Aligning Large Language Models via Fine-grained Supervision
2406.02756
0
0
Abstract
Pre-trained large-scale language models (LLMs) excel at producing coherent articles, yet their outputs may be untruthful, toxic, or fail to align with user expectations. Current approaches focus on using reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) to improve model alignment, which works by transforming coarse human preferences of LLM outputs into a feedback signal that guides the model learning process. However, because this approach operates on sequence-level feedback, it lacks the precision to identify the exact parts of the output affecting user preferences. To address this gap, we propose a method to enhance LLM alignment through fine-grained token-level supervision. Specifically, we ask annotators to minimally edit less preferred responses within the standard reward modeling dataset to make them more favorable, ensuring changes are made only where necessary while retaining most of the original content. The refined dataset is used to train a token-level reward model, which is then used for training our fine-grained Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) model. Our experiment results demonstrate that this approach can achieve up to an absolute improvement of $5.1%$ in LLM performance, in terms of win rate against the reference model, compared with the traditional PPO model.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores a technique for aligning large language models with human preferences and values using fine-grained supervision.
- The researchers propose a method that leverages targeted feedback on specific model outputs to fine-tune the model and better align it with desired behaviors.
- The work builds on prior research on aligning language models with human preferences and using reinforcement learning for model alignment.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers are working on a challenging problem: how to ensure that powerful AI language models behave in ways that are aligned with human values and preferences. Large language models like GPT-3 can generate human-like text on a wide range of topics, but left unchecked, they may produce outputs that are biased, harmful, or misaligned with what humans want.
The key idea in this paper is to use "fine-grained supervision" to guide the language model towards more desirable behavior. Instead of just providing the model with broad, high-level instructions, the researchers give it targeted feedback on specific outputs. For example, the model might generate a paragraph of text, and the researchers would then provide feedback on which parts of that output were good or bad, and why. By iterating this process, the model can gradually learn to produce text that better matches human values.
This approach builds on prior work that has explored using reinforcement learning and aligning models with preferences expressed through samples or demonstrations. The key innovation here is the focus on fine-grained, targeted feedback to shape the model's behavior at a more granular level.
Technical Explanation
The researchers propose a method for aligning large language models with human preferences and values using fine-grained supervision. Their approach involves iteratively providing the model with feedback on specific generated outputs, allowing the model to learn which outputs are preferred and gradually align its behavior accordingly.
The core of the method is a training loop where the model first generates some text, which is then evaluated by human raters who provide feedback on the quality and alignment of different aspects of the output. This fine-grained feedback is then used to update the model's parameters, nudging it towards generating more preferred outputs in the future.
The authors draw inspiration from prior work on aligning language models with human preferences and using reinforcement learning for model alignment, as well as research on leveraging fine-grained quality signals and linear alignment with a closed-form solution. The key innovation is the focus on providing targeted, granular feedback to the model during training, which the authors argue can lead to more robust and reliable alignment.
The authors evaluate their approach on a range of language modeling tasks and find that the fine-grained supervision leads to significant improvements in alignment compared to baselines. They also conduct analyses to better understand the properties of the aligned models and the tradeoffs involved in the approach.
Critical Analysis
The researchers present a compelling approach for aligning large language models with human preferences and values. The focus on fine-grained supervision is a promising direction, as it allows the model to learn at a more granular level compared to high-level rewards or demonstrations.
That said, the paper does acknowledge some limitations and areas for further exploration. For example, the authors note that the fine-grained feedback process can be time-consuming and resource-intensive, as it requires human raters to carefully evaluate the model's outputs. Exploring more scalable approaches to generating this feedback could be an important next step.
Additionally, the paper does not deeply explore the long-term robustness and stability of the aligned models. It would be valuable to understand how the models behave when faced with distributional shift or adversarial attacks, and whether the fine-grained alignment holds up under these more challenging conditions.
Overall, this work represents an important step forward in the critical challenge of aligning powerful AI systems with human values and preferences. The fine-grained supervision approach is a promising direction, and continued research in this area could yield valuable insights and techniques for building more trustworthy and beneficial AI.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel method for aligning large language models with human preferences and values using fine-grained supervision. By providing the model with targeted feedback on specific outputs, the researchers show that it is possible to shape the model's behavior to better match desired characteristics.
The work builds on and extends prior research in this area, demonstrating the value of fine-grained, granular feedback for model alignment. While the approach has some limitations, it represents an important contribution to the ongoing efforts to ensure that powerful AI systems are developed and deployed in ways that are beneficial to humanity.
As AI capabilities continue to advance, developing effective techniques for aligning these systems with human values will be crucial. The insights and methods explored in this paper offer a promising path forward, and further research in this direction could have significant implications for the responsible development of transformative AI technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Privately Aligning Language Models with Reinforcement Learning
Fan Wu, Huseyin A. Inan, Arturs Backurs, Varun Chandrasekaran, Janardhan Kulkarni, Robert Sim
0
0
Positioned between pre-training and user deployment, aligning large language models (LLMs) through reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a prevailing strategy for training instruction following-models such as ChatGPT. In this work, we initiate the study of privacy-preserving alignment of LLMs through Differential Privacy (DP) in conjunction with RL. Following the influential work of Ziegler et al. (2020), we study two dominant paradigms: (i) alignment via RL without human in the loop (e.g., positive review generation) and (ii) alignment via RL from human feedback (RLHF) (e.g., summarization in a human-preferred way). We give a new DP framework to achieve alignment via RL, and prove its correctness. Our experimental results validate the effectiveness of our approach, offering competitive utility while ensuring strong privacy protections.
5/6/2024
🏋️
Beyond Imitation: Leveraging Fine-grained Quality Signals for Alignment
Geyang Guo, Ranchi Zhao, Tianyi Tang, Wayne Xin Zhao, Ji-Rong Wen
0
0
Alignment with human preference is a desired property of large language models (LLMs). Currently, the main alignment approach is based on reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). Despite the effectiveness of RLHF, it is intricate to implement and train, thus recent studies explore how to develop alternative alignment approaches based on supervised fine-tuning (SFT). A major limitation of SFT is that it essentially does imitation learning, which cannot fully understand what are the expected behaviors. To address this issue, we propose an improved alignment approach named FIGA. Different from prior methods, we incorporate fine-grained (i.e., token or phrase level) quality signals that are derived by contrasting good and bad responses. Our approach has made two major contributions. Firstly, we curate a refined alignment dataset that pairs initial responses and the corresponding revised ones. Secondly, we devise a new loss function can leverage fine-grained quality signals to instruct the learning of LLMs for alignment. Extensive experiments have demonstrated the effectiveness of our approaches by comparing a number of competitive baselines.
4/16/2024
💬
Aligning language models with human preferences
Tomasz Korbak
0
0
Language models (LMs) trained on vast quantities of text data can acquire sophisticated skills such as generating summaries, answering questions or generating code. However, they also manifest behaviors that violate human preferences, e.g., they can generate offensive content, falsehoods or perpetuate social biases. In this thesis, I explore several approaches to aligning LMs with human preferences. First, I argue that aligning LMs can be seen as Bayesian inference: conditioning a prior (base, pretrained LM) on evidence about human preferences (Chapter 2). Conditioning on human preferences can be implemented in numerous ways. In Chapter 3, I investigate the relation between two approaches to finetuning pretrained LMs using feedback given by a scoring function: reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) and distribution matching. I show that RLHF can be seen as a special case of distribution matching but distributional matching is strictly more general. In chapter 4, I show how to extend the distribution matching to conditional language models. Finally, in chapter 5 I explore a different root: conditioning an LM on human preferences already during pretraining. I show that involving human feedback from the very start tends to be more effective than using it only during supervised finetuning. Overall, these results highlight the room for alignment techniques different from and complementary to RLHF.
4/19/2024
Linear Alignment: A Closed-form Solution for Aligning Human Preferences without Tuning and Feedback
Songyang Gao, Qiming Ge, Wei Shen, Shihan Dou, Junjie Ye, Xiao Wang, Rui Zheng, Yicheng Zou, Zhi Chen, Hang Yan, Qi Zhang, Dahua Lin
0
0
The success of AI assistants based on Language Models (LLMs) hinges on Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) to comprehend and align with user intentions. However, traditional alignment algorithms, such as PPO, are hampered by complex annotation and training requirements. This reliance limits the applicability of RLHF and hinders the development of professional assistants tailored to diverse human preferences. In this work, we introduce textit{Linear Alignment}, a novel algorithm that aligns language models with human preferences in one single inference step, eliminating the reliance on data annotation and model training. Linear alignment incorporates a new parameterization for policy optimization under divergence constraints, which enables the extraction of optimal policy in a closed-form manner and facilitates the direct estimation of the aligned response. Extensive experiments on both general and personalized preference datasets demonstrate that linear alignment significantly enhances the performance and efficiency of LLM alignment across diverse scenarios. Our code and dataset is published on url{https://github.com/Wizardcoast/Linear_Alignment.git}.
5/7/2024