Efficient Detection of LLM-generated Texts with a Bayesian Surrogate Model
2305.16617
0
0
🔎
Abstract
The detection of machine-generated text, especially from large language models (LLMs), is crucial in preventing serious social problems resulting from their misuse. Some methods train dedicated detectors on specific datasets but fall short in generalizing to unseen test data, while other zero-shot ones often yield suboptimal performance. Although the recent DetectGPT has shown promising detection performance, it suffers from significant inefficiency issues, as detecting a single candidate requires querying the source LLM with hundreds of its perturbations. This paper aims to bridge this gap. Concretely, we propose to incorporate a Bayesian surrogate model, which allows us to select typical samples based on Bayesian uncertainty and interpolate scores from typical samples to other samples, to improve query efficiency. Empirical results demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms existing approaches under a low query budget. Notably, when detecting the text generated by LLaMA family models, our method with just 2 or 3 queries can outperform DetectGPT with 200 queries.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper focuses on the detection of machine-generated text, which is crucial to prevent misuse of large language models (LLMs).
- Existing methods either struggle to generalize to unseen data or are inefficient, requiring many queries to the source LLM.
- The paper proposes a new approach that uses a Bayesian surrogate model to improve query efficiency and outperform existing methods.
Plain English Explanation
The paper is about detecting when text has been generated by a machine, such as a large language model (LLM), rather than written by a human. This is an important problem because LLMs can be misused to generate fake content, which can lead to serious social problems.
Some existing methods try to train specialized detectors on specific datasets, but these don't work well on new, unseen data. Other methods that don't require training on a dataset often don't perform as well as they could. A recent method called DetectGPT showed promising detection performance, but it has a significant efficiency problem – to detect if a single piece of text was machine-generated, it needs to make hundreds of queries to the LLM that generated the text.
The new approach proposed in this paper tries to solve this efficiency problem. It uses a special type of model called a Bayesian surrogate model to select a few "typical" samples and then use those to estimate whether other samples were machine-generated. This allows it to make far fewer queries to the LLM than DetectGPT, while still maintaining good detection performance. In fact, the paper shows that their method can outperform DetectGPT while only making 2-3 queries, compared to DetectGPT's 200 queries.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a new method for detecting machine-generated text from LLMs that improves upon the efficiency issues of existing approaches like DetectGPT.
The key innovation is the use of a Bayesian surrogate model, which allows the system to:
- Select a small number of "typical" samples from the candidate text based on Bayesian uncertainty.
- Query the source LLM on just these typical samples.
- Interpolate the detection scores from the typical samples to estimate scores for the other samples, without querying the LLM on them.
This approach significantly reduces the number of queries needed compared to DetectGPT, while still maintaining strong detection performance. The paper demonstrates that their method can outperform DetectGPT when detecting text from the LLaMA family of models, using just 2-3 queries compared to DetectGPT's 200 queries.
The paper also includes comprehensive experiments comparing their approach to a range of other baselines on multiple datasets, including MAGE and GPT-2 output. The results show the consistent advantages of their Bayesian surrogate model approach in terms of both query efficiency and detection performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and thoughtful solution to the important problem of detecting machine-generated text from LLMs. The use of a Bayesian surrogate model is a clever and effective way to improve query efficiency while maintaining strong detection performance.
One potential limitation is that the method still requires some queries to the source LLM, which may not be feasible in all real-world scenarios. Additionally, the paper only evaluates the approach on text generated by a few specific LLM families (GPT-2, LLaMA). It would be valuable to see how well it generalizes to a wider range of LLM architectures and text generation scenarios.
The authors also acknowledge that their method may be vulnerable to advanced adversarial attacks that could fool the Bayesian surrogate model. Further research into the robustness of this approach against such attacks would be a valuable contribution.
Overall, this paper presents a compelling and practical solution to an important problem. The use of the Bayesian surrogate model is a creative and effective approach that could have broader applications beyond just machine-generated text detection.
Conclusion
This paper tackles the crucial problem of detecting machine-generated text, especially from large language models (LLMs), which is essential to prevent the misuse of these powerful AI systems. The authors propose a new method that uses a Bayesian surrogate model to significantly improve the efficiency of detection, while still maintaining strong performance.
By requiring far fewer queries to the source LLM compared to previous approaches, this method represents an important step forward in making machine-generated text detection more practical and accessible. The strong empirical results, particularly on detecting text from the LLaMA family of models, suggest that this approach could have a significant real-world impact in combating the spread of fake, machine-generated content online.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🎲
A Survey on LLM-Generated Text Detection: Necessity, Methods, and Future Directions
Junchao Wu, Shu Yang, Runzhe Zhan, Yulin Yuan, Derek F. Wong, Lidia S. Chao
0
0
The powerful ability to understand, follow, and generate complex language emerging from large language models (LLMs) makes LLM-generated text flood many areas of our daily lives at an incredible speed and is widely accepted by humans. As LLMs continue to expand, there is an imperative need to develop detectors that can detect LLM-generated text. This is crucial to mitigate potential misuse of LLMs and safeguard realms like artistic expression and social networks from harmful influence of LLM-generated content. The LLM-generated text detection aims to discern if a piece of text was produced by an LLM, which is essentially a binary classification task. The detector techniques have witnessed notable advancements recently, propelled by innovations in watermarking techniques, statistics-based detectors, neural-base detectors, and human-assisted methods. In this survey, we collate recent research breakthroughs in this area and underscore the pressing need to bolster detector research. We also delve into prevalent datasets, elucidating their limitations and developmental requirements. Furthermore, we analyze various LLM-generated text detection paradigms, shedding light on challenges like out-of-distribution problems, potential attacks, real-world data issues and the lack of effective evaluation framework. Conclusively, we highlight interesting directions for future research in LLM-generated text detection to advance the implementation of responsible artificial intelligence (AI). Our aim with this survey is to provide a clear and comprehensive introduction for newcomers while also offering seasoned researchers a valuable update in the field of LLM-generated text detection. The useful resources are publicly available at: https://github.com/NLP2CT/LLM-generated-Text-Detection.
4/22/2024
🔎
Deepfake Text Detection in the Wild
Yafu Li, Qintong Li, Leyang Cui, Wei Bi, Zhilin Wang, Longyue Wang, Linyi Yang, Shuming Shi, Yue Zhang
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved human-level text generation, emphasizing the need for effective AI-generated text detection to mitigate risks like the spread of fake news and plagiarism. Existing research has been constrained by evaluating detection methods on specific domains or particular language models. In practical scenarios, however, the detector faces texts from various domains or LLMs without knowing their sources. To this end, we build a comprehensive testbed by gathering texts from diverse human writings and texts generated by different LLMs. Empirical results show challenges in distinguishing machine-generated texts from human-authored ones across various scenarios, especially out-of-distribution. These challenges are due to the decreasing linguistic distinctions between the two sources. Despite challenges, the top-performing detector can identify 86.54% out-of-domain texts generated by a new LLM, indicating the feasibility for application scenarios. We release our resources at https://github.com/yafuly/MAGE.
5/22/2024
🔎
Applying Ensemble Methods to Model-Agnostic Machine-Generated Text Detection
Ivan Ong, Boon King Quek
0
0
In this paper, we study the problem of detecting machine-generated text when the large language model (LLM) it is possibly derived from is unknown. We do so by apply ensembling methods to the outputs from DetectGPT classifiers (Mitchell et al. 2023), a zero-shot model for machine-generated text detection which is highly accurate when the generative (or base) language model is the same as the discriminative (or scoring) language model. We find that simple summary statistics of DetectGPT sub-model outputs yield an AUROC of 0.73 (relative to 0.61) while retaining its zero-shot nature, and that supervised learning methods sharply boost the accuracy to an AUROC of 0.94 but require a training dataset. This suggests the possibility of further generalisation to create a highly-accurate, model-agnostic machine-generated text detector.
6/19/2024
Few-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text using Style Representations
Rafael Rivera Soto, Kailin Koch, Aleem Khan, Barry Chen, Marcus Bishop, Nicholas Andrews
0
0
The advent of instruction-tuned language models that convincingly mimic human writing poses a significant risk of abuse. However, such abuse may be counteracted with the ability to detect whether a piece of text was composed by a language model rather than a human author. Some previous approaches to this problem have relied on supervised methods by training on corpora of confirmed human- and machine- written documents. Unfortunately, model under-specification poses an unavoidable challenge for neural network-based detectors, making them brittle in the face of data shifts, such as the release of newer language models producing still more fluent text than the models used to train the detectors. Other approaches require access to the models that may have generated a document in question, which is often impractical. In light of these challenges, we pursue a fundamentally different approach not relying on samples from language models of concern at training time. Instead, we propose to leverage representations of writing style estimated from human-authored text. Indeed, we find that features effective at distinguishing among human authors are also effective at distinguishing human from machine authors, including state-of-the-art large language models like Llama-2, ChatGPT, and GPT-4. Furthermore, given a handful of examples composed by each of several specific language models of interest, our approach affords the ability to predict which model generated a given document. The code and data to reproduce our experiments are available at https://github.com/LLNL/LUAR/tree/main/fewshot_iclr2024.
5/9/2024