User Welfare Optimization in Recommender Systems with Competing Content Creators
2404.18319
0
0
š ļø
Abstract
Driven by the new economic opportunities created by the creator economy, an increasing number of content creators rely on and compete for revenue generated from online content recommendation platforms. This burgeoning competition reshapes the dynamics of content distribution and profoundly impacts long-term user welfare on the platform. However, the absence of a comprehensive picture of global user preference distribution often traps the competition, especially the creators, in states that yield sub-optimal user welfare. To encourage creators to best serve a broad user population with relevant content, it becomes the platform's responsibility to leverage its information advantage regarding user preference distribution to accurately signal creators. In this study, we perform system-side user welfare optimization under a competitive game setting among content creators. We propose an algorithmic solution for the platform, which dynamically computes a sequence of weights for each user based on their satisfaction of the recommended content. These weights are then utilized to design mechanisms that adjust the recommendation policy or the post-recommendation rewards, thereby influencing creators' content production strategies. To validate the effectiveness of our proposed method, we report our findings from a series of experiments, including: 1. a proof-of-concept negative example illustrating how creators' strategies converge towards sub-optimal states without platform intervention; 2. offline experiments employing our proposed intervention mechanisms on diverse datasets; and 3. results from a three-week online experiment conducted on a leading short-video recommendation platform.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The creator economy has led to increased competition among content creators for revenue from online recommendation platforms.
- This competition can impact long-term user welfare on the platform, as creators may focus on optimizing for the platform's recommendation algorithm rather than serving a broad user population.
- The platform can leverage its information advantage about user preferences to help creators produce more relevant content and improve user welfare.
Plain English Explanation
The rise of the creator economy has led more people to create and share content online. These content creators rely on and compete for revenue from platforms that recommend their content to users. As this competition increases, it can reshape how content is distributed and impact the long-term well-being of users on the platform.
The problem is that creators may get trapped in a state where they optimize their content solely for the platform's recommendation algorithm, rather than trying to serve a diverse set of users. This is because platforms often don't have a comprehensive understanding of user preferences, making it difficult for creators to know what content will truly resonate with a broad audience.
To address this, the platform can use its information advantage about user preferences to signal to creators what kind of content is likely to be most valuable to users. This can help guide creators to produce more relevant and engaging content, ultimately improving overall user satisfaction on the platform.
Technical Explanation
The researchers propose an algorithmic solution for the platform to optimize user welfare in a competitive game setting among content creators. The key steps are:
-
The platform dynamically computes a sequence of weights for each user based on their satisfaction with the recommended content. These weights reflect the platform's understanding of user preferences.
-
The platform then uses these weights to design mechanisms that adjust the recommendation policy or the post-recommendation rewards. This influences the content production strategies of the creators.
To validate their approach, the researchers conducted:
-
A proof-of-concept negative example illustrating how creators' strategies can converge towards sub-optimal states without platform intervention.
-
Offline experiments employing the proposed intervention mechanisms on diverse datasets.
-
A three-week online experiment on a leading short-video recommendation platform.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach for platforms to leverage their information advantage to improve user welfare in the face of increasing creator competition. However, the authors acknowledge that their solution relies on the platform's ability to accurately model user preferences, which can be challenging in practice.
Additionally, the research does not address potential concerns around platform power and control over creator content and the long-term implications of such interventions on the creator ecosystem.
Further research could explore methods to incentivize social information sharing among users, which could provide additional signals to help platforms better understand and serve diverse user preferences.
Conclusion
This study highlights the importance of platforms taking an active role in shaping content distribution and creator incentives to promote user welfare in the creator economy. By leveraging their information advantage about user preferences, platforms can design mechanisms to guide creators towards producing more relevant and engaging content for a broad audience. While the proposed solution has some limitations, it represents an important step towards addressing the challenges posed by increasing competition in the creator economy.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
šÆ
Incentivizing High-Quality Content in Online Recommender Systems
Xinyan Hu, Meena Jagadeesan, Michael I. Jordan, Jacob Steinhardt
0
0
In content recommender systems such as TikTok and YouTube, the platform's recommendation algorithm shapes content producer incentives. Many platforms employ online learning, which generates intertemporal incentives, since content produced today affects recommendations of future content. We study the game between producers and analyze the content created at equilibrium. We show that standard online learning algorithms, such as Hedge and EXP3, unfortunately incentivize producers to create low-quality content, where producers' effort approaches zero in the long run for typical learning rate schedules. Motivated by this negative result, we design learning algorithms that incentivize producers to invest high effort and achieve high user welfare. At a conceptual level, our work illustrates the unintended impact that a platform's learning algorithm can have on content quality and introduces algorithmic approaches to mitigating these effects.
6/24/2024
āļø
A Mechanism for Optimizing Media Recommender Systems
Brian McFadden
0
0
A mechanism is described that addresses the fundamental trade off between media producers who want to increase reach and consumers who provide attention based on the rate of utility received, and where overreach negatively impacts that rate. An optimal solution can be achieved when the media source considers the impact of overreach in a cost function used in determining the optimal distribution of content to maximize individual consumer utility and participation. The result is a Nash equilibrium between producer and consumer that is also Pareto efficient. Comparison with the literature on Recommender systems highlights the advantages of the mechanism.The review suggests advancements over that literature including identifying an optimal content volume for the consumer and improvements for handling multiple objectives A practical algorithm to generate the optimal distribution for each consumer is provided.
6/26/2024
Harm Mitigation in Recommender Systems under User Preference Dynamics
Jerry Chee, Shankar Kalyanaraman, Sindhu Kiranmai Ernala, Udi Weinsberg, Sarah Dean, Stratis Ioannidis
0
0
We consider a recommender system that takes into account the interplay between recommendations, the evolution of user interests, and harmful content. We model the impact of recommendations on user behavior, particularly the tendency to consume harmful content. We seek recommendation policies that establish a tradeoff between maximizing click-through rate (CTR) and mitigating harm. We establish conditions under which the user profile dynamics have a stationary point, and propose algorithms for finding an optimal recommendation policy at stationarity. We experiment on a semi-synthetic movie recommendation setting initialized with real data and observe that our policies outperform baselines at simultaneously maximizing CTR and mitigating harm.
6/17/2024
šæ
Incentive-Aware Recommender Systems in Two-Sided Markets
Xiaowu Dai, Wenlu Xu, Yuan Qi, Michael I. Jordan
0
0
Online platforms in the Internet Economy commonly incorporate recommender systems that recommend products (or arms) to users (or agents). A key challenge in this domain arises from myopic agents who are naturally incentivized to exploit by choosing the optimal arm based on current information, rather than exploring various alternatives to gather information that benefits the collective. We propose a novel recommender system that aligns with agents' incentives while achieving asymptotically optimal performance, as measured by regret in repeated interactions. Our framework models this incentive-aware system as a multi-agent bandit problem in two-sided markets, where the interactions of agents and arms are facilitated by recommender systems on online platforms. This model incorporates incentive constraints induced by agents' opportunity costs. In scenarios where opportunity costs are known to the platform, we show the existence of an incentive-compatible recommendation algorithm. This algorithm pools recommendations between a genuinely good arm and an unknown arm using a randomized and adaptive strategy. Moreover, when these opportunity costs are unknown, we introduce an algorithm that randomly pools recommendations across all arms, utilizing the cumulative loss from each arm as feedback for strategic exploration. We demonstrate that both algorithms satisfy an ex-post fairness criterion, which protects agents from over-exploitation. All code for using the proposed algorithms and reproducing results is made available on GitHub.
6/19/2024