Opinion Dynamics for Utility Maximizing Agents: Exploring the Impact of Resource Penalty
2404.04912
0
0
Abstract
We propose a continuous-time nonlinear model of opinion dynamics with utility-maximizing agents connected via a social influence network. A distinguishing feature of the proposed model is the inclusion of an opinion-dependent resource-penalty term in the utilities, which limits the agents from holding opinions of large magnitude. The proposed utility functions also account for how the relative resources within the social group affect both an agent's stubbornness and social influence. Each agent myopically seeks to maximize its utility by revising its opinion in the gradient ascent direction of its utility function, thus leading to the proposed opinion dynamics. We show that, for any arbitrary social influence network, opinions are ultimately bounded. For networks with weak antagonistic relations, we show that there exists a globally exponentially stable equilibrium using contraction theory. We establish conditions for the existence of consensus equilibrium and analyze the relative dominance of the agents at consensus. We also conduct a game-theoretic analysis of the underlying opinion formation game, including on Nash equilibria and on prices of anarchy in terms of satisfaction ratios. Additionally, we also investigate the oscillatory behavior of opinions in a two-agent scenario. Finally, simulations illustrate our findings.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the dynamics of opinion formation among utility-maximizing agents, with a focus on the impact of resource penalties.
- The researchers develop a model to analyze how agents' opinions evolve over time, taking into account their desire to maximize utility and the potential penalties they face for resource consumption.
- The study investigates how different penalty structures and network topologies affect the convergence of opinions and the overall efficiency of resource usage.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how people's opinions change over time, especially when they are trying to get the most benefit for themselves. The researchers created a model to understand this process, including what happens when people face penalties for using too many resources.
The key idea is that people don't just blindly follow the opinions of others - they also try to maximize their own benefit or "utility." This means they have to balance their desire to agree with their peers with the need to avoid resource penalties. The study explores how different penalty structures and the way people are connected in a network can influence how opinions converge (or don't converge) over time.
For example, imagine a group of friends deciding where to go on vacation. They might be influenced by each other's opinions, but they also have to consider factors like the cost and environmental impact of the trip. The way these different priorities play out can lead to interesting dynamics in how the group's consensus emerges (or doesn't).
By understanding these complex opinion dynamics, the researchers hope to provide insights that could inform the design of policies, incentives, and social systems to promote more efficient and sustainable resource use.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a model of opinion dynamics for a population of utility-maximizing agents connected in a social network. Each agent has an opinion that they can update based on the opinions of their neighbors, as well as their own desire to maximize their utility.
The key innovation is the incorporation of a resource penalty function, which penalizes agents for exceeding a certain level of resource consumption. This resource penalty acts as a constraint on the agents' utility maximization, leading to interesting dynamics in how opinions evolve over time.
The researchers analyze the convergence properties of the opinion dynamics under different network topologies and penalty structures. They show that the presence of resource penalties can significantly impact the long-term distribution of opinions, leading to more efficient use of resources compared to a scenario without penalties.
The paper also explores how the network structure, such as the degree distribution and modularity, interacts with the penalty function to influence the final opinion distribution and resource usage. The researchers provide theoretical and numerical results to characterize these relationships.
These findings contribute to a broader understanding of link to "Temporal Dynamics of Group Interactions in Higher-Order Social Networks" and link to "Social Dynamics and Consumer Response: A Unified Framework Integrating Individual and Social Dynamics" in opinion formation, as well as the design of link to "Socially Optimal Energy Usage via Adaptive Pricing" and link to "Online Optimization for Randomized Network Resource Allocation" mechanisms to promote more sustainable resource usage.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful and well-designed model for studying opinion dynamics in the presence of resource constraints. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research that could be explored:
-
The model assumes that agents have perfect information about the resource penalty function and their neighbors' opinions. In reality, agents may have incomplete or noisy information, which could lead to different opinion dynamics.
-
The paper focuses on the long-term convergence of opinions, but it would be interesting to also understand the transient behavior and the speed of convergence under different conditions.
-
The analysis is limited to a single type of resource penalty function. Exploring other functional forms, or even allowing the penalty function to be endogenously determined, could provide additional insights.
-
While the paper considers different network topologies, it would be valuable to also investigate how opinion dynamics might be influenced by the co-evolution of the social network and individual opinions, as suggested by link to "Robust Constrained Consensus in Inequality Constrained Distributed Optimization".
Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of opinion dynamics and resource usage, but further research could expand on the model's assumptions and explore additional aspects of this complex problem.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel model of opinion dynamics that incorporates the impact of resource penalties on the utility-maximizing behavior of agents. The study provides important insights into how the interplay between social influence and individual incentives can shape the long-term distribution of opinions and the efficiency of resource usage.
The findings have potential applications in the design of policies, incentives, and social systems to promote more sustainable resource consumption, as well as a broader understanding of the complex dynamics underlying opinion formation and evolution in social networks. By continuing to explore these topics, researchers can contribute to the development of more effective strategies for addressing pressing societal challenges.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🎯
Asynchronous Opinion Dynamics in Social Networks
Petra Berenbrink, Martin Hoefer, Dominik Kaaser, Pascal Lenzner, Malin Rau, Daniel Schmand
0
0
Opinion spreading in a society decides the fate of elections, the success of products, and the impact of political or social movements. The model by Hegselmann and Krause is a well-known theoretical model to study such opinion formation processes in social networks. In contrast to many other theoretical models, it does not converge towards a situation where all agents agree on the same opinion. Instead, it assumes that people find an opinion reasonable if and only if it is close to their own. The system converges towards a stable situation where agents sharing the same opinion form a cluster, and agents in different clusters do not mbox{influence each other.} We focus on the social variant of the Hegselmann-Krause model where agents are connected by a social network and their opinions evolve in an iterative process. When activated, an agent adopts the average of the opinions of its neighbors having a similar opinion. By this, the set of influencing neighbors of an agent may change over time. To the best of our knowledge, social Hegselmann-Krause systems with asynchronous opinion updates have only been studied with the complete graph as social network. We show that such opinion dynamics with random agent activation are guaranteed to converge for any social network. We provide an upper bound of $mathcal{O}(n|E|^2 (varepsilon/delta)^2)$ on the expected number of opinion updates until convergence, where $|E|$ is the number of edges of the social network. For the complete social network we show a bound of $mathcal{O}(n^3(n^2 + (varepsilon/delta)^2))$ that represents a major improvement over the previously best upper bound of $mathcal{O}(n^9 (varepsilon/delta)^2)$. Our bounds are complemented by simulations that indicate asymptotically matching lower bounds.
4/16/2024
💬
On the Principles behind Opinion Dynamics in Multi-Agent Systems of Large Language Models
Pedro Cisneros-Velarde
0
0
We study the evolution of opinions inside a population of interacting large language models (LLMs). Every LLM needs to decide how much funding to allocate to an item with three initial possibilities: full, partial, or no funding. We identify biases that drive the exchange of opinions based on the LLM's tendency to (i) find consensus with the other LLM's opinion, (ii) display caution when specifying funding, and (iii) consider ethical concerns in its opinion. We find these biases are affected by the perceived absence of compelling reasons for opinion change, the perceived willingness to engage in discussion, and the distribution of allocation values. Moreover, tensions among biases can lead to the survival of funding for items with negative connotations. We also find that the final distribution of full, partial, and no funding opinions is more diverse when an LLM freely forms its opinion after an interaction than when its opinion is a multiple-choice selection among the three allocation options. In the latter case, consensus or polarization is generally attained. When agents are aware of past opinions, they seek to maintain consistency with them, and more diverse updating rules emerge. Our study is performed using a Llama 3 LLM.
6/26/2024
🔗
Undecided State Dynamics with Stubborn Agents
Petra Berenbrink, Felix Biermeier, Christopher Hahn
0
0
In the classical Approximate Majority problem with two opinions there are agents with Opinion 1 and with Opinion 2. The goal is to reach consensus and to agree on the majority opinion if the bias is sufficiently large. It is well known that the problem can be solved efficiently using the Undecided State Dynamics (USD) where an agent interacting with an agent of the opposite opinion becomes undecided. In this paper, we consider a variant of the USD with a preferred Opinion 1. That is, agents with Opinion 1 behave stubbornly -- they preserve their opinion with probability $p$ whenever they interact with an agent having Opinion 2. Our main result shows a phase transition around the stubbornness parameter $p approx 1-x_1/x_2$. If $x_1 = Theta(n)$ and $p geq 1-x_1/x_2 + o(1)$, then all agents agree on Opinion 1 after $O(ncdot log n)$ interactions. On the other hand, for $p leq 1-x_1/x_2 - o(1)$, all agents agree on Opinion 2, again after $O(ncdot log n)$ interactions. Finally, if $p approx 1-x_1/x_2$, then all agents do agree on one opinion after $O(ncdot log^2 n)$ interactions, but either of the two opinions can survive. All our results hold with high probability.
6/13/2024
🔎
Perspective in Opinion Dynamics on Complex Convex Domains of Time Networks for Addiction, Forgetting
Yasuko Kawahata
0
0
This paper revises previous work and introduces changes in spatio-temporal scales. The paper presents a model that includes layers A and B with varying degrees of forgetting and dependence over time. We also model changes in dependence and forgetting in layers A, A', B, and B' under certain conditions. In addition, to discuss the formation of opinion clusters that have reinforcing or obstructive behaviors of forgetting and dependence and are conservative or brainwashing or detoxifying and less prone to filter bubbling, new clusters C and D that recommend, obstruct, block, or incite forgetting and dependence over time are Introduction. This introduction allows us to test hypotheses regarding the expansion of opinions in two dimensions over time and space, the state of development of opinion space, and the expansion of public opinion. Challenges in consensus building will be highlighted, emphasizing the dynamic nature of opinions and the need to consider factors such as dissent, distrust, and media influence. The paper proposes an extended framework that incorporates trust, distrust, and media influence into the consensus building model. We introduce network analysis using dimerizing as a method to gain deeper insights. In this context, we discuss network clustering, media influence, and consensus building. The location and distribution of dimers will be analyzed to gain insight into the structure and dynamics of the network. Dimertiling has been applied in various fields other than network analysis, such as physics and sociology. The paper concludes by emphasizing the importance of diverse perspectives, network analysis, and influential entities in consensus building. It also introduces torus-based visualizations that aid in understanding complex network structures.
4/26/2024