Data Selection: A General Principle for Building Small Interpretable Models

2210.03921

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/30/2024 by Abhishek Ghose

📊

Abstract

We present convincing empirical evidence for an effective and general strategy for building accurate small models. Such models are attractive for interpretability and also find use in resource-constrained environments. The strategy is to learn the training distribution and sample accordingly from the provided training data. The distribution learning algorithm is not a contribution of this work; our contribution is a rigorous demonstration of the broad utility of this strategy in various practical settings. We apply it to the tasks of (1) building cluster explanation trees, (2) prototype-based classification, and (3) classification using Random Forests, and show that it improves the accuracy of decades-old weak traditional baselines to be competitive with specialized modern techniques. This strategy is also versatile wrt the notion of model size. In the first two tasks, model size is considered to be number of leaves in the tree and the number of prototypes respectively. In the final task involving Random Forests, the strategy is shown to be effective even when model size comprises of more than one factor: number of trees and their maximum depth. Positive results using multiple datasets are presented that are shown to be statistically significant.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper presents a strategy for building accurate small models, which are useful for interpretability and resource-constrained environments.
  • The strategy involves learning the training data distribution and sampling accordingly to improve the performance of various machine learning tasks.
  • The authors apply this strategy to three different tasks: building cluster explanation trees, prototype-based classification, and classification using Random Forests.
  • The results show that this strategy can improve the accuracy of traditional baseline models to be competitive with specialized modern techniques.

Plain English Explanation

The paper describes a strategy for building small, accurate machine learning models. The key idea is to learn the distribution of the training data and then use that knowledge to sample more effectively from the data. This can help improve the performance of various machine learning tasks, even for older, simpler models.

For example, imagine you're trying to build a small decision tree to explain a dataset. Instead of just using the data as-is, the strategy suggests first understanding the overall distribution of the data. Then, you can sample from that distribution in a smart way to train a more accurate tree with fewer branches.

The authors show this strategy works well for three different tasks: explaining clusters of data, classifying using prototypes, and building Random Forests. In each case, the strategy helps take traditional, simple models and make them competitive with more modern, complex techniques.

The key benefit of this approach is that it allows you to build small, interpretable models that still perform well. This can be very useful in situations where you need a model that's easy to understand, or where you have limited computational resources.

Technical Explanation

The paper's main contribution is a rigorous demonstration of the broad utility of a strategy for building accurate small models. The strategy involves learning the training data distribution and sampling accordingly from the provided training data.

The authors apply this strategy to three different tasks:

  1. Building cluster explanation trees: The goal is to create a small decision tree that can effectively explain the clusters in a dataset. The strategy involves learning the distribution of the data and sampling from it to train the tree.

  2. Prototype-based classification: Here, the goal is to build a classifier using a small set of prototypes (representative examples) from the data. Again, the strategy is to learn the data distribution and sample prototypes accordingly.

  3. Classification using Random Forests: In this case, the authors show the strategy is effective even when the model size comprises multiple factors, such as the number of trees and their maximum depth.

For each task, the authors demonstrate that their strategy can improve the accuracy of traditional baseline models to be competitive with specialized modern techniques. They present positive results using multiple datasets and show the improvements are statistically significant.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and rigorous exploration of the proposed strategy, and the results are quite compelling. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  • The paper focuses on relatively simple model types, such as decision trees and Random Forests. It would be interesting to see how the strategy performs with more complex neural network models.
  • The authors note that the distribution learning algorithm is not a contribution of this work, and they rely on existing techniques. Investigating more advanced distribution learning methods could potentially further improve the strategy's effectiveness.
  • The paper does not delve into the practical considerations of implementing this strategy in real-world scenarios, such as computational overhead or the sensitivity to the quality of the distribution learning.

Overall, the paper presents a promising approach for building accurate small models and demonstrates its broad applicability. Further exploration of the strategy's limitations and potential extensions could lead to even more impactful advancements in this area.

Conclusion

This paper introduces an effective and general strategy for building accurate small machine learning models. By learning the distribution of the training data and sampling accordingly, the authors show significant improvements in the performance of various tasks, including cluster explanation, prototype-based classification, and Random Forest classification.

The strategy's versatility with respect to model size and its ability to boost the accuracy of traditional baseline models to be competitive with specialized modern techniques make it a promising approach for building interpretable and resource-efficient models. As the authors note, further research into more advanced distribution learning methods and the practical considerations of implementing this strategy could lead to even more impactful advancements in this important area of machine learning.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Learning accurate and interpretable decision trees

Learning accurate and interpretable decision trees

Maria-Florina Balcan, Dravyansh Sharma

YC

0

Reddit

0

Decision trees are a popular tool in machine learning and yield easy-to-understand models. Several techniques have been proposed in the literature for learning a decision tree classifier, with different techniques working well for data from different domains. In this work, we develop approaches to design decision tree learning algorithms given repeated access to data from the same domain. We propose novel parameterized classes of node splitting criteria in top-down algorithms, which interpolate between popularly used entropy and Gini impurity based criteria, and provide theoretical bounds on the number of samples needed to learn the splitting function appropriate for the data at hand. We also study the sample complexity of tuning prior parameters in Bayesian decision tree learning, and extend our results to decision tree regression. We further consider the problem of tuning hyperparameters in pruning the decision tree for classical pruning algorithms including min-cost complexity pruning. We also study the interpretability of the learned decision trees and introduce a data-driven approach for optimizing the explainability versus accuracy trade-off using decision trees. Finally, we demonstrate the significance of our approach on real world datasets by learning data-specific decision trees which are simultaneously more accurate and interpretable.

Read more

5/28/2024

Improving the Validity of Decision Trees as Explanations

Improving the Validity of Decision Trees as Explanations

Jiri Nemecek, Tomas Pevny, Jakub Marecek

YC

0

Reddit

0

In classification and forecasting with tabular data, one often utilizes tree-based models. Those can be competitive with deep neural networks on tabular data and, under some conditions, explainable. The explainability depends on the depth of the tree and the accuracy in each leaf of the tree. We point out that decision trees containing leaves with unbalanced accuracy can provide misleading explanations. Low-accuracy leaves give less valid explanations, which could be interpreted as unfairness among subgroups utilizing these explanations. Here, we train a shallow tree with the objective of minimizing the maximum misclassification error across all leaf nodes. The shallow tree provides a global explanation, while the overall statistical performance of the shallow tree can become comparable to state-of-the-art methods (e.g., well-tuned XGBoost) by extending the leaves with further models.

Read more

6/5/2024

🏷️

Fair Classification with Partial Feedback: An Exploration-Based Data Collection Approach

Vijay Keswani, Anay Mehrotra, L. Elisa Celis

YC

0

Reddit

0

In many predictive contexts (e.g., credit lending), true outcomes are only observed for samples that were positively classified in the past. These past observations, in turn, form training datasets for classifiers that make future predictions. However, such training datasets lack information about the outcomes of samples that were (incorrectly) negatively classified in the past and can lead to erroneous classifiers. We present an approach that trains a classifier using available data and comes with a family of exploration strategies to collect outcome data about subpopulations that otherwise would have been ignored. For any exploration strategy, the approach comes with guarantees that (1) all sub-populations are explored, (2) the fraction of false positives is bounded, and (3) the trained classifier converges to a ``desired'' classifier. The right exploration strategy is context-dependent; it can be chosen to improve learning guarantees and encode context-specific group fairness properties. Evaluation on real-world datasets shows that this approach consistently boosts the quality of collected outcome data and improves the fraction of true positives for all groups, with only a small reduction in predictive utility.

Read more

6/4/2024

📊

Bayesian Data Selection

Julian Rodemann

YC

0

Reddit

0

A wide range of machine learning algorithms iteratively add data to the training sample. Examples include semi-supervised learning, active learning, multi-armed bandits, and Bayesian optimization. We embed this kind of data addition into decision theory by framing data selection as a decision problem. This paves the way for finding Bayes-optimal selections of data. For the illustrative case of self-training in semi-supervised learning, we derive the respective Bayes criterion. We further show that deploying this criterion mitigates the issue of confirmation bias by empirically assessing our method for generalized linear models, semi-parametric generalized additive models, and Bayesian neural networks on simulated and real-world data.

Read more

6/26/2024