Information-theoretic generalization bounds for learning from quantum data
2311.05529
0
0
📊
Abstract
Learning tasks play an increasingly prominent role in quantum information and computation. They range from fundamental problems such as state discrimination and metrology over the framework of quantum probably approximately correct (PAC) learning, to the recently proposed shadow variants of state tomography. However, the many directions of quantum learning theory have so far evolved separately. We propose a general mathematical formalism for describing quantum learning by training on classical-quantum data and then testing how well the learned hypothesis generalizes to new data. In this framework, we prove bounds on the expected generalization error of a quantum learner in terms of classical and quantum information-theoretic quantities measuring how strongly the learner's hypothesis depends on the specific data seen during training. To achieve this, we use tools from quantum optimal transport and quantum concentration inequalities to establish non-commutative versions of decoupling lemmas that underlie recent information-theoretic generalization bounds for classical machine learning. Our framework encompasses and gives intuitively accessible generalization bounds for a variety of quantum learning scenarios such as quantum state discrimination, PAC learning quantum states, quantum parameter estimation, and quantumly PAC learning classical functions. Thereby, our work lays a foundation for a unifying quantum information-theoretic perspective on quantum learning.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a general mathematical framework for describing quantum learning, where a quantum learner is trained on classical-quantum data and then tested on how well the learned hypothesis generalizes to new data.
- The researchers use tools from quantum optimal transport and quantum concentration inequalities to establish non-commutative versions of decoupling lemmas that underlie recent information-theoretic generalization bounds for classical machine learning.
- The framework encompasses and provides generalization bounds for a variety of quantum learning scenarios, including quantum state discrimination, PAC learning quantum states, quantum parameter estimation, and quantumly PAC learning classical functions.
Plain English Explanation
Learning is becoming increasingly important in the field of quantum information and computation. Quantum learning tasks range from fundamental problems like distinguishing different quantum states (quantum state discrimination) to more complex frameworks like quantum probably approximately correct (PAC) learning, where a quantum learner tries to learn a general pattern from specific data samples.
However, these different areas of quantum learning theory have mostly evolved separately. The researchers in this paper propose a unified mathematical framework to describe how quantum learners can learn from classical-quantum data (a combination of classical information and quantum information) and then use that learning to make predictions on new data.
To do this, the researchers use advanced mathematical tools from quantum information theory, including quantum optimal transport and quantum concentration inequalities. These tools allow them to establish mathematical bounds on how well the quantum learner's predictions will generalize to new data, based on properties of the training data and the quantum learner's model.
This unified framework covers a wide range of quantum learning scenarios, from quantum parameter estimation to quantumly learning classical functions. By providing a common mathematical language, the researchers hope to help bring together the disparate areas of quantum learning theory and work towards a more comprehensive understanding of how quantum systems can be used for learning tasks.
Technical Explanation
The key contribution of this paper is the development of a general mathematical framework for describing quantum learning. In this framework, a quantum learner is trained on a dataset of classical-quantum data, which consists of classical information paired with quantum information (such as the state of a quantum system).
The researchers use tools from quantum optimal transport and quantum concentration inequalities to establish non-commutative versions of "decoupling lemmas" - mathematical results that underlie recent advances in information-theoretic generalization bounds for classical machine learning.
These quantum decoupling lemmas allow the researchers to prove bounds on the expected generalization error of a quantum learner. In other words, they can quantify how well the learner's predictions on new data will match the true underlying pattern, based on properties of the training data and the learner's model.
The framework encompasses a variety of quantum learning scenarios, including:
- Quantum state discrimination: Distinguishing between different quantum states
- PAC learning quantum states: Learning a general pattern from specific quantum state samples
- Quantum parameter estimation: Estimating the parameters of a quantum system
- Quantumly PAC learning classical functions: Using a quantum system to learn a general pattern from classical data samples
By providing a unified mathematical framework, the researchers hope to help bridge the gaps between the disparate areas of quantum learning theory and work towards a more comprehensive understanding of how quantum systems can be used for learning tasks.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several caveats and limitations of their work. First, the generalization bounds they derive are essentially worst-case bounds, meaning they hold for any possible data distribution or learning algorithm. While this provides a strong theoretical foundation, the bounds may not be tight enough to be directly applicable to real-world quantum learning problems.
Additionally, the researchers focus on establishing general principles and mathematical tools, rather than optimizing the bounds for specific quantum learning scenarios. Further research would be needed to refine the bounds and make them more practically useful for particular applications.
The paper also does not address the computational complexity of implementing the quantum learning algorithms or the experimental feasibility of preparing the required classical-quantum data. These are important practical considerations that would need to be addressed for the framework to be widely adopted.
That said, the researchers have made an important contribution by unifying the disparate areas of quantum learning theory under a common mathematical language. This lays the groundwork for a more comprehensive understanding of quantum learning and could inspire further research to address the remaining challenges.
Conclusion
This paper proposes a general mathematical framework for describing quantum learning, where a quantum learner is trained on classical-quantum data and then tested on how well the learned hypothesis generalizes to new data. The researchers use advanced tools from quantum information theory to establish non-commutative versions of decoupling lemmas, which allow them to prove bounds on the expected generalization error of a quantum learner.
The framework encompasses a variety of quantum learning scenarios, from quantum state discrimination to quantumly learning classical functions. By providing a unified mathematical language, the researchers hope to help bridge the gaps between the different areas of quantum learning theory and work towards a more comprehensive understanding of how quantum systems can be used for learning tasks.
While the generalization bounds derived in the paper may not be directly applicable to real-world problems, the research represents an important step forward in the theoretical foundations of quantum learning. Further work is needed to refine the bounds and address practical considerations, but this paper lays the groundwork for a more unified and insightful perspective on the emerging field of quantum learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
⛏️
Generalization with data-dependent quantum geometry
Tobias Haug, M. S. Kim
0
0
Generalization is the ability of machine learning models to make accurate predictions on new data by learning from training data. However, understanding generalization of quantum machine learning models has been a major challenge. Here, we introduce the data quantum Fisher information metric (DQFIM). It describes the capacity of variational quantum algorithms depending on variational ansatz, training data and their symmetries. We apply the DQFIM to quantify circuit parameters and training data needed to successfully train and generalize. Using the dynamical Lie algebra, we explain how to generalize using a low number of training states. Counter-intuitively, breaking symmetries of the training data can help to improve generalization. Finally, we find that out-of-distribution generalization, where training and testing data are drawn from different data distributions, can be better than using the same distribution. Our work provides a useful framework to explore the power of quantum machine learning models.
5/14/2024
🔗
Statistical Complexity of Quantum Learning
Leonardo Banchi, Jason Luke Pereira, Sharu Theresa Jose, Osvaldo Simeone
0
0
Recent years have seen significant activity on the problem of using data for the purpose of learning properties of quantum systems or of processing classical or quantum data via quantum computing. As in classical learning, quantum learning problems involve settings in which the mechanism generating the data is unknown, and the main goal of a learning algorithm is to ensure satisfactory accuracy levels when only given access to data and, possibly, side information such as expert knowledge. This article reviews the complexity of quantum learning using information-theoretic techniques by focusing on data complexity, copy complexity, and model complexity. Copy complexity arises from the destructive nature of quantum measurements, which irreversibly alter the state to be processed, limiting the information that can be extracted about quantum data. For example, in a quantum system, unlike in classical machine learning, it is generally not possible to evaluate the training loss simultaneously on multiple hypotheses using the same quantum data. To make the paper self-contained and approachable by different research communities, we provide extensive background material on classical results from statistical learning theory, as well as on the distinguishability of quantum states. Throughout, we highlight the differences between quantum and classical learning by addressing both supervised and unsupervised learning, and we provide extensive pointers to the literature.
4/17/2024
👨🏫
Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for Transductive Learning and its Applications
Huayi Tang, Yong Liu
0
0
We develop generalization bounds for transductive learning algorithms in the context of information theory and PAC-Bayesian theory, covering both the random sampling setting and the random splitting setting. We show that the transductive generalization gap can be bounded by the mutual information between training labels selection and the hypothesis. By introducing the concept of transductive supersamples, we translate results depicted by various information measures from the inductive learning setting to the transductive learning setting. We further establish PAC-Bayesian bounds with weaker assumptions on the loss function and numbers of training and test data points. Finally, we present the upper bounds for adaptive optimization algorithms and demonstrate the applications of results on semi-supervised learning and graph learning scenarios. Our theoretic results are validated on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
6/11/2024
Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for Deep Neural Networks
Haiyun He, Christina Lee Yu, Ziv Goldfeld
0
0
Deep neural networks (DNNs) exhibit an exceptional capacity for generalization in practical applications. This work aims to capture the effect and benefits of depth for supervised learning via information-theoretic generalization bounds. We first derive two hierarchical bounds on the generalization error in terms of the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence or the 1-Wasserstein distance between the train and test distributions of the network internal representations. The KL divergence bound shrinks as the layer index increases, while the Wasserstein bound implies the existence of a layer that serves as a generalization funnel, which attains a minimal 1-Wasserstein distance. Analytic expressions for both bounds are derived under the setting of binary Gaussian classification with linear DNNs. To quantify the contraction of the relevant information measures when moving deeper into the network, we analyze the strong data processing inequality (SDPI) coefficient between consecutive layers of three regularized DNN models: Dropout, DropConnect, and Gaussian noise injection. This enables refining our generalization bounds to capture the contraction as a function of the network architecture parameters. Specializing our results to DNNs with a finite parameter space and the Gibbs algorithm reveals that deeper yet narrower network architectures generalize better in those examples, although how broadly this statement applies remains a question.
4/5/2024