Improving Composed Image Retrieval via Contrastive Learning with Scaling Positives and Negatives

Overview

• This paper proposes a contrastive learning approach to improve composed image retrieval, which involves finding relevant images that match a combination of visual elements.
• The key ideas are scaling the positive and negative samples during training to better capture the relationships between composed images.
• The authors conduct extensive experiments on multiple datasets to demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach compared to prior methods.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on the task of composed image retrieval, where the goal is to find images that match a combination of visual elements, such as a person wearing a certain type of clothing in a particular setting. This is a challenging problem because the relationships between the individual visual elements need to be learned effectively.

The authors propose a contrastive learning approach to address this challenge. Contrastive learning is a technique that encourages the model to learn representations that bring together similar images (e.g., images with the same visual elements) and push apart dissimilar images. The key innovation in this paper is scaling the positive and negative samples during training. This means that the model is trained to pay more attention to the relationships between the composed visual elements, rather than just recognizing the individual elements.

Through extensive experiments on multiple datasets, the authors show that their approach outperforms previous methods for composed image retrieval. This suggests that the scaling of positive and negative samples during contrastive learning can be an effective way to capture the complex relationships between visual elements in composed images.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a contrastive learning approach for composed image retrieval, called Scaling Positives and Negatives (SPN). The core idea is to scale the positive and negative samples during the contrastive loss computation to better capture the relationships between the individual visual elements in a composed image.

Specifically, the authors use a contrastive loss function that encourages the model to bring together images with the same composed visual elements (positives) and push apart images with different composed visual elements (negatives). The scaling is applied to both the positive and negative samples, with the goal of increasing the importance of the relationships between the elements compared to just recognizing the individual elements.

The authors experiment with several different scaling strategies, including linear scaling, exponential scaling, and log-based scaling, and find that the log-based scaling approach performs the best. They also explore various ways of constructing the positive and negative samples, such as using query-level and instance-level comparisons.

The proposed SPN approach is evaluated on multiple datasets for composed image retrieval, including Flickr-Centered Composition Dataset (FCCD), Composed Image Retrieval (CIR) Dataset, and Flickr30k Entities. The results show that SPN consistently outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed contrastive learning approach with scaled positive and negative samples.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and thorough study on improving composed image retrieval using contrastive learning with scaled positive and negative samples. The authors have carefully considered various scaling strategies and sample construction methods, and their experiments provide strong evidence for the effectiveness of the proposed SPN approach.

One potential limitation of the work is that it primarily focuses on improving the retrieval performance, without delving deep into the interpretability or explainability of the learned representations. It would be interesting to see how the scaled positive and negative samples impact the model's understanding of the relationships between visual elements in composed images.

Additionally, the paper does not discuss the computational complexity or inference time of the SPN approach compared to previous methods. This information would be useful for understanding the practical implications of deploying the proposed technique in real-world applications.

Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of composed image retrieval and provides a strong foundation for further research in this area. The authors' insights on the importance of scaling positive and negative samples during contrastive learning could also have broader implications for other computer vision tasks involving complex relationships between visual elements.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel contrastive learning approach, called Scaling Positives and Negatives (SPN), for improving composed image retrieval. The key idea is to scale the positive and negative samples during the contrastive loss computation to better capture the relationships between the individual visual elements in a composed image.

Through extensive experiments on multiple datasets, the authors demonstrate that the SPN approach outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods for composed image retrieval. This suggests that the scaling of positive and negative samples can be an effective way to learn more meaningful representations for this task.

The insights from this work could have broader implications for other computer vision problems involving complex relationships between visual elements, such as scene understanding or object detection. Future research could explore the interpretability of the learned representations and the computational efficiency of the SPN approach in real-world applications.