Improving Ontology Requirements Engineering with OntoChat and Participatory Prompting
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper proposes a framework called "OntoChat" that combines conversational AI and participatory prompting to improve ontology requirements engineering.
- OntoChat aims to engage domain experts in the ontology development process through interactive dialogues, allowing them to provide input and feedback more effectively.
- The framework incorporates large language models to enable natural language interactions and prompt-based knowledge capture.
Plain English Explanation
The research paper introduces a new approach called "OntoChat" that combines conversational AI and participatory prompting to enhance the process of developing ontologies. Ontologies are formal representations of knowledge domains that are crucial for various applications, such as data integration, knowledge management, and artificial intelligence.
[Ontologies: Formal representations of knowledge domains that are used in various applications]
Traditionally, ontology development has relied on domain experts providing requirements and specifications, which can be a challenging and time-consuming process. The OntoChat framework aims to make this process more engaging and interactive by allowing domain experts to participate in conversational dialogues with an AI system.
[Participatory prompting: Allowing domain experts to provide input and feedback through interactive dialogues with an AI system]
Through these dialogues, the domain experts can share their knowledge and requirements more naturally, and the AI system can use large language models to better understand and capture this information. This approach is designed to improve the overall quality and relevance of the ontology being developed, as it directly incorporates the expertise and perspectives of the end-users.
[Large language models: AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text, enabling more natural conversations]
The paper presents the technical details of the OntoChat framework and demonstrates its potential through various use cases and evaluation metrics. The researchers believe that this approach can help bridge the gap between domain experts and ontology engineers, leading to more effective ontology development and better alignment with user needs.
Technical Explanation
The core of the OntoChat framework is the integration of conversational AI and participatory prompting. The system uses large language models, such as GPT-3, to engage in natural language dialogues with domain experts. These dialogues are structured around a series of prompts that guide the experts to provide information about the ontology requirements, including concepts, relationships, and constraints.
[Prompts: Carefully designed questions or statements that elicit specific information from domain experts]
The participatory prompting approach allows the domain experts to actively contribute to the ontology development process, rather than just providing static requirements. The AI system can ask clarifying questions, seek additional details, and validate the experts' input in real-time, leading to a more collaborative and iterative process.
[Participatory prompting: Allowing domain experts to actively contribute to the ontology development process through interactive dialogues]
The information gathered through the OntoChat dialogues is then used to inform the ontology engineering tasks, such as conceptual modeling, taxonomy building, and axiom formulation. The researchers have developed various techniques to automatically extract and structure the knowledge captured during the conversations, streamlining the ontology development workflow.
[Ontology engineering tasks: The various steps involved in creating a formal ontology, such as conceptual modeling and axiom formulation]
The paper presents several use cases and evaluation metrics to demonstrate the effectiveness of the OntoChat framework. These include comparing the ontologies developed with and without the participatory prompting approach, as well as gathering feedback from domain experts on the usability and relevance of the resulting ontologies.
Critical Analysis
The OntoChat framework represents a promising approach to improving ontology requirements engineering, as it addresses several key challenges in this domain. By leveraging conversational AI and participatory prompting, the system aims to bridge the gap between domain experts and ontology engineers, leading to ontologies that are more closely aligned with user needs.
However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations and areas for further research. For example, the effectiveness of the framework may depend on the quality and capabilities of the underlying large language models, which can vary across different domains and applications. Additionally, the paper suggests that further work is needed to enhance the interpretability and transparency of the knowledge capture process, as well as to address potential biases or errors that may arise from the conversational interactions.
[Limitations: Dependence on language model quality, need for improved interpretability and transparency, potential for biases or errors]
It would also be valuable to explore the long-term impact of the OntoChat approach on ontology maintenance and evolution, as the participatory nature of the framework may introduce additional complexities in managing changes and updates to the ontology over time.
[Further research: Exploring the long-term impact on ontology maintenance and evolution]
Overall, the OntoChat framework represents an innovative step towards making ontology development more accessible and responsive to the needs of domain experts. As the field of conversational AI continues to advance, this type of participatory approach may become increasingly valuable in a wide range of knowledge-intensive applications.
Conclusion
The research paper presents the OntoChat framework, which combines conversational AI and participatory prompting to improve the ontology requirements engineering process. By engaging domain experts in interactive dialogues, the system aims to capture their knowledge and requirements more effectively, leading to ontologies that are better aligned with user needs.
[Ontology requirements engineering: The process of gathering and defining the requirements for an ontology]
The key insights from the paper include the potential benefits of using large language models to enable more natural and collaborative ontology development, as well as the value of incorporating domain experts' perspectives and feedback throughout the process. While the paper acknowledges some limitations and areas for further research, the OntoChat framework represents a promising step towards making ontology engineering more accessible and responsive to user needs.
[Large language models: AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text, enabling more natural conversations] [Participatory approach: Involving domain experts in the ontology development process to capture their knowledge and requirements more effectively]
As the field of artificial intelligence continues to evolve, approaches like OntoChat may become increasingly important for developing robust and user-centric knowledge representations that can support a wide range of applications and industries.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Improving Ontology Requirements Engineering with OntoChat and Participatory Prompting
Yihang Zhao, Bohui Zhang, Xi Hu, Shuyin Ouyang, Jongmo Kim, Nitisha Jain, Jacopo de Berardinis, Albert Mero~no-Pe~nuela, Elena Simperl
Past ontology requirements engineering (ORE) has primarily relied on manual methods, such as interviews and collaborative forums, to gather user requirements from domain experts, especially in large projects. Current OntoChat offers a framework for ORE that utilises large language models (LLMs) to streamline the process through four key functions: user story creation, competency question (CQ) extraction, CQ filtration and analysis, and ontology testing support. In OntoChat, users are expected to prompt the chatbot to generate user stories. However, preliminary evaluations revealed that they struggle to do this effectively. To address this issue, we experimented with a research method called participatory prompting, which involves researcher-mediated interactions to help users without deep knowledge of LLMs use the chatbot more effectively. This participatory prompting user study produces pre-defined prompt templates based on user queries, focusing on creating and refining personas, goals, scenarios, sample data, and data resources for user stories. These refined user stories will subsequently be converted into CQs.
Read more8/30/2024
0
OntoChat: a Framework for Conversational Ontology Engineering using Language Models
Bohui Zhang, Valentina Anita Carriero, Katrin Schreiberhuber, Stefani Tsaneva, Luc'ia S'anchez Gonz'alez, Jongmo Kim, Jacopo de Berardinis
Ontology engineering (OE) in large projects poses a number of challenges arising from the heterogeneous backgrounds of the various stakeholders, domain experts, and their complex interactions with ontology designers. This multi-party interaction often creates systematic ambiguities and biases from the elicitation of ontology requirements, which directly affect the design, evaluation and may jeopardise the target reuse. Meanwhile, current OE methodologies strongly rely on manual activities (e.g., interviews, discussion pages). After collecting evidence on the most crucial OE activities, we introduce textbf{OntoChat}, a framework for conversational ontology engineering that supports requirement elicitation, analysis, and testing. By interacting with a conversational agent, users can steer the creation of user stories and the extraction of competency questions, while receiving computational support to analyse the overall requirements and test early versions of the resulting ontologies. We evaluate OntoChat by replicating the engineering of the Music Meta Ontology, and collecting preliminary metrics on the effectiveness of each component from users. We release all code at https://github.com/King-s-Knowledge-Graph-Lab/OntoChat.
Read more4/29/2024
0
New!What You Say = What You Want? Teaching Humans to Articulate Requirements for LLMs
Qianou Ma, Weirui Peng, Hua Shen, Kenneth Koedinger, Tongshuang Wu
Prompting ChatGPT to achieve complex goals (e.g., creating a customer support chatbot) often demands meticulous prompt engineering, including aspects like fluent writing and chain-of-thought techniques. While emerging prompt optimizers can automatically refine many of these aspects, we argue that clearly conveying customized requirements (e.g., how to handle diverse inputs) remains a human-centric challenge. In this work, we introduce Requirement-Oriented Prompt Engineering (ROPE), a paradigm that focuses human attention on generating clear, complete requirements during prompting. We implement ROPE through an assessment and training suite that provides deliberate practice with LLM-generated feedback. In a study with 30 novices, we show that requirement-focused training doubles novices' prompting performance, significantly outperforming conventional prompt engineering training and prompt optimization. We also demonstrate that high-quality LLM outputs are directly tied to the quality of input requirements. Our work paves the way for more effective task delegation in human-LLM collaborative prompting.
Read more9/16/2024
0
Chatbot-Based Ontology Interaction Using Large Language Models and Domain-Specific Standards
Jonathan Reif, Tom Jeleniewski, Milapji Singh Gill, Felix Gehlhoff, Alexander Fay
The following contribution introduces a concept that employs Large Language Models (LLMs) and a chatbot interface to enhance SPARQL query generation for ontologies, thereby facilitating intuitive access to formalized knowledge. Utilizing natural language inputs, the system converts user inquiries into accurate SPARQL queries that strictly query the factual content of the ontology, effectively preventing misinformation or fabrication by the LLM. To enhance the quality and precision of outcomes, additional textual information from established domain-specific standards is integrated into the ontology for precise descriptions of its concepts and relationships. An experimental study assesses the accuracy of generated SPARQL queries, revealing significant benefits of using LLMs for querying ontologies and highlighting areas for future research.
Read more8/6/2024