Improving Planning with Large Language Models: A Modular Agentic Architecture
1
š¬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Large language models (LLMs) excel at many tasks, but struggle with multi-step reasoning and planning.
- Cognitive neuroscience and reinforcement learning suggest key components for search and evaluation in multi-step decision making.
- The Modular Agentic Planner (MAP) is an architecture that uses these components, implemented as specialized LLM modules, to improve planning.
Plain English Explanation
<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/improving-planning-large-language-models-modular-agentic">Large language models</a> (LLMs) are AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. They have become incredibly capable at a wide variety of tasks, from answering questions to writing stories. However, these models often struggle when it comes to planning - the ability to break down a complex problem, consider multiple steps, and figure out the best course of action.
The reason for this is that planning requires a different set of cognitive skills than the language understanding and generation that LLMs excel at. Planning involves things like monitoring for conflicts, predicting future states, evaluating those states, breaking down tasks, and orchestrating the overall process.
To address this, the researchers propose the <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/improving-planning-large-language-models-modular-agentic">Modular Agentic Planner (MAP)</a>. MAP is an architecture that breaks planning down into these specialized modules, each implemented using its own LLM. By having these different "agents" work together, MAP is able to plan more effectively than a single LLM attempting to do it all.
The researchers test MAP on several challenging planning tasks, like navigating a graph, solving the Tower of Hanoi puzzle, and a task that requires multi-step reasoning. They find that MAP outperforms both standard LLM approaches and other planning-focused baselines. This suggests that a modular, multi-agent approach could be a promising way to improve planning capabilities in large language models.
Technical Explanation
<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/improving-planning-large-language-models-modular-agentic">Large language models (LLMs)</a> have shown impressive performance on a wide range of tasks, but they often struggle with multi-step reasoning and goal-directed planning. This is a significant limitation, as planning is a crucial cognitive skill for many real-world applications.
To address this, the researchers propose the <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/improving-planning-large-language-models-modular-agentic">Modular Agentic Planner (MAP)</a>, an architecture inspired by insights from cognitive neuroscience and reinforcement learning. MAP breaks down the planning process into specialized modules, including:
- Conflict monitoring: Identifying potential conflicts or obstacles in the plan.
- State prediction: Forecasting the future state of the system given a proposed action.
- State evaluation: Assessing the quality of a predicted future state.
- Task decomposition: Breaking down the overall planning problem into smaller, more manageable sub-tasks.
- Orchestration: Coordinating the interaction between the other modules to produce a cohesive plan.
Each of these modules is implemented using its own LLM, allowing them to work together in a modular and recurrent fashion to tackle complex planning problems. This contrasts with a single LLM trying to handle all of these planning components at once.
The researchers evaluate MAP on three challenging planning tasks - graph traversal, Tower of Hanoi, and the PlanBench benchmark - as well as a natural language processing task requiring multi-step reasoning (strategyQA). They find that MAP significantly outperforms both standard LLM methods (zero-shot prompting, in-context learning) and other competitive planning-focused baselines (chain-of-thought, multi-agent debate, and tree-of-thought).
Importantly, the researchers also demonstrate that MAP can be effectively combined with smaller and more cost-efficient LLMs, such as Llama3-70B, and that it displays superior transfer across tasks. These results suggest that a modular, multi-agent approach to planning with LLMs can be a promising avenue for improving their planning capabilities.
Critical Analysis
The <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/improving-planning-large-language-models-modular-agentic">Modular Agentic Planner (MAP)</a> proposed in this paper represents an interesting and innovative approach to enhancing the planning abilities of large language models. By breaking down the planning process into specialized modules, each implemented with its own LLM, the researchers have created a more structured and coordinated system for tackling complex planning problems.
One potential limitation of the study is the relatively narrow set of planning tasks evaluated. While the researchers do test MAP on a diverse set of challenges, including the graph traversal, Tower of Hanoi, and strategyQA tasks, it would be valuable to see how the architecture performs on an even wider range of planning and reasoning problems. Additionally, the paper does not provide detailed analyses of the individual module's contributions or the emergent dynamics of their interactions.
<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/lasp-surveying-state-art-large-language-model">Further research</a> could also explore ways to make the modular structure of MAP more transparent and interpretable, which could lead to better understanding of the planning process and potential improvements. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/llms-cant-plan-but-can-help-planning">Integrating MAP with other planning-focused approaches</a>, such as reinforcement learning or knowledge-based systems, could also be a fruitful direction for future work.
Overall, the <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/improving-planning-large-language-models-modular-agentic">Modular Agentic Planner</a> represents a promising step towards enhancing the planning capabilities of large language models, and the results presented in this paper suggest that a modular, multi-agent approach holds significant potential for further advancements in this area.
Conclusion
The <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/improving-planning-large-language-models-modular-agentic">Modular Agentic Planner (MAP)</a> proposed in this paper offers a novel approach to improving the planning abilities of large language models (LLMs). By breaking down the planning process into specialized modules, each implemented with its own LLM, MAP is able to outperform standard LLM methods and other planning-focused baselines on a range of challenging tasks.
The results of this research suggest that a modular, multi-agent approach could be a fruitful direction for enhancing the planning capabilities of LLMs. This has important implications for the development of more robust and versatile AI systems that can tackle complex, real-world problems requiring advanced reasoning and decision-making skills.
<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/language-models-are-robotic-planners-reframing-plans">Further advancements in this area</a>, such as improving the interpretability of the modular structure or integrating MAP with other planning-focused approaches, could lead to even more significant breakthroughs in the field of AI planning and decision-making. Overall, this research represents an important step towards the development of more capable and flexible language models that can better support a wide range of applications and use cases.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š¬
1
Improving Planning with Large Language Models: A Modular Agentic Architecture
Taylor Webb, Shanka Subhra Mondal, Ida Momennejad
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive performance on a wide variety of tasks, but they often struggle with tasks that require multi-step reasoning or goal-directed planning. Both cognitive neuroscience and reinforcement learning (RL) have proposed a number of interacting functional components that together implement search and evaluation in multi-step decision making. These components include conflict monitoring, state prediction, state evaluation, task decomposition, and orchestration. To improve planning with LLMs, we propose an agentic architecture, the Modular Agentic Planner (MAP), in which planning is accomplished via the recurrent interaction of the specialized modules mentioned above, each implemented using an LLM. MAP improves planning through the interaction of specialized modules that break down a larger problem into multiple brief automated calls to the LLM. We evaluate MAP on three challenging planning tasks -- graph traversal, Tower of Hanoi, and the PlanBench benchmark -- as well as an NLP task requiring multi-step reasoning (strategyQA). We find that MAP yields significant improvements over both standard LLM methods (zero-shot prompting, in-context learning) and competitive baselines (chain-of-thought, multi-agent debate, and tree-of-thought), can be effectively combined with smaller and more cost-efficient LLMs (Llama3-70B), and displays superior transfer across tasks. These results suggest the benefit of a modular and multi-agent approach to planning with LLMs.
Read more10/7/2024
š¬
0
LASP: Surveying the State-of-the-Art in Large Language Model-Assisted AI Planning
Haoming Li, Zhaoliang Chen, Jonathan Zhang, Fei Liu
Effective planning is essential for the success of any task, from organizing a vacation to routing autonomous vehicles and developing corporate strategies. It involves setting goals, formulating plans, and allocating resources to achieve them. LLMs are particularly well-suited for automated planning due to their strong capabilities in commonsense reasoning. They can deduce a sequence of actions needed to achieve a goal from a given state and identify an effective course of action. However, it is frequently observed that plans generated through direct prompting often fail upon execution. Our survey aims to highlight the existing challenges in planning with language models, focusing on key areas such as embodied environments, optimal scheduling, competitive and cooperative games, task decomposition, reasoning, and planning. Through this study, we explore how LLMs transform AI planning and provide unique insights into the future of LM-assisted planning.
Read more9/4/2024
0
LLMs Can't Plan, But Can Help Planning in LLM-Modulo Frameworks
Subbarao Kambhampati, Karthik Valmeekam, Lin Guan, Mudit Verma, Kaya Stechly, Siddhant Bhambri, Lucas Saldyt, Anil Murthy
There is considerable confusion about the role of Large Language Models (LLMs) in planning and reasoning tasks. On one side are over-optimistic claims that LLMs can indeed do these tasks with just the right prompting or self-verification strategies. On the other side are perhaps over-pessimistic claims that all that LLMs are good for in planning/reasoning tasks are as mere translators of the problem specification from one syntactic format to another, and ship the problem off to external symbolic solvers. In this position paper, we take the view that both these extremes are misguided. We argue that auto-regressive LLMs cannot, by themselves, do planning or self-verification (which is after all a form of reasoning), and shed some light on the reasons for misunderstandings in the literature. We will also argue that LLMs should be viewed as universal approximate knowledge sources that have much more meaningful roles to play in planning/reasoning tasks beyond simple front-end/back-end format translators. We present a vision of {bf LLM-Modulo Frameworks} that combine the strengths of LLMs with external model-based verifiers in a tighter bi-directional interaction regime. We will show how the models driving the external verifiers themselves can be acquired with the help of LLMs. We will also argue that rather than simply pipelining LLMs and symbolic components, this LLM-Modulo Framework provides a better neuro-symbolic approach that offers tighter integration between LLMs and symbolic components, and allows extending the scope of model-based planning/reasoning regimes towards more flexible knowledge, problem and preference specifications.
Read more6/13/2024
š¬
0
Graph-enhanced Large Language Models in Asynchronous Plan Reasoning
Fangru Lin, Emanuele La Malfa, Valentin Hofmann, Elle Michelle Yang, Anthony Cohn, Janet B. Pierrehumbert
Planning is a fundamental property of human intelligence. Reasoning about asynchronous plans is challenging since it requires sequential and parallel planning to optimize time costs. Can large language models (LLMs) succeed at this task? Here, we present the first large-scale study investigating this question. We find that a representative set of closed and open-source LLMs, including GPT-4 and LLaMA-2, behave poorly when not supplied with illustrations about the task-solving process in our benchmark AsyncHow. We propose a novel technique called Plan Like a Graph (PLaG) that combines graphs with natural language prompts and achieves state-of-the-art results. We show that although PLaG can boost model performance, LLMs still suffer from drastic degradation when task complexity increases, highlighting the limits of utilizing LLMs for simulating digital devices. We see our study as an exciting step towards using LLMs as efficient autonomous agents. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/fangru-lin/graph-llm-asynchow-plan.
Read more6/4/2024