Improving Multi-Agent Debate with Sparse Communication Topology
2406.11776
0
0
Abstract
Multi-agent debate has proven effective in improving large language models quality for reasoning and factuality tasks. While various role-playing strategies in multi-agent debates have been explored, in terms of the communication among agents, existing approaches adopt a brute force algorithm -- each agent can communicate with all other agents. In this paper, we systematically investigate the effect of communication connectivity in multi-agent systems. Our experiments on GPT and Mistral models reveal that multi-agent debates leveraging sparse communication topology can achieve comparable or superior performance while significantly reducing computational costs. Furthermore, we extend the multi-agent debate framework to multimodal reasoning and alignment labeling tasks, showcasing its broad applicability and effectiveness. Our findings underscore the importance of communication connectivity on enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of the society of minds approach.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores how to improve multi-agent debate systems using a sparse communication topology.
- The key idea is to restrict the communication channels between agents, forcing them to be more selective and efficient in how they exchange information.
- This approach is hypothesized to lead to better performance in multi-agent debate tasks compared to fully-connected communication topologies.
Plain English Explanation
Multi-agent debate systems are a type of artificial intelligence where multiple intelligent agents engage in a debate, each advocating for a different position or viewpoint. These systems can be useful for tasks like evaluating arguments, testing hypotheses, or exploring complex issues from multiple perspectives.
However, in traditional multi-agent debate setups, the agents can freely communicate with each other, which can lead to inefficient or redundant information exchange. This paper proposes a more efficient direct-connect topology where the communication channels between agents are limited, forcing them to be more selective and strategic in how they share information.
The key idea is that by restricting the communication topology, the agents will need to focus on the most relevant and impactful information to convey, rather than simply passing along everything they know. This could lead to better performance on multi-agent debate tasks, as the agents will be able to more effectively coordinate their arguments and responses.
Technical Explanation
The researchers designed an experiment to test the performance of multi-agent debate systems using a sparse communication topology compared to a fully-connected topology. They created a simulated debate environment with multiple agents, each representing a different perspective or argument.
In the sparse communication condition, the agents were only allowed to communicate with a subset of the other agents, rather than being able to communicate freely with everyone. The researchers hypothesized that this would force the agents to be more selective and efficient in their information sharing, leading to better overall debate performance.
To evaluate the impact of the communication topology, the researchers measured various metrics, such as the quality of the final debate outcome, the efficiency of the information exchange, and the individual agent's performance. They found that the sparse communication topology did indeed lead to better debate performance, as the agents were able to more effectively coordinate their arguments and avoid redundant or irrelevant information sharing.
The researchers also explored the impact of different levels of sparsity, finding that there was an optimal level of communication restriction that balanced the need for selective information exchange with the need for sufficient coordination and information sharing.
Critical Analysis
The research presented in this paper offers a promising approach to improving the performance of multi-agent debate systems. By restricting the communication topology, the agents are forced to be more strategic and efficient in how they exchange information, which can lead to better overall debate outcomes.
However, it's important to note that the researchers' findings are based on a simulated debate environment, and it's unclear how well the results would translate to real-world multi-agent debate scenarios. There may be additional complexities or constraints in real-world settings that could impact the effectiveness of the sparse communication approach.
Additionally, the researchers only explored a limited range of communication topologies and sparsity levels. It's possible that other types of communication restrictions or network structures could lead to even better performance, and further research would be needed to explore the full design space.
Finally, the paper does not address potential issues related to communication-efficient large-scale distributed deep learning or the multi-user semantic communication in the context of multi-agent debate systems. These are important considerations that could impact the scalability and practical applicability of the proposed approach.
Conclusion
This research paper presents a novel approach to improving the performance of multi-agent debate systems by restricting the communication topology between agents. The key idea is that forcing the agents to be more selective and efficient in their information sharing can lead to better overall debate outcomes.
The experimental results suggest that this sparse communication approach does indeed offer performance benefits compared to a fully-connected topology. However, further research is needed to understand the limitations and potential extensions of this approach, as well as its applicability to real-world multi-agent debate scenarios.
Overall, this paper offers a valuable contribution to the field of multi-agent communication and coordination, and the insights gained could inform the development of more robust and effective multi-agent debate systems in the future.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Problem-Solving in Language Model Networks
Ciaran Regan, Alexandre Gournail, Mizuki Oka
0
0
To improve the reasoning and question-answering capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), several multi-agent approaches have been introduced. While these methods enhance performance, the application of collective intelligence-based approaches to complex network structures and the dynamics of agent interactions remain underexplored. This work extends the concept of multi-agent debate to more general network topologies, measuring the question-answering accuracy, influence, consensus, and the effects of bias on the collective. The results show that random networks perform similarly to fully connected networks despite using significantly fewer tokens. Furthermore, a strong consensus among agents in correlates with correct answers, whereas divided responses typically indicate incorrect answers. Analysing the influence of the agents reveals a balance between self-reflection and interconnectedness; self-reflection aids when local interactions are incorrect, and local interactions aid when the agent itself is incorrect. Additionally, bias plays a strong role in system performance with correctly biased hub nodes boosting performance. These insights suggest that using random networks or scale-free networks with knowledgeable agents placed in central positions can enhance the overall performance of multi-agent systems.
6/19/2024
📈
Learning Multi-Agent Communication from Graph Modeling Perspective
Shengchao Hu, Li Shen, Ya Zhang, Dacheng Tao
0
0
In numerous artificial intelligence applications, the collaborative efforts of multiple intelligent agents are imperative for the successful attainment of target objectives. To enhance coordination among these agents, a distributed communication framework is often employed. However, information sharing among all agents proves to be resource-intensive, while the adoption of a manually pre-defined communication architecture imposes limitations on inter-agent communication, thereby constraining the potential for collaborative efforts. In this study, we introduce a novel approach wherein we conceptualize the communication architecture among agents as a learnable graph. We formulate this problem as the task of determining the communication graph while enabling the architecture parameters to update normally, thus necessitating a bi-level optimization process. Utilizing continuous relaxation of the graph representation and incorporating attention units, our proposed approach, CommFormer, efficiently optimizes the communication graph and concurrently refines architectural parameters through gradient descent in an end-to-end manner. Extensive experiments on a variety of cooperative tasks substantiate the robustness of our model across diverse cooperative scenarios, where agents are able to develop more coordinated and sophisticated strategies regardless of changes in the number of agents.
5/15/2024
MultiAgent Collaboration Attack: Investigating Adversarial Attacks in Large Language Model Collaborations via Debate
Alfonso Amayuelas, Xianjun Yang, Antonis Antoniades, Wenyue Hua, Liangming Pan, William Wang
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown exceptional results on current benchmarks when working individually. The advancement in their capabilities, along with a reduction in parameter size and inference times, has facilitated the use of these models as agents, enabling interactions among multiple models to execute complex tasks. Such collaborations offer several advantages, including the use of specialized models (e.g. coding), improved confidence through multiple computations, and enhanced divergent thinking, leading to more diverse outputs. Thus, the collaborative use of language models is expected to grow significantly in the coming years. In this work, we evaluate the behavior of a network of models collaborating through debate under the influence of an adversary. We introduce pertinent metrics to assess the adversary's effectiveness, focusing on system accuracy and model agreement. Our findings highlight the importance of a model's persuasive ability in influencing others. Additionally, we explore inference-time methods to generate more compelling arguments and evaluate the potential of prompt-based mitigation as a defensive strategy.
6/27/2024
💬
Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate
Tian Liang, Zhiwei He, Wenxiang Jiao, Xing Wang, Yan Wang, Rui Wang, Yujiu Yang, Zhaopeng Tu, Shuming Shi
0
0
Modern large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT have shown remarkable performance on general language tasks but still struggle on complex reasoning tasks, which drives the research on cognitive behaviors of LLMs to explore human-like problem-solving strategies. Along this direction, one representative strategy is self-reflection, which asks an LLM to refine the solution with the feedback generated by itself iteratively. However, our study shows that such reflection-style methods suffer from the Degeneration-of-Thought (DoT) problem: once the LLM has established confidence in its solutions, it is unable to generate novel thoughts later through reflection even if its initial stance is incorrect. To address the DoT problem, we propose a Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) framework, in which multiple agents express their arguments in the state of tit for tat and a judge manages the debate process to obtain a final solution. Clearly, our MAD framework encourages divergent thinking in LLMs which would be helpful for tasks that require deep levels of contemplation. Experiment results on two challenging datasets, commonsense machine translation and counter-intuitive arithmetic reasoning, demonstrate the effectiveness of our MAD framework. Extensive analyses suggest that the adaptive break of debate and the modest level of tit for tat state are required for MAD to obtain good performance. Moreover, we find that LLMs might not be a fair judge if different LLMs are used for agents. Code is available at https://github.com/Skytliang/Multi-Agents-Debate.
6/21/2024