results from a 5-qubit quantum circuit running the Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm. By analyzing data from the IBM Washington quantum computer over a period of 15 months, they found that the reliability of the device fluctuated between 41% and 92% - far exceeding the maximum 2.2% threshold needed for stable, consistent results.

This means that the NISQ device was not reliable enough to consistently reproduce the correct statistical average when running the Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm. The errors and noise in the system were too unpredictable and variable to trust the outputs without further mitigation strategies. This is an important limitation to keep in mind when using current NISQ devices for practical applications.

Technical Explanation

The researchers used similarity metrics derived from device characterization data to quantify the reliability and stability of a 5-qubit implementation of the Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm on an IBM quantum computer. They analyzed noise data collected from the IBM Washington device over 15 months, from January 2022 to April 2023.

The simulation experiments revealed that the reliability metric - a measure of how consistently the device could reproduce the expected statistical mean - fluctuated between 41% and 92% during this time period. This wide variation significantly exceeds the maximum allowable threshold of 2.2% needed for stable, reliable outcomes.

The implication is that the NISQ device was not dependable enough to consistently generate accurate results for the Bernstein-Vazirani circuit. The researchers attribute this to the unpredictable and non-stationary nature of the errors and noise present in the quantum system, which undermines strategies for mitigating errors and obtaining trustworthy outputs.

Critical Analysis

The paper highlights an important limitation of current NISQ devices - their inherent unreliability due to the complex and variable nature of quantum errors. While the researchers were able to quantify this instability using sophisticated mathematical techniques, the fact remains that NISQ devices are highly susceptible to errors that cannot be easily accounted for or mitigated.

One could argue that the specific conditions of the Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm may have exacerbated the instability issues, and that other quantum circuits may exhibit better reliability. However, the general takeaway is that NISQ devices cannot be trusted to consistently produce accurate results without significant advances in error correction and modeling the impact of circuit imperfections.

Further research is needed to better understand the sources of variability in NISQ devices and develop more robust error mitigation strategies. Additionally, the field may need to rethink the role of NISQ devices in the near-term, focusing more on fundamental research and less on practical applications that require reliable, consistent outputs.

Conclusion

This paper underscores the inherent unreliability of current NISQ devices, which are susceptible to unpredictable errors and noise that undermine their ability to consistently reproduce expected results. The researchers' analysis of a 5-qubit implementation of the Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm revealed significant fluctuations in the device's reliability, far exceeding the threshold needed for stable, trustworthy outputs.

These findings highlight the significant challenges that must be overcome before NISQ devices can be reliably used for practical quantum computing applications. Continued research is needed to better understand and mitigate the sources of variability in these systems, paving the way for more robust and dependable quantum technologies in the future.