Incentivizing High-Quality Content in Online Recommender Systems
2306.07479
0
0
🎯
Abstract
In content recommender systems such as TikTok and YouTube, the platform's recommendation algorithm shapes content producer incentives. Many platforms employ online learning, which generates intertemporal incentives, since content produced today affects recommendations of future content. We study the game between producers and analyze the content created at equilibrium. We show that standard online learning algorithms, such as Hedge and EXP3, unfortunately incentivize producers to create low-quality content, where producers' effort approaches zero in the long run for typical learning rate schedules. Motivated by this negative result, we design learning algorithms that incentivize producers to invest high effort and achieve high user welfare. At a conceptual level, our work illustrates the unintended impact that a platform's learning algorithm can have on content quality and introduces algorithmic approaches to mitigating these effects.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores ways to incentivize high-quality content creation in online recommender systems.
- The researchers propose a novel approach that aligns the incentives of content creators and the recommender system.
- The goal is to encourage the production of valuable content that benefits users, rather than incentivizing the creation of low-quality content that maximizes short-term engagement.
Plain English Explanation
Online recommender systems, like those used by social media platforms and content streaming services, play a crucial role in shaping the content users see. However, these systems can sometimes incentivize the creation of low-quality content that is designed to maximize user engagement in the short-term, rather than providing truly valuable information or entertainment.
This paper proposes a new approach to address this problem. The researchers suggest aligning the incentives of content creators and the recommender system itself, so that both parties are motivated to produce high-quality content that benefits users in the long run.
By adjusting the recommender system's algorithms to reward content creators for making valuable contributions, rather than just maximizing engagement, the researchers aim to shift the ecosystem towards the production of content that users truly find useful or engaging.
This could help combat issues like the spread of misinformation or low-effort content on social media platforms, and ensure that recommender systems are promoting content that aligns with users' long-term interests, rather than just optimizing for short-term metrics.
By rethinking the incentive structures underlying recommender systems, the researchers hope to create a more sustainable and user-centric online content ecosystem.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a novel framework for incentivizing high-quality content creation in online recommender systems. The key idea is to design the recommender system's objective function to align the incentives of content creators with the long-term interests of users.
Traditionally, recommender systems have been optimized to maximize short-term user engagement metrics, such as click-through rate or time spent on the platform. This can lead content creators to focus on producing sensationalized or low-effort content that is designed to maximize these metrics, rather than creating truly valuable and informative content.
To address this issue, the researchers introduce an "incentive-aware" recommender system that explicitly incorporates the quality of content into its objective function. By rewarding content creators for producing high-quality content that benefits users, the system aims to shift the ecosystem towards the production of more useful and engaging material.
The paper presents a game-theoretic framework to model the interactions between the recommender system, content creators, and users. The researchers then derive an optimal recommendation policy that balances the interests of all parties. This involves estimating the "quality" of content based on user feedback and other signals, and using that information to adjust the recommender's rankings and rewards.
The proposed approach is evaluated through both theoretical analysis and simulations, which demonstrate its effectiveness in incentivizing high-quality content creation. The researchers also discuss potential extensions and challenges, such as dealing with strategic manipulation by content creators and scaling the framework to large-scale systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to address a significant challenge in the design of online recommender systems. By aligning the incentives of content creators and the recommender system itself, the researchers aim to shift the ecosystem towards the production of high-quality, user-centric content.
One key strength of the proposed framework is its grounding in game theory and optimization, which allows for a rigorous analysis of the strategic interactions between the different stakeholders. This helps to ensure that the recommended policies are robust and account for potential manipulation or misalignment of incentives.
However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and challenges that would need to be addressed in future work. For example, accurately estimating the "quality" of content is a notoriously difficult problem, and the researchers' approach may be vulnerable to strategic efforts by content creators to game the system.
Additionally, scaling the framework to large-scale, real-world recommender systems would likely require significant engineering effort and the development of efficient algorithms for content quality assessment and recommendation policy optimization.
Further research could also explore ways to incorporate user feedback and preferences more directly into the objective function, rather than relying solely on proxy measures of content quality.
Overall, the paper presents an interesting and well-executed approach to a critical challenge in the design of online recommender systems. While there are some open questions and areas for further development, the proposed framework offers a promising direction for incentivizing the creation of high-quality, user-centric content.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel approach to incentivizing high-quality content creation in online recommender systems. By aligning the objectives of the recommender system and content creators, the researchers aim to shift the ecosystem towards the production of valuable, user-centric content, rather than low-effort material designed to maximize short-term engagement.
The proposed framework leverages game-theoretic modeling and optimization to derive an optimal recommendation policy that balances the interests of all stakeholders. While the approach faces some challenges, such as accurately assessing content quality and scaling to large-scale systems, the paper presents a promising direction for addressing a critical issue in the design of online recommendation algorithms.
Overall, this research highlights the importance of rethinking the incentive structures underlying recommender systems, with the goal of creating a more sustainable and user-focused online content ecosystem.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🛠️
User Welfare Optimization in Recommender Systems with Competing Content Creators
Fan Yao, Yiming Liao, Mingzhe Wu, Chuanhao Li, Yan Zhu, James Yang, Qifan Wang, Haifeng Xu, Hongning Wang
0
0
Driven by the new economic opportunities created by the creator economy, an increasing number of content creators rely on and compete for revenue generated from online content recommendation platforms. This burgeoning competition reshapes the dynamics of content distribution and profoundly impacts long-term user welfare on the platform. However, the absence of a comprehensive picture of global user preference distribution often traps the competition, especially the creators, in states that yield sub-optimal user welfare. To encourage creators to best serve a broad user population with relevant content, it becomes the platform's responsibility to leverage its information advantage regarding user preference distribution to accurately signal creators. In this study, we perform system-side user welfare optimization under a competitive game setting among content creators. We propose an algorithmic solution for the platform, which dynamically computes a sequence of weights for each user based on their satisfaction of the recommended content. These weights are then utilized to design mechanisms that adjust the recommendation policy or the post-recommendation rewards, thereby influencing creators' content production strategies. To validate the effectiveness of our proposed method, we report our findings from a series of experiments, including: 1. a proof-of-concept negative example illustrating how creators' strategies converge towards sub-optimal states without platform intervention; 2. offline experiments employing our proposed intervention mechanisms on diverse datasets; and 3. results from a three-week online experiment conducted on a leading short-video recommendation platform.
4/30/2024
🌿
Incentive-Aware Recommender Systems in Two-Sided Markets
Xiaowu Dai, Wenlu Xu, Yuan Qi, Michael I. Jordan
0
0
Online platforms in the Internet Economy commonly incorporate recommender systems that recommend products (or arms) to users (or agents). A key challenge in this domain arises from myopic agents who are naturally incentivized to exploit by choosing the optimal arm based on current information, rather than exploring various alternatives to gather information that benefits the collective. We propose a novel recommender system that aligns with agents' incentives while achieving asymptotically optimal performance, as measured by regret in repeated interactions. Our framework models this incentive-aware system as a multi-agent bandit problem in two-sided markets, where the interactions of agents and arms are facilitated by recommender systems on online platforms. This model incorporates incentive constraints induced by agents' opportunity costs. In scenarios where opportunity costs are known to the platform, we show the existence of an incentive-compatible recommendation algorithm. This algorithm pools recommendations between a genuinely good arm and an unknown arm using a randomized and adaptive strategy. Moreover, when these opportunity costs are unknown, we introduce an algorithm that randomly pools recommendations across all arms, utilizing the cumulative loss from each arm as feedback for strategic exploration. We demonstrate that both algorithms satisfy an ex-post fairness criterion, which protects agents from over-exploitation. All code for using the proposed algorithms and reproducing results is made available on GitHub.
6/19/2024
✨
Leveraging Recommender Systems to Reduce Content Gaps on Peer Production Platforms
Mo Houtti, Isaac Johnson, Morten Warncke-Wang, Loren Terveen
0
0
Peer production platforms like Wikipedia commonly suffer from content gaps. Prior research suggests recommender systems can help solve this problem, by guiding editors towards underrepresented topics. However, it remains unclear whether this approach would result in less relevant recommendations, leading to reduced overall engagement with recommended items. To answer this question, we first conducted offline analyses (Study 1) on SuggestBot, a task-routing recommender system for Wikipedia, then did a three-month controlled experiment (Study 2). Our results show that presenting users with articles from underrepresented topics increased the proportion of work done on those articles without significantly reducing overall recommendation uptake. We discuss the implications of our results, including how ignoring the article discovery process can artificially narrow recommendations on peer production platforms.
4/11/2024
Monitoring the Evolution of Behavioural Embeddings in Social Media Recommendation
Srijan Saket, Olivier Jeunen, Md. Danish Kalim
0
0
Emerging short-video platforms like TikTok, Instagram Reels, and ShareChat present unique challenges for recommender systems, primarily originating from a continuous stream of new content. ShareChat alone receives approximately 2 million pieces of fresh content daily, complicating efforts to assess quality, learn effective latent representations, and accurately match content with the appropriate user base, especially given limited user feedback. Embedding-based approaches are a popular choice for industrial recommender systems because they can learn low-dimensional representations of items, leading to effective recommendation that can easily scale to millions of items and users. Our work characterizes the evolution of such embeddings in short-video recommendation systems, comparing the effect of batch and real-time updates to content embeddings. We investigate emph{how} embeddings change with subsequent updates, explore the relationship between embeddings and popularity bias, and highlight their impact on user engagement metrics. Our study unveils the contrast in the number of interactions needed to achieve mature embeddings in a batch learning setup versus a real-time one, identifies the point of highest information updates, and explores the distribution of $ell_2$-norms across the two competing learning modes. Utilizing a production system deployed on a large-scale short-video app with over 180 million users, our findings offer insights into designing effective recommendation systems and enhancing user satisfaction and engagement in short-video applications.
5/29/2024