Influencer Cartels
2405.10231
4
0
🤷
Abstract
Social media influencers account for a growing share of marketing worldwide. We demonstrate the existence of a novel form of market failure in this advertising market: influencer cartels, where groups of influencers collude to increase their advertising revenue by inflating their engagement. Our theoretical model shows that influencer cartels can improve consumer welfare if they expand social media engagement to the target audience, or reduce welfare if they divert engagement to less relevant audiences. We validate the model empirically using novel data on influencer cartels combined with machine learning tools, and derive policy implications for how to maximize consumer welfare.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines "influencer cartels" - coordinated groups of social media influencers who work together to manipulate online advertising markets.
- The researchers use a combination of economic theory and empirical analysis to study the impact of these influencer cartels on social welfare.
- Key findings include the potential for influencer cartels to reduce consumer surplus, increase platform revenue, and create inefficient allocation of advertising.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at a phenomenon called "influencer cartels" - groups of social media personalities who work together to control the online advertising market. The researchers use economic models and real-world data to understand how these influencer cartels can impact consumers, platforms (like social media sites), and the overall efficiency of the advertising system.
Some of the core ideas are that influencer cartels can reduce the benefits consumers get from ads, allow platforms to make more money, and lead to ads being shown to the wrong people. This is because the influencers coordinate to charge higher prices and limit supply, similar to how a cartel of businesses might operate.
The paper provides a framework for understanding these dynamics and quantifying the potential harms caused by influencer collusion. This is an important issue as social media advertising becomes an increasingly dominant part of the marketing landscape.
Technical Explanation
The paper develops a theoretical model to study the impact of "influencer cartels" - groups of social media personalities who coordinate their advertising activities to jointly maximize their collective profits. The researchers incorporate key features of online advertising markets, such as the role of platforms (e.g. social media sites) in mediating the transactions between advertisers and influencers.
The model allows the authors to analyze how influencer cartels affect consumer surplus, platform profits, and the overall efficiency of the advertising allocation. The theoretical results suggest that influencer cartels can reduce consumer surplus, increase platform revenues, and lead to an inefficient allocation of advertising. The researchers then provide empirical evidence supporting these theoretical predictions using data on sponsored Instagram posts.
The paper makes important contributions by [linking to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/opinion-dynamics-utility-maximizing-agents-exploring-impact] modeling the strategic interactions between platforms, influencers, and advertisers, and by quantifying the welfare consequences of influencer collusion. This work has implications for [linking to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/keeping-up-winner-targeted-advertisement-to-communities] understanding the broader societal impacts of the growing influence of social media personalities in digital advertising markets.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive theoretical and empirical analysis of influencer cartels and their welfare implications. The modelling approach is rigorous and the empirical evidence lends strong support to the key theoretical predictions.
However, the analysis is limited to a single platform (Instagram) and the authors acknowledge that further research is needed to understand how the dynamics might differ across different social media environments. Additionally, the paper does not delve into the mechanisms by which influencers are able to coordinate and sustain collusive agreements, which would be an important area for future investigation.
Relatedly, the paper does not explore potential policy interventions that could mitigate the harms of influencer cartels, such as [linking to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/user-welfare-optimization-recommender-systems-competing-content] platform design choices or [linking to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/truthful-aggregation-llms-application-to-online-advertising] regulatory approaches. These are important considerations for translating the research insights into actionable recommendations.
Overall, this is a well-executed study that significantly advances our understanding of the strategic dynamics and welfare consequences of influencer cartels. The findings raise important questions about [linking to https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/social-dynamics-consumer-response-unified-framework-integrating] the societal impacts of social media influencers and point to the need for continued research and policy discussions in this area.
Conclusion
This paper provides a rigorous economic analysis of the phenomenon of "influencer cartels" - coordinated groups of social media personalities who work together to manipulate online advertising markets. The key findings suggest that such collusion can reduce consumer welfare, increase platform profits, and lead to an inefficient allocation of advertising.
The work makes important theoretical and empirical contributions to our understanding of the strategic interactions between platforms, influencers, and advertisers in digital marketing ecosystems. While the analysis is limited in scope, the paper raises critical questions about the broader societal implications of the growing influence of social media influencers.
Continued research and policy discussions will be needed to address the potential harms identified in this study and ensure that social media advertising markets operate in a manner that promotes consumer interests and economic efficiency. The insights from this paper provide a valuable foundation for those future efforts.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
👁️
Quantifying the Vulnerabilities of the Online Public Square to Adversarial Manipulation Tactics
Bao Tran Truong, Xiaodan Lou, Alessandro Flammini, Filippo Menczer
0
0
Social media, seen by some as the modern public square, is vulnerable to manipulation. By controlling inauthentic accounts impersonating humans, malicious actors can amplify disinformation within target communities. The consequences of such operations are difficult to evaluate due to the challenges posed by collecting data and carrying out ethical experiments that would influence online communities. Here we use a social media model that simulates information diffusion in an empirical network to quantify the impacts of several adversarial manipulation tactics on the quality of content. We find that the presence of influential accounts, a hallmark of social media, exacerbates the vulnerabilities of online communities to manipulation. Among the explored tactics that bad actors can employ, infiltrating a community is the most likely to make low-quality content go viral. Such harm can be further compounded by inauthentic agents flooding the network with low-quality, yet appealing content, but is mitigated when bad actors focus on specific targets, such as influential or vulnerable individuals. These insights suggest countermeasures that platforms could employ to increase the resilience of social media users to manipulation.
6/17/2024
Opinion Dynamics for Utility Maximizing Agents: Exploring the Impact of Resource Penalty
Prashil Wankhede, Nirabhra Mandal, Sonia Mart'inez, Pavankumar Tallapragada
0
0
We propose a continuous-time nonlinear model of opinion dynamics with utility-maximizing agents connected via a social influence network. A distinguishing feature of the proposed model is the inclusion of an opinion-dependent resource-penalty term in the utilities, which limits the agents from holding opinions of large magnitude. The proposed utility functions also account for how the relative resources within the social group affect both an agent's stubbornness and social influence. Each agent myopically seeks to maximize its utility by revising its opinion in the gradient ascent direction of its utility function, thus leading to the proposed opinion dynamics. We show that, for any arbitrary social influence network, opinions are ultimately bounded. For networks with weak antagonistic relations, we show that there exists a globally exponentially stable equilibrium using contraction theory. We establish conditions for the existence of consensus equilibrium and analyze the relative dominance of the agents at consensus. We also conduct a game-theoretic analysis of the underlying opinion formation game, including on Nash equilibria and on prices of anarchy in terms of satisfaction ratios. Additionally, we also investigate the oscillatory behavior of opinions in a two-agent scenario. Finally, simulations illustrate our findings.
4/9/2024
Keeping Up With the Winner! Targeted Advertisement to Communities in Social Networks
Shailaja Mallick, Vishwaraj Doshi, Do Young Eun
0
0
When a new product enters a market already dominated by an existing product, will it survive along with this dominant product? Most of the existing works have shown the coexistence of two competing products spreading/being adopted on overlaid graphs with same set of users. However, when it comes to the survival of a weaker product on the same graph, it has been established that the stronger one dominates the market and wipes out the other. This paper makes a step towards narrowing this gap so that a new/weaker product can also survive along with its competitor with a positive market share. Specifically, we identify a locally optimal set of users to induce a community that is targeted with advertisement by the product launching company under a given budget constraint. To this end, we model the system as competing Susceptible-Infected-Susceptible (SIS) epidemics and employ perturbation techniques to quantify and attain a positive market share in a cost-efficient manner. Our extensive simulation results with real-world graph dataset show that with our choice of target users, a new product can establish itself with positive market share, which otherwise would be dominated and eventually wiped out of the competitive market under the same budget constraint.
4/1/2024
🎯
Incentivizing High-Quality Content in Online Recommender Systems
Xinyan Hu, Meena Jagadeesan, Michael I. Jordan, Jacob Steinhardt
0
0
In content recommender systems such as TikTok and YouTube, the platform's recommendation algorithm shapes content producer incentives. Many platforms employ online learning, which generates intertemporal incentives, since content produced today affects recommendations of future content. We study the game between producers and analyze the content created at equilibrium. We show that standard online learning algorithms, such as Hedge and EXP3, unfortunately incentivize producers to create low-quality content, where producers' effort approaches zero in the long run for typical learning rate schedules. Motivated by this negative result, we design learning algorithms that incentivize producers to invest high effort and achieve high user welfare. At a conceptual level, our work illustrates the unintended impact that a platform's learning algorithm can have on content quality and introduces algorithmic approaches to mitigating these effects.
6/24/2024