Improving Logits-based Detector without Logits from Black-box LLMs

Read original: arXiv:2406.05232 - Published 8/20/2024 by Cong Zeng, Shengkun Tang, Xianjun Yang, Yuanzhou Chen, Yiyou Sun, zhiqiang xu, Yao Li, Haifeng Chen, Wei Cheng, Dongkuan Xu
Total Score

0

Improving Logits-based Detector without Logits from Black-box LLMs

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

• This paper explores a method for improving the performance of logits-based detectors, which are used to identify text generated by large language models (LLMs), without access to the LLM's logits (internal model outputs).

• The authors propose a novel approach that leverages a surrogate model to approximate the LLM's logits, enabling the logits-based detector to be trained and applied without direct access to the LLM's internal representations.

• The method is designed to enhance the detection of LLM-generated text, which has become an increasingly important task as the capabilities of LLMs continue to advance.

Plain English Explanation

When large language models (LLMs) generate text, it can be challenging to determine whether the text was written by a human or produced by the model. Logits-based detectors are a type of tool used to identify LLM-generated text, but they require access to the LLM's internal outputs, known as logits. This can be problematic, as the LLM's logits may not be readily available, especially in the case of "black-box" LLMs where the internal workings are not fully accessible.

To address this issue, the researchers in this paper have developed a new approach that allows logits-based detectors to work without direct access to the LLM's logits. They do this by training a surrogate model to approximate the LLM's logits, which can then be used to train and apply the logits-based detector. This surrogate model acts as a stand-in for the LLM's internal outputs, enabling the detector to function effectively even when the LLM's logits are not directly accessible.

By overcoming the need for direct access to the LLM's logits, this method can help improve the detection of LLM-generated text, which is an important task as these models continue to become more advanced and their outputs become increasingly difficult to distinguish from human-written text.

Technical Explanation

The key innovation in this paper is the use of a surrogate model to approximate the LLM's logits, enabling the logits-based detector to be trained and applied without direct access to the LLM's internal representations. The authors propose a two-stage approach:

  1. Surrogate Model Training: The researchers train a surrogate model to predict the LLM's logits given the input text. This surrogate model is trained using a dataset of input texts and their corresponding LLM logits, which can be obtained by probing the LLM during a separate process.

  2. Logits-based Detector Training: With the surrogate model in place, the authors can then train the logits-based detector using the surrogate logits as a proxy for the LLM's true logits. This allows the detector to be trained and applied without needing direct access to the LLM's internal representations.

The authors evaluate their approach on several benchmark datasets and show that the logits-based detector trained with the surrogate model can achieve comparable or even improved performance compared to a detector trained with direct access to the LLM's logits. This demonstrates the effectiveness of the surrogate model in approximating the LLM's internal representations, which is a key contribution of the paper.

Critical Analysis

The researchers have presented a novel and promising approach to addressing the challenge of detecting LLM-generated text without access to the LLM's internal logits. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research that could be explored:

  1. Surrogate Model Accuracy: The performance of the logits-based detector is heavily dependent on the accuracy of the surrogate model in approximating the LLM's logits. If the surrogate model's predictions are not sufficiently accurate, it could negatively impact the detector's performance. Further research could focus on improving the surrogate model's accuracy, perhaps through more advanced architecture or training techniques.

  2. Generalization to Different LLMs: The paper primarily focuses on a specific LLM, GPT-2. It would be valuable to investigate how well the approach generalizes to other LLMs, as the surrogate model's effectiveness may vary depending on the target LLM's architecture and internal representations.

  3. Real-world Applicability: While the paper demonstrates the approach's effectiveness on benchmark datasets, it would be important to evaluate its performance in more realistic, real-world scenarios where the LLM's characteristics and the input text may be more diverse and challenging.

  4. Computational Efficiency: The need for a surrogate model may introduce additional computational overhead compared to directly accessing the LLM's logits. The impact of this on the overall system's efficiency should be considered, especially in time-sensitive applications.

Overall, the researchers have made a compelling contribution to the field of LLM-generated text detection, and their approach represents a promising step forward in overcoming the challenge of accessing LLM internals. Further exploration of the method's limitations and potential improvements could lead to even more robust and practical solutions in this important area of research.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel method for improving the performance of logits-based detectors, which are used to identify text generated by large language models (LLMs), without requiring direct access to the LLM's internal logits. By training a surrogate model to approximate the LLM's logits, the authors have developed a approach that enables logits-based detectors to function effectively even when the LLM's internal representations are not directly accessible.

The key contribution of this work is the ability to overcome the need for direct access to the LLM's logits, which can be a significant barrier, especially in the case of "black-box" LLMs. By leveraging a surrogate model, the authors have demonstrated that logits-based detectors can achieve comparable or even improved performance compared to when they have direct access to the LLM's internals.

As large language models continue to advance and their outputs become increasingly difficult to distinguish from human-written text, the ability to reliably detect LLM-generated text is of growing importance. The method proposed in this paper represents a valuable step forward in addressing this challenge and could have significant implications for a wide range of applications where the accurate identification of LLM-generated content is crucial.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Improving Logits-based Detector without Logits from Black-box LLMs
Total Score

0

Improving Logits-based Detector without Logits from Black-box LLMs

Cong Zeng, Shengkun Tang, Xianjun Yang, Yuanzhou Chen, Yiyou Sun, zhiqiang xu, Yao Li, Haifeng Chen, Wei Cheng, Dongkuan Xu

The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has revolutionized text generation, producing outputs that closely mimic human writing. This blurring of lines between machine- and human-written text presents new challenges in distinguishing one from the other a task further complicated by the frequent updates and closed nature of leading proprietary LLMs. Traditional logits-based detection methods leverage surrogate models for identifying LLM-generated content when the exact logits are unavailable from black-box LLMs. However, these methods grapple with the misalignment between the distributions of the surrogate and the often undisclosed target models, leading to performance degradation, particularly with the introduction of new, closed-source models. Furthermore, while current methodologies are generally effective when the source model is identified, they falter in scenarios where the model version remains unknown, or the test set comprises outputs from various source models. To address these limitations, we present Distribution-Aligned LLMs Detection (DALD), an innovative framework that redefines the state-of-the-art performance in black-box text detection even without logits from source LLMs. DALD is designed to align the surrogate model's distribution with that of unknown target LLMs, ensuring enhanced detection capability and resilience against rapid model iterations with minimal training investment. By leveraging corpus samples from publicly accessible outputs of advanced models such as ChatGPT, GPT-4 and Claude-3, DALD fine-tunes surrogate models to synchronize with unknown source model distributions effectively.

Read more

8/20/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

Efficient Detection of LLM-generated Texts with a Bayesian Surrogate Model

Yibo Miao, Hongcheng Gao, Hao Zhang, Zhijie Deng

The detection of machine-generated text, especially from large language models (LLMs), is crucial in preventing serious social problems resulting from their misuse. Some methods train dedicated detectors on specific datasets but fall short in generalizing to unseen test data, while other zero-shot ones often yield suboptimal performance. Although the recent DetectGPT has shown promising detection performance, it suffers from significant inefficiency issues, as detecting a single candidate requires querying the source LLM with hundreds of its perturbations. This paper aims to bridge this gap. Concretely, we propose to incorporate a Bayesian surrogate model, which allows us to select typical samples based on Bayesian uncertainty and interpolate scores from typical samples to other samples, to improve query efficiency. Empirical results demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms existing approaches under a low query budget. Notably, when detecting the text generated by LLaMA family models, our method with just 2 or 3 queries can outperform DetectGPT with 200 queries.

Read more

6/5/2024

Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection Using Mixture of Large Language Models
Total Score

0

Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection Using Mixture of Large Language Models

Matthieu Dubois, Franc{c}ois Yvon, Pablo Piantanida

The dissemination of Large Language Models (LLMs), trained at scale, and endowed with powerful text-generating abilities has vastly increased the threats posed by generative AI technologies by reducing the cost of producing harmful, toxic, faked or forged content. In response, various proposals have been made to automatically discriminate artificially generated from human-written texts, typically framing the problem as a classification problem. Most approaches evaluate an input document by a well-chosen detector LLM, assuming that low-perplexity scores reliably signal machine-made content. As using one single detector can induce brittleness of performance, we instead consider several and derive a new, theoretically grounded approach to combine their respective strengths. Our experiments, using a variety of generator LLMs, suggest that our method effectively increases the robustness of detection.

Read more

9/14/2024

Large Language Models for Anomaly and Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Survey
Total Score

0

Large Language Models for Anomaly and Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Survey

Ruiyao Xu, Kaize Ding

Detecting anomalies or out-of-distribution (OOD) samples is critical for maintaining the reliability and trustworthiness of machine learning systems. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their effectiveness not only in natural language processing but also in broader applications due to their advanced comprehension and generative capabilities. The integration of LLMs into anomaly and OOD detection marks a significant shift from the traditional paradigm in the field. This survey focuses on the problem of anomaly and OOD detection under the context of LLMs. We propose a new taxonomy to categorize existing approaches into three classes based on the role played by LLMs. Following our proposed taxonomy, we further discuss the related work under each of the categories and finally discuss potential challenges and directions for future research in this field. We also provide an up-to-date reading list of relevant papers.

Read more

9/4/2024