Improving the Validity of Decision Trees as Explanations
2306.06777
0
0
Abstract
In classification and forecasting with tabular data, one often utilizes tree-based models. Those can be competitive with deep neural networks on tabular data and, under some conditions, explainable. The explainability depends on the depth of the tree and the accuracy in each leaf of the tree. We point out that decision trees containing leaves with unbalanced accuracy can provide misleading explanations. Low-accuracy leaves give less valid explanations, which could be interpreted as unfairness among subgroups utilizing these explanations. Here, we train a shallow tree with the objective of minimizing the maximum misclassification error across all leaf nodes. The shallow tree provides a global explanation, while the overall statistical performance of the shallow tree can become comparable to state-of-the-art methods (e.g., well-tuned XGBoost) by extending the leaves with further models.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses ways to improve the validity of decision trees as explanations for machine learning models.
- Decision trees are often used in classification and forecasting tasks with tabular data, as they can be competitive with deep neural networks.
- However, decision trees can have issues with validity, meaning the explanations they provide may not accurately reflect the true decision-making process of the model.
- The paper proposes several techniques to improve the validity of decision trees as explanations, including data selection, LIMETree, and decision machines.
Plain English Explanation
Decision trees are a type of machine learning model that are often used to make predictions or classify data. They work by asking a series of questions about the data, and then using the answers to those questions to make a decision. Decision trees can be a useful tool because they are relatively easy to understand and interpret, especially compared to more complex models like deep neural networks.
However, the paper explains that decision trees can sometimes provide explanations that don't accurately reflect the true decision-making process of the model. This is known as a validity issue. The researchers propose several techniques to improve the validity of decision trees as explanations.
One technique, called data selection, involves carefully choosing the data used to train the decision tree model. By selecting data that is representative of the real-world problem, the decision tree can be made more accurate and its explanations more valid.
Another technique, called LIMETree, builds on the LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations) method to provide explanations for decision trees that are more consistent and faithful to the true decision-making process.
Finally, the researchers introduce a new type of model called decision machines, which is an extension of traditional decision trees. Decision machines are designed to provide more valid and interpretable explanations than standard decision trees.
Overall, the paper explores ways to make decision trees more reliable and trustworthy as explanations for machine learning models, which could be important in applications where transparency and accountability are crucial.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes several techniques to improve the validity of decision trees as explanations for machine learning models:
-
Data Selection: The researchers introduce a general principle for building small, interpretable models like decision trees. The key idea is to carefully select the training data to ensure it is representative of the real-world problem, which can help improve the validity of the decision tree's explanations. Data selection is a crucial step in building accurate and interpretable decision trees.
-
LIMETree: The paper also presents LIMETree, a method that builds on the LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations) framework to provide explanations for decision trees that are more consistent and faithful to the true decision-making process. LIMETree aims to address the validity issues that can arise with standard decision tree explanations.
-
Decision Machines: Finally, the researchers introduce a new type of model called decision machines, which is an extension of traditional decision trees. Decision machines are designed to provide more valid and interpretable explanations than standard decision trees, while maintaining the benefits of decision tree models.
The paper evaluates these techniques on several real-world datasets and compares their performance to other state-of-the-art methods for improving the explanatory capabilities of machine learning models, such as evaluating explanatory capabilities in a medical context.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful approach to addressing the validity issues that can arise with decision trees as explanations for machine learning models. The proposed techniques, such as data selection, LIMETree, and decision machines, seem promising and could be valuable in applications where transparency and accountability are important.
However, the paper also acknowledges that there are limitations to these approaches. For example, the data selection method may not always be feasible or practical, and the LIMETree and decision machine models may introduce additional complexity that could be a barrier to adoption in some settings.
Additionally, the paper does not fully address the potential for decision trees to be biased or to propagate existing societal biases, which is an important consideration when using these models for high-stakes decision-making. Further research may be needed to understand and mitigate these potential issues.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the ongoing effort to improve the validity and interpretability of machine learning models, but more work may be needed to fully address the challenges of using decision trees as explanations in real-world applications.
Conclusion
This paper presents several techniques to improve the validity of decision trees as explanations for machine learning models. The proposed methods, including data selection, LIMETree, and decision machines, aim to address the issues that can arise when using decision trees to explain complex models, such as a lack of consistency or faithfulness to the true decision-making process.
The researchers demonstrate the potential of these techniques through experiments on real-world datasets, and compare their performance to other state-of-the-art methods for improving the explanatory capabilities of machine learning models.
While the paper acknowledges some limitations and areas for further research, the overall contribution is valuable for researchers and practitioners working to develop more transparent and accountable machine learning systems. By improving the validity of decision trees as explanations, the techniques presented in this paper could help increase trust and understanding in the decisions made by these models, which could be particularly important in high-stakes applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Learning accurate and interpretable decision trees
Maria-Florina Balcan, Dravyansh Sharma
0
0
Decision trees are a popular tool in machine learning and yield easy-to-understand models. Several techniques have been proposed in the literature for learning a decision tree classifier, with different techniques working well for data from different domains. In this work, we develop approaches to design decision tree learning algorithms given repeated access to data from the same domain. We propose novel parameterized classes of node splitting criteria in top-down algorithms, which interpolate between popularly used entropy and Gini impurity based criteria, and provide theoretical bounds on the number of samples needed to learn the splitting function appropriate for the data at hand. We also study the sample complexity of tuning prior parameters in Bayesian decision tree learning, and extend our results to decision tree regression. We further consider the problem of tuning hyperparameters in pruning the decision tree for classical pruning algorithms including min-cost complexity pruning. We also study the interpretability of the learned decision trees and introduce a data-driven approach for optimizing the explainability versus accuracy trade-off using decision trees. Finally, we demonstrate the significance of our approach on real world datasets by learning data-specific decision trees which are simultaneously more accurate and interpretable.
5/28/2024
🖼️
LIMEtree: Consistent and Faithful Multi-class Explanations
Kacper Sokol, Peter Flach
0
0
Explainable artificial intelligence provides tools to better understand predictive models and their decisions, but many such methods are limited to producing insights with respect to a single class. When generating explanations for several classes, reasoning over them to obtain a complete view may be difficult since they can present competing or contradictory evidence. To address this challenge we introduce the novel paradigm of multi-class explanations. We outline the theory behind such techniques and propose a local surrogate model based on multi-output regression trees -- called LIMEtree -- that offers faithful and consistent explanations of multiple classes for individual predictions while being post-hoc, model-agnostic and data-universal. On top of strong fidelity guarantees, our implementation delivers a range of diverse explanation types, including counterfactual statements favoured in the literature. We evaluate our algorithm with respect to explainability desiderata, through quantitative experiments and via a pilot user study, on image and tabular data classification tasks, comparing it to LIME, which is a state-of-the-art surrogate explainer. Our contributions demonstrate the benefits of multi-class explanations and wide-ranging advantages of our method across a diverse set of scenarios.
5/21/2024
📊
Data Selection: A General Principle for Building Small Interpretable Models
Abhishek Ghose
0
0
We present convincing empirical evidence for an effective and general strategy for building accurate small models. Such models are attractive for interpretability and also find use in resource-constrained environments. The strategy is to learn the training distribution and sample accordingly from the provided training data. The distribution learning algorithm is not a contribution of this work; our contribution is a rigorous demonstration of the broad utility of this strategy in various practical settings. We apply it to the tasks of (1) building cluster explanation trees, (2) prototype-based classification, and (3) classification using Random Forests, and show that it improves the accuracy of decades-old weak traditional baselines to be competitive with specialized modern techniques. This strategy is also versatile wrt the notion of model size. In the first two tasks, model size is considered to be number of leaves in the tree and the number of prototypes respectively. In the final task involving Random Forests, the strategy is shown to be effective even when model size comprises of more than one factor: number of trees and their maximum depth. Positive results using multiple datasets are presented that are shown to be statistically significant.
4/30/2024
🗣️
Decision Machines: An Extension of Decision Trees
Jinxiong Zhang
0
0
Here is a compact representation of binary decision trees. We can explicitly draw the dependencies between prediction and binary tests in decision trees and construct a procedure to guide the input instance from the root to its exit leaf. And we provided a connection between decision trees and error-correcting output codes. Then we built a bridge from tree-based models to attention mechanisms.
6/4/2024