Problem-Solving in Language Model Networks
2406.12374
0
0
Abstract
To improve the reasoning and question-answering capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), several multi-agent approaches have been introduced. While these methods enhance performance, the application of collective intelligence-based approaches to complex network structures and the dynamics of agent interactions remain underexplored. This work extends the concept of multi-agent debate to more general network topologies, measuring the question-answering accuracy, influence, consensus, and the effects of bias on the collective. The results show that random networks perform similarly to fully connected networks despite using significantly fewer tokens. Furthermore, a strong consensus among agents in correlates with correct answers, whereas divided responses typically indicate incorrect answers. Analysing the influence of the agents reveals a balance between self-reflection and interconnectedness; self-reflection aids when local interactions are incorrect, and local interactions aid when the agent itself is incorrect. Additionally, bias plays a strong role in system performance with correctly biased hub nodes boosting performance. These insights suggest that using random networks or scale-free networks with knowledgeable agents placed in central positions can enhance the overall performance of multi-agent systems.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines how large language model (LLM) networks can be used to solve complex problems through collaborative problem-solving.
- The researchers explore different architectures and interaction dynamics for multi-agent systems composed of LLMs.
- Key ideas include scaling large language model based multi-agent systems, network formation dynamics among multiple LLMs, and organizing society of language models with enhanced structures and mechanisms.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how groups of large language models (LLMs) - computer programs that can understand and generate human-like text - can work together to solve complex problems. The researchers experiment with different ways of structuring these multi-agent systems, exploring how the LLMs interact and form networks to tackle challenges collaboratively.
For example, the paper discusses scaling up multi-agent systems built on LLMs and examines the dynamics of how these LLM agents form connections and exchange information. The goal is to understand how to organize a "society" of language models in ways that enhance their problem-solving abilities.
By having multiple LLMs work together, the researchers believe they can tackle more complex problems than a single LLM could handle on its own. The paper explores different approaches to facilitate this cooperative problem-solving.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the use of large language model (LLM) networks for collaborative problem-solving. The researchers experiment with different multi-agent system architectures and interaction dynamics to understand how these systems can be designed to effectively solve complex tasks.
Key technical elements explored in the paper include:
- Scaling up multi-agent systems built on LLMs to handle larger-scale problems
- Modeling the network formation dynamics among multiple LLMs as they interact and exchange information
- Organizing the "society" of language models with enhanced structures and mechanisms to facilitate more effective collaborative problem-solving
The researchers design experiments to test different architectural choices and interaction protocols, evaluating the performance of the multi-agent LLM systems on a variety of benchmark tasks. The insights gained from this research aim to inform the development of more sophisticated and capable collaborative problem-solving systems built on large language models.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents an interesting and innovative approach to leveraging the capabilities of large language models for collaborative problem-solving. However, the researchers acknowledge several limitations and areas for further exploration:
One key caveat is the computational and resource demands of scaling up these multi-agent LLM systems, which could limit their practical applicability, especially for resource-constrained settings. The paper does not fully address how these systems could be made more efficient and accessible.
Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on benchmark tasks and does not explore the potential societal implications or ethical considerations of deploying such systems at scale, such as enhancing diagnostic accuracy through multi-agent conversations. Further research in this direction would be valuable.
Overall, the research presented in the paper represents an important step forward in understanding how large language models can be leveraged for collaborative problem-solving. However, additional work is needed to address the practical and ethical challenges that may arise as these systems become more advanced and widely adopted.
Conclusion
This paper explores the use of large language model (LLM) networks for collaborative problem-solving, experimenting with different multi-agent system architectures and interaction dynamics. The key ideas include scaling up multi-agent systems built on LLMs, modeling the network formation dynamics among multiple LLMs, and organizing the "society" of language models with enhanced structures and mechanisms to facilitate more effective collaborative problem-solving.
While the research presents promising results, the paper also acknowledges limitations, such as the computational demands of scaling these systems and the need to further explore the societal implications. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step forward in understanding how large language models can be leveraged for tackling complex, multi-faceted problems through collaborative approaches.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
MultiAgent Collaboration Attack: Investigating Adversarial Attacks in Large Language Model Collaborations via Debate
Alfonso Amayuelas, Xianjun Yang, Antonis Antoniades, Wenyue Hua, Liangming Pan, William Wang
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown exceptional results on current benchmarks when working individually. The advancement in their capabilities, along with a reduction in parameter size and inference times, has facilitated the use of these models as agents, enabling interactions among multiple models to execute complex tasks. Such collaborations offer several advantages, including the use of specialized models (e.g. coding), improved confidence through multiple computations, and enhanced divergent thinking, leading to more diverse outputs. Thus, the collaborative use of language models is expected to grow significantly in the coming years. In this work, we evaluate the behavior of a network of models collaborating through debate under the influence of an adversary. We introduce pertinent metrics to assess the adversary's effectiveness, focusing on system accuracy and model agreement. Our findings highlight the importance of a model's persuasive ability in influencing others. Additionally, we explore inference-time methods to generate more compelling arguments and evaluate the potential of prompt-based mitigation as a defensive strategy.
6/27/2024
Scaling Large-Language-Model-based Multi-Agent Collaboration
Chen Qian, Zihao Xie, Yifei Wang, Wei Liu, Yufan Dang, Zhuoyun Du, Weize Chen, Cheng Yang, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun
0
0
Pioneering advancements in large language model-powered agents have underscored the design pattern of multi-agent collaboration, demonstrating that collective intelligence can surpass the capabilities of each individual. Inspired by the neural scaling law, which posits that increasing neurons leads to emergent abilities, this study investigates whether a similar principle applies to increasing agents in multi-agent collaboration. Technically, we propose multi-agent collaboration networks (MacNet), which utilize directed acyclic graphs to organize agents and streamline their interactive reasoning via topological ordering, with solutions derived from their dialogues. Extensive experiments show that MacNet consistently outperforms baseline models, enabling effective agent collaboration across various network topologies and supporting cooperation among more than a thousand agents. Notably, we observed a small-world collaboration phenomenon, where topologies resembling small-world properties achieved superior performance. Additionally, we identified a collaborative scaling law, indicating that normalized solution quality follows a logistic growth pattern as scaling agents, with collaborative emergence occurring much earlier than previously observed instances of neural emergence. The code and data will be available at https://github.com/OpenBMB/ChatDev.
6/12/2024
🌐
Network Formation and Dynamics Among Multi-LLMs
Marios Papachristou, Yuan Yuan
0
0
Social networks shape opinions, behaviors, and information dissemination in human societies. As large language models (LLMs) increasingly integrate into social and professional environments, understanding their behavior within the context of social interactions and networks becomes essential. Our study analyzes LLMs' network formation behavior to examine whether the dynamics of multiple LLMs are similar to or different from human social dynamics. We observe that LLMs exhibit key social network principles, including preferential attachment, triadic closure, homophily, community structure, and the small-world phenomenon, when asked about their preferences in network formation. We also investigate LLMs' decision-making based on real-world networks, revealing that triadic closure and homophily have a stronger influence than preferential attachment and that LLMs perform well in network formation predictions. Overall, our study opens up new possibilities for using LLMs in network science research and helps develop socially aware LLMs by shedding light on their social interaction behaviors and exploring their impacts on social dynamics.
6/4/2024
Improving Multi-Agent Debate with Sparse Communication Topology
Yunxuan Li, Yibing Du, Jiageng Zhang, Le Hou, Peter Grabowski, Yeqing Li, Eugene Ie
0
0
Multi-agent debate has proven effective in improving large language models quality for reasoning and factuality tasks. While various role-playing strategies in multi-agent debates have been explored, in terms of the communication among agents, existing approaches adopt a brute force algorithm -- each agent can communicate with all other agents. In this paper, we systematically investigate the effect of communication connectivity in multi-agent systems. Our experiments on GPT and Mistral models reveal that multi-agent debates leveraging sparse communication topology can achieve comparable or superior performance while significantly reducing computational costs. Furthermore, we extend the multi-agent debate framework to multimodal reasoning and alignment labeling tasks, showcasing its broad applicability and effectiveness. Our findings underscore the importance of communication connectivity on enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of the society of minds approach.
6/18/2024