Improved Regret for Bandit Convex Optimization with Delayed Feedback

Read original: arXiv:2402.09152 - Published 6/26/2024 by Yuanyu Wan, Chang Yao, Mingli Song, Lijun Zhang
Total Score

0

🛠️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper investigates a type of optimization problem called "bandit convex optimization (BCO) with delayed feedback."
  • In this problem, the loss value of an action is only revealed after an arbitrary delay, rather than immediately.
  • The authors aim to improve upon the previous best regret bounds (a measure of performance) for this problem.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at a particular type of optimization problem where you have to make decisions (actions) and receive a "loss" value for each decision, but the loss value is not revealed until some time later. This delay in feedback is a common challenge in many real-world optimization problems.

The authors develop a new algorithm that can achieve better performance (lower regret) compared to previous approaches, especially when the average delay is close to the maximum possible delay. The key idea is to carefully incorporate the delayed feedback in a way that decouples the effects of the delays and the limited feedback.

For strongly convex functions, the algorithm can further improve the regret bounds. And for unconstrained action sets, the algorithm can achieve even better regret bounds for strongly convex and smooth functions.

Technical Explanation

The paper investigates bandit convex optimization (BCO) with delayed feedback, where the loss value of an action is only revealed after an arbitrary delay. Let $n, T, \bar{d}$ denote the dimensionality, time horizon, and average delay, respectively.

Previous studies have achieved an $O(\sqrt{n}T^{3/4} + (n\bar{d})^{1/3}T^{2/3})$ regret bound for this problem, where the delay-independent part matches the regret of the classical non-delayed bandit gradient descent algorithm. However, there was a large gap between this bound and an existing $\Omega(\sqrt{\bar{d}T})$ lower bound.

The authors show that this gap can be filled in the worst case, where $\bar{d}$ is very close to the maximum delay $d$. They develop a novel algorithm and prove that it enjoys a regret bound of $O(\sqrt{n}T^{3/4} + \sqrt{dT})$, which is better than the previous result for $d = O((n\bar{d})^{2/3}T^{1/3})$. The delay-dependent part of this bound is also shown to be tight in the worst case.

The key idea is to decouple the joint effect of the delays and the bandit feedback on the regret by carefully incorporating the delayed bandit feedback with a blocking update mechanism.

For strongly convex functions, the authors show that the proposed algorithm can improve the regret bound to $O((nT)^{2/3}\log^{1/3}T + d\log T)$. And if the action sets are unconstrained, the algorithm can achieve an $O(n\sqrt{T\log T} + d\log T)$ regret bound for strongly convex and smooth functions.

Critical Analysis

The paper addresses an important problem in the field of online optimization with delayed feedback, which has many real-world applications. The authors provide a novel algorithm that significantly improves upon the state of the art, particularly in the worst-case scenario where the average delay is close to the maximum delay.

One potential limitation of the research is that it assumes the delays are arbitrary and independent of the actions taken. In practice, the delays may be correlated with the actions or the environment, which could affect the performance of the proposed algorithm.

Additionally, the paper does not consider the scenario where the delay distribution changes over time, which is another common challenge in real-world optimization problems. Extending the algorithm to handle non-stationary delays could be an interesting avenue for future research.

Conclusion

This paper presents a significant advancement in the field of bandit convex optimization with delayed feedback. The authors' novel algorithm achieves state-of-the-art regret bounds, particularly in the worst-case scenario where the average delay is close to the maximum delay.

The techniques developed in this research, such as the blocking update mechanism, could potentially be applied to other optimization problems with delayed or partial feedback. The improved understanding of the limitations and trade-offs in this problem setting can also inform the design of more efficient algorithms for real-world applications, such as online recommendation systems or adaptive control.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🛠️

Total Score

0

Improved Regret for Bandit Convex Optimization with Delayed Feedback

Yuanyu Wan, Chang Yao, Mingli Song, Lijun Zhang

We investigate bandit convex optimization (BCO) with delayed feedback, where only the loss value of the action is revealed under an arbitrary delay. Let $n,T,bar{d}$ denote the dimensionality, time horizon, and average delay, respectively. Previous studies have achieved an $O(sqrt{n}T^{3/4}+(nbar{d})^{1/3}T^{2/3})$ regret bound for this problem, whose delay-independent part matches the regret of the classical non-delayed bandit gradient descent algorithm. However, there is a large gap between its delay-dependent part, i.e., $O((nbar{d})^{1/3}T^{2/3})$, and an existing $Omega(sqrt{bar{d}T})$ lower bound. In this paper, we illustrate that this gap can be filled in the worst case, where $bar{d}$ is very close to the maximum delay $d$. Specifically, we first develop a novel algorithm, and prove that it enjoys a regret bound of $O(sqrt{n}T^{3/4}+sqrt{dT})$ in general. Compared with the previous result, our regret bound is better for $d=O((nbar{d})^{2/3}T^{1/3})$, and the delay-dependent part is tight in the worst case. The primary idea is to decouple the joint effect of the delays and the bandit feedback on the regret by carefully incorporating the delayed bandit feedback with a blocking update mechanism. Furthermore, we show that the proposed algorithm can improve the regret bound to $O((nT)^{2/3}log^{1/3}T+dlog T)$ for strongly convex functions. Finally, if the action sets are unconstrained, we demonstrate that it can be simply extended to achieve an $O(nsqrt{Tlog T}+dlog T)$ regret bound for strongly convex and smooth functions.

Read more

6/26/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Non-stationary Online Convex Optimization with Arbitrary Delays

Yuanyu Wan, Chang Yao, Mingli Song, Lijun Zhang

Online convex optimization (OCO) with arbitrary delays, in which gradients or other information of functions could be arbitrarily delayed, has received increasing attention recently. Different from previous studies that focus on stationary environments, this paper investigates the delayed OCO in non-stationary environments, and aims to minimize the dynamic regret with respect to any sequence of comparators. To this end, we first propose a simple algorithm, namely DOGD, which performs a gradient descent step for each delayed gradient according to their arrival order. Despite its simplicity, our novel analysis shows that the dynamic regret of DOGD can be automatically bounded by $O(sqrt{bar{d}T}(P_T+1))$ under mild assumptions, and $O(sqrt{dT}(P_T+1))$ in the worst case, where $bar{d}$ and $d$ denote the average and maximum delay respectively, $T$ is the time horizon, and $P_T$ is the path-length of comparators. Furthermore, we develop an improved algorithm, which reduces those dynamic regret bounds achieved by DOGD to $O(sqrt{bar{d}T(P_T+1)})$ and $O(sqrt{dT(P_T+1)})$, respectively. The key idea is to run multiple DOGD with different learning rates, and utilize a meta-algorithm to track the best one based on their delayed performance. Finally, we demonstrate that our improved algorithm is optimal in the worst case by deriving a matching lower bound.

Read more

6/26/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Online Newton Method for Bandit Convex Optimisation

Hidde Fokkema, Dirk van der Hoeven, Tor Lattimore, Jack J. Mayo

We introduce a computationally efficient algorithm for zeroth-order bandit convex optimisation and prove that in the adversarial setting its regret is at most $d^{3.5} sqrt{n} mathrm{polylog}(n, d)$ with high probability where $d$ is the dimension and $n$ is the time horizon. In the stochastic setting the bound improves to $M d^{2} sqrt{n} mathrm{polylog}(n, d)$ where $M in [d^{-1/2}, d^{-1 / 4}]$ is a constant that depends on the geometry of the constraint set and the desired computational properties.

Read more

6/11/2024

🔍

Total Score

0

A Best-of-both-worlds Algorithm for Bandits with Delayed Feedback with Robustness to Excessive Delays

Saeed Masoudian, Julian Zimmert, Yevgeny Seldin

We propose a new best-of-both-worlds algorithm for bandits with variably delayed feedback. In contrast to prior work, which required prior knowledge of the maximal delay $d_{mathrm{max}}$ and had a linear dependence of the regret on it, our algorithm can tolerate arbitrary excessive delays up to order $T$ (where $T$ is the time horizon). The algorithm is based on three technical innovations, which may all be of independent interest: (1) We introduce the first implicit exploration scheme that works in best-of-both-worlds setting. (2) We introduce the first control of distribution drift that does not rely on boundedness of delays. The control is based on the implicit exploration scheme and adaptive skipping of observations with excessive delays. (3) We introduce a procedure relating standard regret with drifted regret that does not rely on boundedness of delays. At the conceptual level, we demonstrate that complexity of best-of-both-worlds bandits with delayed feedback is characterized by the amount of information missing at the time of decision making (measured by the number of outstanding observations) rather than the time that the information is missing (measured by the delays).

Read more

5/29/2024