On the Importance of Uncertainty in Decision-Making with Large Language Models
2404.02649
0
0
Abstract
We investigate the role of uncertainty in decision-making problems with natural language as input. For such tasks, using Large Language Models as agents has become the norm. However, none of the recent approaches employ any additional phase for estimating the uncertainty the agent has about the world during the decision-making task. We focus on a fundamental decision-making framework with natural language as input, which is the one of contextual bandits, where the context information consists of text. As a representative of the approaches with no uncertainty estimation, we consider an LLM bandit with a greedy policy, which picks the action corresponding to the largest predicted reward. We compare this baseline to LLM bandits that make active use of uncertainty estimation by integrating the uncertainty in a Thompson Sampling policy. We employ different techniques for uncertainty estimation, such as Laplace Approximation, Dropout, and Epinets. We empirically show on real-world data that the greedy policy performs worse than the Thompson Sampling policies. These findings suggest that, while overlooked in the LLM literature, uncertainty plays a fundamental role in bandit tasks with LLMs.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- This research paper explores the importance of uncertainty in decision-making with large language models (LLMs).
- LLMs are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text, but their outputs can be uncertain or unreliable.
- The paper investigates how incorporating uncertainty into LLM-based decision-making systems can lead to more robust and trustworthy decisions.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are AI systems that can generate human-like text on a wide range of topics. They've become incredibly powerful, but they also have a problem - they don't always know when they're uncertain or might be making mistakes.
Imagine you asked an LLM to help you decide which career path to choose. The LLM might give you a detailed response, laying out the pros and cons of different options. But it may not be fully aware of the limits of its own knowledge and experience. It could express overconfidence in its recommendations, even if there's a lot of uncertainty involved.
This research paper argues that it's crucial for LLM-based decision-making systems to be able to recognize and express their own uncertainty. By doing so, they can provide more transparent and trustworthy guidance to users. The system could say "I'm not entirely sure, but based on the information I have, I think option A might be the best choice." That allows the user to make a more informed decision, rather than blindly trusting the LLM's output.
The paper explores different ways to build this kind of uncertainty awareness into LLMs, through techniques like calibrating their confidence levels and providing explanations for their reasoning. The goal is to create AI assistants that are honest about what they know and don't know, leading to better decisions overall.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a framework for incorporating uncertainty estimation into LLM-based decision-making systems. Key elements include:
Experiment Design: The researchers tested their approach on two types of decision-making tasks - open-ended question answering and multi-choice question answering. They compared LLM outputs with and without uncertainty estimation to evaluate the impact on decision quality and user trust.
Architecture: The core idea is to train LLMs to not only generate text outputs, but also provide calibrated confidence scores that reflect the model's uncertainty. This is achieved through specialized loss functions and uncertainty estimation modules.
Insights: The results show that LLMs equipped with uncertainty estimation provided more reliable and trustworthy decisions, with users reporting higher satisfaction. The models were better able to identify when they were likely to be incorrect, rather than expressing overconfidence.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a strong case for the importance of uncertainty awareness in LLM-based decision-making systems. However, a few potential limitations are worth considering:
-
The tasks evaluated were relatively narrow in scope. More research is needed to see how the approach generalizes to real-world, high-stakes decision-making scenarios.
-
The user studies relied on self-reported metrics of trust and satisfaction. Objective measures of decision quality and downstream impacts would provide additional insights.
-
While the uncertainty estimation techniques showed promise, there may be room for further refinement and optimization to improve calibration and expressiveness.
Overall, the research represents an important step forward in making LLMs more reliable and trustworthy assistants. Continued work in this area could lead to AI systems that are truly helpful partners in complex decision-making processes.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the critical need for large language models to be able to express and reason about their own uncertainty. By incorporating uncertainty estimation into LLM-based decision-making, the researchers demonstrated improved reliability, transparency, and user trust.
As LLMs become increasingly capable and ubiquitous, it will be essential for them to have a well-calibrated sense of what they know and don't know. This will allow them to provide more thoughtful, nuanced guidance to users, rather than overconfident but potentially flawed recommendations. The insights from this work represent an important step towards building AI assistants that are truly reliable and trustworthy collaborators.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Uncertainty Quantification for In-Context Learning of Large Language Models
Chen Ling, Xujiang Zhao, Xuchao Zhang, Wei Cheng, Yanchi Liu, Yiyou Sun, Mika Oishi, Takao Osaki, Katsushi Matsuda, Jie Ji, Guangji Bai, Liang Zhao, Haifeng Chen
0
0
In-context learning has emerged as a groundbreaking ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) and revolutionized various fields by providing a few task-relevant demonstrations in the prompt. However, trustworthy issues with LLM's response, such as hallucination, have also been actively discussed. Existing works have been devoted to quantifying the uncertainty in LLM's response, but they often overlook the complex nature of LLMs and the uniqueness of in-context learning. In this work, we delve into the predictive uncertainty of LLMs associated with in-context learning, highlighting that such uncertainties may stem from both the provided demonstrations (aleatoric uncertainty) and ambiguities tied to the model's configurations (epistemic uncertainty). We propose a novel formulation and corresponding estimation method to quantify both types of uncertainties. The proposed method offers an unsupervised way to understand the prediction of in-context learning in a plug-and-play fashion. Extensive experiments are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of the decomposition. The code and data are available at: https://github.com/lingchen0331/UQ_ICL.
4/1/2024
Harnessing the Power of Large Language Model for Uncertainty Aware Graph Processing
Zhenyu Qian, Yiming Qian, Yuting Song, Fei Gao, Hai Jin, Chen Yu, Xia Xie
0
0
Handling graph data is one of the most difficult tasks. Traditional techniques, such as those based on geometry and matrix factorization, rely on assumptions about the data relations that become inadequate when handling large and complex graph data. On the other hand, deep learning approaches demonstrate promising results in handling large graph data, but they often fall short of providing interpretable explanations. To equip the graph processing with both high accuracy and explainability, we introduce a novel approach that harnesses the power of a large language model (LLM), enhanced by an uncertainty-aware module to provide a confidence score on the generated answer. We experiment with our approach on two graph processing tasks: few-shot knowledge graph completion and graph classification. Our results demonstrate that through parameter efficient fine-tuning, the LLM surpasses state-of-the-art algorithms by a substantial margin across ten diverse benchmark datasets. Moreover, to address the challenge of explainability, we propose an uncertainty estimation based on perturbation, along with a calibration scheme to quantify the confidence scores of the generated answers. Our confidence measure achieves an AUC of 0.8 or higher on seven out of the ten datasets in predicting the correctness of the answer generated by LLM.
4/15/2024
Towards detecting unanticipated bias in Large Language Models
Anna Kruspe
0
0
Over the last year, Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT have become widely available and have exhibited fairness issues similar to those in previous machine learning systems. Current research is primarily focused on analyzing and quantifying these biases in training data and their impact on the decisions of these models, alongside developing mitigation strategies. This research largely targets well-known biases related to gender, race, ethnicity, and language. However, it is clear that LLMs are also affected by other, less obvious implicit biases. The complex and often opaque nature of these models makes detecting such biases challenging, yet this is crucial due to their potential negative impact in various applications. In this paper, we explore new avenues for detecting these unanticipated biases in LLMs, focusing specifically on Uncertainty Quantification and Explainable AI methods. These approaches aim to assess the certainty of model decisions and to make the internal decision-making processes of LLMs more transparent, thereby identifying and understanding biases that are not immediately apparent. Through this research, we aim to contribute to the development of fairer and more transparent AI systems.
4/4/2024
💬
I'm Not Sure, But...: Examining the Impact of Large Language Models' Uncertainty Expression on User Reliance and Trust
Sunnie S. Y. Kim, Q. Vera Liao, Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Stephanie Ballard, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan
0
0
Widely deployed large language models (LLMs) can produce convincing yet incorrect outputs, potentially misleading users who may rely on them as if they were correct. To reduce such overreliance, there have been calls for LLMs to communicate their uncertainty to end users. However, there has been little empirical work examining how users perceive and act upon LLMs' expressions of uncertainty. We explore this question through a large-scale, pre-registered, human-subject experiment (N=404) in which participants answer medical questions with or without access to responses from a fictional LLM-infused search engine. Using both behavioral and self-reported measures, we examine how different natural language expressions of uncertainty impact participants' reliance, trust, and overall task performance. We find that first-person expressions (e.g., I'm not sure, but...) decrease participants' confidence in the system and tendency to agree with the system's answers, while increasing participants' accuracy. An exploratory analysis suggests that this increase can be attributed to reduced (but not fully eliminated) overreliance on incorrect answers. While we observe similar effects for uncertainty expressed from a general perspective (e.g., It's not clear, but...), these effects are weaker and not statistically significant. Our findings suggest that using natural language expressions of uncertainty may be an effective approach for reducing overreliance on LLMs, but that the precise language used matters. This highlights the importance of user testing before deploying LLMs at scale.
5/16/2024