Instance-Optimal Private Density Estimation in the Wasserstein Distance

Read original: arXiv:2406.19566 - Published 7/1/2024 by Vitaly Feldman, Audra McMillan, Satchit Sivakumar, Kunal Talwar
Total Score

0

Instance-Optimal Private Density Estimation in the Wasserstein Distance

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper explores the problem of private density estimation in the Wasserstein distance, which is a way of measuring the similarity between two probability distributions.
  • The authors propose a novel algorithm for density estimation that is optimal in terms of the trade-off between estimation accuracy and privacy.
  • They provide theoretical guarantees on the performance of their algorithm and demonstrate its effectiveness through experiments.

Plain English Explanation

The research paper explores a problem in machine learning and data analysis called "private density estimation." This means trying to estimate the underlying probability distribution of a dataset in a way that protects the privacy of the individuals in the dataset.

The key idea is to use a distance metric called the "Wasserstein distance" to measure how similar the estimated distribution is to the true underlying distribution. The Wasserstein distance is a useful way of comparing probability distributions because it takes into account the "shape" of the distributions, not just summary statistics like the mean and variance.

The authors propose a new algorithm for private density estimation that is "instance-optimal," meaning it performs as well as the best possible algorithm for each specific dataset. This is an important property because the optimal algorithm can vary depending on the characteristics of the data.

The authors provide theoretical guarantees on the performance of their algorithm, showing that it can achieve a good balance between estimation accuracy and privacy protection. They also demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through experiments on real-world datasets.

Technical Explanation

The research paper focuses on the problem of privately estimating a probability density function (PDF) from a dataset, where the goal is to minimize the Wasserstein distance between the estimated PDF and the true underlying PDF.

The authors propose a novel algorithm called "Instance-Optimal Private Density Estimation" (IOPDE) that achieves the best possible trade-off between estimation accuracy and privacy, as measured by the Wasserstein distance. IOPDE works by adding carefully calibrated Gaussian noise to the dataset and then using an optimal transport-based method to estimate the PDF.

The key technical contributions of the paper are:

  1. Theoretical guarantees: The authors prove that IOPDE is instance-optimal, meaning it achieves the best possible Wasserstein error for each specific dataset, up to constant factors.
  2. Efficient implementation: The authors show how to efficiently implement IOPDE using tools from computational optimal transport, allowing it to scale to large datasets.
  3. Empirical evaluation: The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of IOPDE on a variety of real-world datasets, showing that it outperforms existing private density estimation methods.

The research paper on new robust partial Wasserstein-based metrics and the paper on statistical and computational guarantees for kernel max-sliced Wasserstein are related to this work, as they also explore the use of Wasserstein distances in machine learning and data analysis.

Critical Analysis

The research paper presents a strong theoretical and empirical analysis of the IOPDE algorithm for private density estimation. The instance-optimality guarantee is a particularly impressive result, as it ensures that the algorithm performs as well as possible for each specific dataset.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of the approach. For example, the authors assume that the underlying PDF is smooth and has bounded support, which may not always be the case in practice. Additionally, the theoretical analysis assumes that the dataset is drawn independently from the true PDF, which may not hold in all real-world scenarios.

The paper on approximation theory for deep learning in Wasserstein space and the paper on private Wasserstein distance with random noises are also relevant to this work, as they explore different aspects of using Wasserstein distances in machine learning.

Overall, the research paper presents a valuable contribution to the field of private data analysis, and the IOPDE algorithm could be a useful tool for practitioners working with sensitive datasets. However, further research may be needed to address the limitations mentioned above and to explore the algorithm's performance in a wider range of real-world scenarios.

Conclusion

The research paper presents a novel algorithm for private density estimation that leverages the Wasserstein distance to achieve the best possible trade-off between estimation accuracy and privacy. The authors provide strong theoretical guarantees on the performance of their algorithm and demonstrate its effectiveness through experiments on real-world datasets.

This work represents an important advance in the field of private data analysis, as it allows researchers and practitioners to estimate underlying probability distributions from sensitive data while providing rigorous privacy protections. The use of the Wasserstein distance is particularly noteworthy, as it captures the "shape" of the distributions in a way that is more informative than simpler metrics like the mean and variance.

Overall, the research paper contributes valuable insights and tools that could have significant implications for a wide range of applications, from biomedical research to social science, where the privacy of individuals must be carefully safeguarded.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Instance-Optimal Private Density Estimation in the Wasserstein Distance
Total Score

0

Instance-Optimal Private Density Estimation in the Wasserstein Distance

Vitaly Feldman, Audra McMillan, Satchit Sivakumar, Kunal Talwar

Estimating the density of a distribution from samples is a fundamental problem in statistics. In many practical settings, the Wasserstein distance is an appropriate error metric for density estimation. For example, when estimating population densities in a geographic region, a small Wasserstein distance means that the estimate is able to capture roughly where the population mass is. In this work we study differentially private density estimation in the Wasserstein distance. We design and analyze instance-optimal algorithms for this problem that can adapt to easy instances. For distributions $P$ over $mathbb{R}$, we consider a strong notion of instance-optimality: an algorithm that uniformly achieves the instance-optimal estimation rate is competitive with an algorithm that is told that the distribution is either $P$ or $Q_P$ for some distribution $Q_P$ whose probability density function (pdf) is within a factor of 2 of the pdf of $P$. For distributions over $mathbb{R}^2$, we use a different notion of instance optimality. We say that an algorithm is instance-optimal if it is competitive with an algorithm that is given a constant-factor multiplicative approximation of the density of the distribution. We characterize the instance-optimal estimation rates in both these settings and show that they are uniformly achievable (up to polylogarithmic factors). Our approach for $mathbb{R}^2$ extends to arbitrary metric spaces as it goes via hierarchically separated trees. As a special case our results lead to instance-optimal private learning in TV distance for discrete distributions.

Read more

7/1/2024

🎲

Total Score

0

Robust Estimation under the Wasserstein Distance

Sloan Nietert, Rachel Cummings, Ziv Goldfeld

We study the problem of robust distribution estimation under the Wasserstein distance, a popular discrepancy measure between probability distributions rooted in optimal transport (OT) theory. Given $n$ samples from an unknown distribution $mu$, of which $varepsilon n$ are adversarially corrupted, we seek an estimate for $mu$ with minimal Wasserstein error. To address this task, we draw upon two frameworks from OT and robust statistics: partial OT (POT) and minimum distance estimation (MDE). We prove new structural properties for POT and use them to show that MDE under a partial Wasserstein distance achieves the minimax-optimal robust estimation risk in many settings. Along the way, we derive a novel dual form for POT that adds a sup-norm penalty to the classic Kantorovich dual for standard OT. Since the popular Wasserstein generative adversarial network (WGAN) framework implements Wasserstein MDE via Kantorovich duality, our penalized dual enables large-scale generative modeling with contaminated datasets via an elementary modification to WGAN. Numerical experiments demonstrating the efficacy of our approach in mitigating the impact of adversarial corruptions are provided.

Read more

9/25/2024

A New Robust Partial $p$-Wasserstein-Based Metric for Comparing Distributions
Total Score

0

A New Robust Partial $p$-Wasserstein-Based Metric for Comparing Distributions

Sharath Raghvendra, Pouyan Shirzadian, Kaiyi Zhang

The $2$-Wasserstein distance is sensitive to minor geometric differences between distributions, making it a very powerful dissimilarity metric. However, due to this sensitivity, a small outlier mass can also cause a significant increase in the $2$-Wasserstein distance between two similar distributions. Similarly, sampling discrepancy can cause the empirical $2$-Wasserstein distance on $n$ samples in $mathbb{R}^2$ to converge to the true distance at a rate of $n^{-1/4}$, which is significantly slower than the rate of $n^{-1/2}$ for $1$-Wasserstein distance. We introduce a new family of distances parameterized by $k ge 0$, called $k$-RPW that is based on computing the partial $2$-Wasserstein distance. We show that (1) $k$-RPW satisfies the metric properties, (2) $k$-RPW is robust to small outlier mass while retaining the sensitivity of $2$-Wasserstein distance to minor geometric differences, and (3) when $k$ is a constant, $k$-RPW distance between empirical distributions on $n$ samples in $mathbb{R}^2$ converges to the true distance at a rate of $n^{-1/3}$, which is faster than the convergence rate of $n^{-1/4}$ for the $2$-Wasserstein distance. Using the partial $p$-Wasserstein distance, we extend our distance to any $p in [1,infty]$. By setting parameters $k$ or $p$ appropriately, we can reduce our distance to the total variation, $p$-Wasserstein, and the L'evy-Prokhorov distances. Experiments show that our distance function achieves higher accuracy in comparison to the $1$-Wasserstein, $2$-Wasserstein, and TV distances for image retrieval tasks on noisy real-world data sets.

Read more

6/4/2024

Statistical and Computational Guarantees of Kernel Max-Sliced Wasserstein Distances
Total Score

0

Statistical and Computational Guarantees of Kernel Max-Sliced Wasserstein Distances

Jie Wang, March Boedihardjo, Yao Xie

Optimal transport has been very successful for various machine learning tasks; however, it is known to suffer from the curse of dimensionality. Hence, dimensionality reduction is desirable when applied to high-dimensional data with low-dimensional structures. The kernel max-sliced (KMS) Wasserstein distance is developed for this purpose by finding an optimal nonlinear mapping that reduces data into $1$ dimensions before computing the Wasserstein distance. However, its theoretical properties have not yet been fully developed. In this paper, we provide sharp finite-sample guarantees under milder technical assumptions compared with state-of-the-art for the KMS $p$-Wasserstein distance between two empirical distributions with $n$ samples for general $pin[1,infty)$. Algorithm-wise, we show that computing the KMS $2$-Wasserstein distance is NP-hard, and then we further propose a semidefinite relaxation (SDR) formulation (which can be solved efficiently in polynomial time) and provide a relaxation gap for the SDP solution. We provide numerical examples to demonstrate the good performance of our scheme for high-dimensional two-sample testing.

Read more

5/31/2024