Non-stationary Online Convex Optimization with Arbitrary Delays

Read original: arXiv:2305.12131 - Published 6/26/2024 by Yuanyu Wan, Chang Yao, Mingli Song, Lijun Zhang
Total Score

0

🛠️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper investigates online convex optimization (OCO) with arbitrary delays, where gradients or other information about the objective functions can be delayed.
  • Unlike previous studies that focused on stationary environments, this research examines non-stationary environments and aims to minimize the dynamic regret with respect to any sequence of comparators.
  • The paper proposes two algorithms, DOGD and an improved algorithm, and analyzes their dynamic regret bounds.

Plain English Explanation

In online convex optimization (OCO), an agent tries to optimize a sequence of convex functions over time. This is useful in various applications, such as portfolio management and recommendation systems.

Traditionally, OCO research has assumed that the agent can access the current function's gradient or other information immediately. However, in many real-world scenarios, there may be delays in receiving this information. This paper investigates OCO in situations where the gradients or other function information can be arbitrarily delayed.

Rather than focusing on stationary environments, where the objective functions don't change over time, the researchers look at non-stationary environments, where the functions can vary. Their goal is to minimize the "dynamic regret," which measures how well the agent's decisions perform compared to the best sequence of decisions in hindsight.

To address this problem, the researchers propose two algorithms. The first, called DOGD, simply performs a gradient descent step for each delayed gradient as it arrives. Despite its simplicity, DOGD can achieve strong dynamic regret bounds under certain assumptions.

The second, more advanced algorithm, builds on DOGD by running multiple versions of it in parallel with different learning rates. It then uses a meta-algorithm to track the best-performing version based on their delayed performance. This approach further improves the dynamic regret bounds achieved by the simpler DOGD algorithm.

The key insights from this research are that it is possible to optimize effectively in non-stationary environments with delayed information, and that carefully designed algorithms can achieve strong theoretical guarantees in terms of dynamic regret.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes two algorithms for online convex optimization (OCO) with arbitrary delays:

  1. DOGD (Delayed Online Gradient Descent): This simple algorithm performs a gradient descent step for each delayed gradient as it arrives, in the order they are received.

  2. Improved Algorithm: This builds on DOGD by running multiple versions of it in parallel, each with a different learning rate. A meta-algorithm is then used to track the best-performing version based on their delayed performance.

The researchers analyze the dynamic regret of these algorithms, which measures how well the agent's decisions perform compared to the best sequence of decisions in hindsight, even in non-stationary environments.

For DOGD, they show that the dynamic regret can be bounded by $O(√(bar_d T)(P_T + 1))$ under mild assumptions, and $O(√(d T)(P_T + 1))$ in the worst case. Here, bar_d and d denote the average and maximum delay, respectively, T is the time horizon, and P_T is the path-length of the comparators.

The improved algorithm further reduces these bounds to $O(√(bar_d T(P_T + 1)))$ and $O(√(d T(P_T + 1)))$, respectively. The key idea is to leverage the delayed performance of multiple DOGD instances to track the best one.

Finally, the researchers show that their improved algorithm is optimal in the worst case by deriving a matching lower bound.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes several notable contributions to the field of online convex optimization with delayed information:

  1. It extends the existing research, which has primarily focused on stationary environments, to non-stationary settings.
  2. The proposed algorithms, DOGD and the improved algorithm, achieve strong theoretical guarantees in terms of dynamic regret, even with arbitrary delays.
  3. The analysis provides insights into the role of average and maximum delays, as well as the path-length of comparators, in determining the achievable dynamic regret bounds.

However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  • The paper assumes that the delayed gradients or function information are still useful for optimization, which may not always be the case in practice.
  • The analysis does not consider the computational or memory overhead of running multiple DOGD instances in parallel, which could be a concern for large-scale problems.
  • It would be interesting to explore the performance of these algorithms in specific application domains, such as online learning or reinforcement learning, where delayed information is common.

Overall, this research represents a significant advancement in the understanding and optimization of online convex problems with arbitrary delays, and the proposed algorithms provide a solid foundation for further developments in this area.

Conclusion

This paper investigates online convex optimization (OCO) in non-stationary environments with arbitrary delays in the gradients or other function information. It proposes two algorithms, DOGD and an improved algorithm, and analyzes their dynamic regret bounds.

The key insights are that effective optimization is possible even with delayed information, and that carefully designed algorithms can achieve strong theoretical guarantees. This research advances the state-of-the-art in OCO and has potential implications for a wide range of applications, from portfolio management to recommendation systems, where dealing with delayed or asynchronous information is a common challenge.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🛠️

Total Score

0

Non-stationary Online Convex Optimization with Arbitrary Delays

Yuanyu Wan, Chang Yao, Mingli Song, Lijun Zhang

Online convex optimization (OCO) with arbitrary delays, in which gradients or other information of functions could be arbitrarily delayed, has received increasing attention recently. Different from previous studies that focus on stationary environments, this paper investigates the delayed OCO in non-stationary environments, and aims to minimize the dynamic regret with respect to any sequence of comparators. To this end, we first propose a simple algorithm, namely DOGD, which performs a gradient descent step for each delayed gradient according to their arrival order. Despite its simplicity, our novel analysis shows that the dynamic regret of DOGD can be automatically bounded by $O(sqrt{bar{d}T}(P_T+1))$ under mild assumptions, and $O(sqrt{dT}(P_T+1))$ in the worst case, where $bar{d}$ and $d$ denote the average and maximum delay respectively, $T$ is the time horizon, and $P_T$ is the path-length of comparators. Furthermore, we develop an improved algorithm, which reduces those dynamic regret bounds achieved by DOGD to $O(sqrt{bar{d}T(P_T+1)})$ and $O(sqrt{dT(P_T+1)})$, respectively. The key idea is to run multiple DOGD with different learning rates, and utilize a meta-algorithm to track the best one based on their delayed performance. Finally, we demonstrate that our improved algorithm is optimal in the worst case by deriving a matching lower bound.

Read more

6/26/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Optimal Algorithms for Online Convex Optimization with Adversarial Constraints

Abhishek Sinha, Rahul Vaze

A well-studied generalization of the standard online convex optimization (OCO) is constrained online convex optimization (COCO). In COCO, on every round, a convex cost function and a convex constraint function are revealed to the learner after the action for that round is chosen. The objective is to design an online policy that simultaneously achieves a small regret while ensuring a small cumulative constraint violation (CCV) against an adaptive adversary interacting over a horizon of length $T$. A long-standing open question in COCO is whether an online policy can simultaneously achieve $O(sqrt{T})$ regret and $O(sqrt{T})$ CCV without any restrictive assumptions. For the first time, we answer this in the affirmative and show that an online policy can simultaneously achieve $O(sqrt{T})$ regret and $tilde{O}(sqrt{T})$ CCV. Furthermore, in the case of strongly convex cost and convex constraint functions, the regret guarantee can be improved to $O(log T)$ while keeping the CCV bound the same as above. We establish these results by effectively combining the adaptive regret bound of the AdaGrad algorithm with Lyapunov optimization - a classic tool from control theory. Surprisingly, the analysis is short and elegant.

Read more

5/27/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Tight Bounds for Online Convex Optimization with Adversarial Constraints

Abhishek Sinha, Rahul Vaze

A well-studied generalization of the standard online convex optimization (OCO) is constrained online convex optimization (COCO). In COCO, on every round, a convex cost function and a convex constraint function are revealed to the learner after the action for that round is chosen. The objective is to design an online policy that simultaneously achieves a small regret while ensuring small cumulative constraint violation (CCV) against an adaptive adversary. A long-standing open question in COCO is whether an online policy can simultaneously achieve $O(sqrt{T})$ regret and $O(sqrt{T})$ CCV without any restrictive assumptions. For the first time, we answer this in the affirmative and show that an online policy can simultaneously achieve $O(sqrt{T})$ regret and $tilde{O}(sqrt{T})$ CCV. We establish this result by effectively combining the adaptive regret bound of the AdaGrad algorithm with Lyapunov optimization - a classic tool from control theory. Surprisingly, the analysis is short and elegant.

Read more

5/16/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Adaptivity and Non-stationarity: Problem-dependent Dynamic Regret for Online Convex Optimization

Peng Zhao, Yu-Jie Zhang, Lijun Zhang, Zhi-Hua Zhou

We investigate online convex optimization in non-stationary environments and choose dynamic regret as the performance measure, defined as the difference between cumulative loss incurred by the online algorithm and that of any feasible comparator sequence. Let $T$ be the time horizon and $P_T$ be the path length that essentially reflects the non-stationarity of environments, the state-of-the-art dynamic regret is $mathcal{O}(sqrt{T(1+P_T)})$. Although this bound is proved to be minimax optimal for convex functions, in this paper, we demonstrate that it is possible to further enhance the guarantee for some easy problem instances, particularly when online functions are smooth. Specifically, we introduce novel online algorithms that can exploit smoothness and replace the dependence on $T$ in dynamic regret with problem-dependent quantities: the variation in gradients of loss functions, the cumulative loss of the comparator sequence, and the minimum of these two terms. These quantities are at most $mathcal{O}(T)$ while could be much smaller in benign environments. Therefore, our results are adaptive to the intrinsic difficulty of the problem, since the bounds are tighter than existing results for easy problems and meanwhile safeguard the same rate in the worst case. Notably, our proposed algorithms can achieve favorable dynamic regret with only one gradient per iteration, sharing the same gradient query complexity as the static regret minimization methods. To accomplish this, we introduce the collaborative online ensemble framework. The proposed framework employs a two-layer online ensemble to handle non-stationarity, and uses optimistic online learning and further introduces crucial correction terms to enable effective collaboration within the meta-base two layers, thereby attaining adaptivity. We believe the framework can be useful for broader problems.

Read more

4/9/2024