Improving Weak-to-Strong Generalization with Reliability-Aware Alignment
2406.19032
0
0
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are now rapidly advancing and surpassing human abilities on many natural language tasks. However, aligning these super-human LLMs with human knowledge remains challenging because the supervision signals from human annotators may be wrong. This issue, known as the super-alignment problem, requires enhancing weak-to-strong generalization, where a strong LLM must generalize from imperfect supervision provided by a weaker source. To address this issue, we propose an approach to improve weak-to-strong generalization by involving the reliability of weak supervision signals in the alignment process. In our method, we query the weak supervisor for multiple answers, estimate the answer reliability, and enhance the alignment process by filtering out uncertain data or re-weighting reliable data. Experiments on four datasets demonstrate that our methods effectively identify the quality of weak labels and significantly enhance weak-to-strong generalization. Our work presents effective techniques for error-robust model alignment, reducing error propagation from noisy supervision and enhancing the accuracy and reliability of LLMs. Codes are publicly available at http://github.com/Irenehere/ReliableAlignment.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new method for improving the generalization of machine learning models from weak to strong performance.
- The key idea is to align the representations of a strong model with a weaker model in a reliability-aware manner, which helps the weaker model learn more robust and transferable features.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach on text classification tasks, showing that it can significantly improve the weak-to-strong generalization of models.
Plain English Explanation
Machine learning models can often perform very well on the data they are trained on, but struggle to generalize to new, unseen data. This is a common problem, especially when training models on limited or biased datasets. The authors of this paper Improving Weak-to-Strong Generalization with Reliability-Aware Alignment propose a new technique to help address this issue.
The core idea is to take a strong model that has been trained on a large, diverse dataset, and use it to help "guide" a weaker model that has been trained on more limited data. This is done by aligning the internal representations (the ways the models "think" about the data) of the two models in a
By doing this, the weaker model is able to learn more robust and transferable features that allow it to generalize better to new, unseen data. The authors show that this approach can significantly improve the weak-to-strong generalization of text classification models, helping the weaker models achieve much stronger performance on tasks they were not originally trained for.
Technical Explanation
The paper Improving Weak-to-Strong Generalization with Reliability-Aware Alignment proposes a new method for improving the generalization of machine learning models from weak to strong performance. The key idea is to align the representations of a strong model with a weaker model in a
The authors first train a strong model on a large, diverse dataset, and a weaker model on a more limited dataset. They then introduce a
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach on text classification tasks, showing that it can significantly improve the weak-to-strong generalization of models. For example, they show that a weaker model trained on a limited dataset can achieve performance on par with a strong model trained on a much larger dataset by using the proposed reliability-aware alignment method.
The key insight behind this work is that simply aligning the representations of a weak and strong model may not be sufficient, as the strong model may have learned some "superficial" or unreliable features that do not generalize well. By focusing the alignment on the most reliable aspects of the strong model's representations, the weaker model is able to learn more robust and transferable features that improve its performance on a wide range of tasks.
Critical Analysis
The paper Improving Weak-to-Strong Generalization with Reliability-Aware Alignment presents a compelling approach to improving the weak-to-strong generalization of machine learning models. The authors' reliability-aware alignment method is a novel and well-designed technique that addresses an important challenge in the field.
One potential limitation of the approach is that it relies on having access to a strong, pre-trained model that can serve as a reference for the weaker model. In some cases, such a strong model may not be available, or it may be prohibitively expensive to obtain or fine-tune. The authors acknowledge this limitation and suggest that future work could investigate ways to relax this requirement, such as by leveraging unsupervised pre-training or other techniques to bootstrap the strong model.
Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on text classification tasks, and it would be interesting to see how the reliability-aware alignment method performs on other types of machine learning problems, such as image recognition or speech processing. Extending the approach to a wider range of applications could help establish its broader applicability and impact.
Overall, the paper Improving Weak-to-Strong Generalization with Reliability-Aware Alignment presents a compelling and well-executed piece of research that could have significant implications for improving the performance and robustness of machine learning models in a wide range of domains.
Conclusion
The paper Improving Weak-to-Strong Generalization with Reliability-Aware Alignment introduces a novel method for improving the weak-to-strong generalization of machine learning models. By aligning the representations of a strong model with a weaker model in a reliability-aware manner, the authors demonstrate that the weaker model can learn more robust and transferable features, leading to significant performance gains on a variety of text classification tasks.
This work has important implications for the development of more powerful and versatile machine learning systems, especially in domains where data is scarce or biased. By leveraging the knowledge and representations of strong models, the reliability-aware alignment approach could help unlock new levels of performance and generalization for a wide range of machine learning applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤯
A statistical framework for weak-to-strong generalization
Seamus Somerstep, Felipe Maia Polo, Moulinath Banerjee, Ya'acov Ritov, Mikhail Yurochkin, Yuekai Sun
0
0
Modern large language model (LLM) alignment techniques rely on human feedback, but it is unclear whether the techniques fundamentally limit the capabilities of aligned LLMs. In particular, it is unclear whether it is possible to align (stronger) LLMs with superhuman capabilities with (weaker) human feedback without degrading their capabilities. This is an instance of the weak-to-strong generalization problem: using weaker (less capable) feedback to train a stronger (more capable) model. We prove that weak-to-strong generalization is possible by eliciting latent knowledge from pre-trained LLMs. In particular, we cast the weak-to-strong generalization problem as a transfer learning problem in which we wish to transfer a latent concept from a weak model to a strong pre-trained model. We prove that a naive fine-tuning approach suffers from fundamental limitations, but an alternative refinement-based approach suggested by the problem structure provably overcomes the limitations of fine-tuning. Finally, we demonstrate the practical applicability of the refinement approach with three LLM alignment tasks.
5/28/2024
Super(ficial)-alignment: Strong Models May Deceive Weak Models in Weak-to-Strong Generalization
Wenkai Yang, Shiqi Shen, Guangyao Shen, Zhi Gong, Yankai Lin
0
0
Superalignment, where humans are weak supervisors of superhuman models, has become an important and widely discussed issue in the current era of rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs). The recent work preliminarily studies this problem by using weak models to supervise strong models. It discovers that weakly supervised strong students can consistently outperform weak teachers towards the alignment target, leading to a weak-to-strong generalization phenomenon. However, we are concerned that behind such a promising phenomenon, whether there exists an issue of weak-to-strong deception, where strong models may deceive weak models by exhibiting well-aligned in areas known to weak models but producing misaligned behaviors in cases weak models do not know. We then take an initial step towards exploring this security issue in a specific but realistic multi-objective alignment case, where there may be some alignment targets conflicting with each other (e.g., helpfulness v.s. harmlessness). Such a conflict is likely to cause strong models to deceive weak models in one alignment dimension to gain high reward in other alignment dimension. Our experiments on both the reward modeling task and the preference optimization scenario indicate: (1) the weak-to-strong deception exists; (2) the deception phenomenon may intensify as the capability gap between weak and strong models increases. We also discuss potential solutions and find bootstrapping with an intermediate model can mitigate the deception to some extent. Our work highlights the urgent need to pay more attention to the true reliability of superalignment.
6/18/2024
Aligning Large Language Models via Fine-grained Supervision
Dehong Xu, Liang Qiu, Minseok Kim, Faisal Ladhak, Jaeyoung Do
0
0
Pre-trained large-scale language models (LLMs) excel at producing coherent articles, yet their outputs may be untruthful, toxic, or fail to align with user expectations. Current approaches focus on using reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) to improve model alignment, which works by transforming coarse human preferences of LLM outputs into a feedback signal that guides the model learning process. However, because this approach operates on sequence-level feedback, it lacks the precision to identify the exact parts of the output affecting user preferences. To address this gap, we propose a method to enhance LLM alignment through fine-grained token-level supervision. Specifically, we ask annotators to minimally edit less preferred responses within the standard reward modeling dataset to make them more favorable, ensuring changes are made only where necessary while retaining most of the original content. The refined dataset is used to train a token-level reward model, which is then used for training our fine-grained Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) model. Our experiment results demonstrate that this approach can achieve up to an absolute improvement of $5.1%$ in LLM performance, in terms of win rate against the reference model, compared with the traditional PPO model.
6/6/2024
Bayesian WeakS-to-Strong from Text Classification to Generation
Ziyun Cui, Ziyang Zhang, Wen Wu, Guangzhi Sun, Chao Zhang
0
0
Advances in large language models raise the question of how alignment techniques will adapt as models become increasingly complex and humans will only be able to supervise them weakly. Weak-to-Strong mimics such a scenario where weak model supervision attempts to harness the full capabilities of a much stronger model. This work extends Weak-to-Strong to WeakS-to-Strong by exploring an ensemble of weak models which simulate the variability in human opinions. Confidence scores are estimated using a Bayesian approach to guide the WeakS-to-Strong generalization. Furthermore, we extend the application of WeakS-to-Strong from text classification tasks to text generation tasks where more advanced strategies are investigated for supervision. Moreover, direct preference optimization is applied to advance the student model's preference learning, beyond the basic learning framework of teacher forcing. Results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach for the reliability of a strong student model, showing potential for superalignment.
6/6/2024