Integrated Push-and-Pull Update Model for Goal-Oriented Effective Communication

Read original: arXiv:2407.14092 - Published 7/22/2024 by Pouya Agheli, Nikolaos Pappas, Petar Popovski, Marios Kountouris
Total Score

0

📈

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Integrated push-and-pull update model for goal-oriented effective communication
  • Focuses on status update systems and decision-making
  • Proposes a new model that combines push and pull update mechanisms

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces an [object Object] for [object Object]. This model is designed for [object Object] and decision-making processes.

The key idea is to combine both "push" and "pull" update mechanisms. In a push system, updates are automatically sent to receivers. In a pull system, receivers request updates as needed. The new integrated model aims to leverage the benefits of both approaches to improve the overall effectiveness of communication.

By integrating these two update mechanisms, the model aims to enhance [object Object] and support better decision-making. The goal is to ensure that the right information is delivered to the right people at the right time, ultimately leading to more effective collaboration and coordination.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes an [object Object] for [object Object]. The model combines push and pull update mechanisms to address the limitations of traditional status update systems and improve decision-making.

In the push-based approach, updates are automatically sent to receivers, while in the pull-based approach, receivers request updates as needed. The integrated model aims to leverage the strengths of both approaches to enhance the overall effectiveness of communication.

The key components of the proposed model include:

  1. Push Update Mechanism: Senders proactively push updates to receivers based on predefined rules or triggers.
  2. Pull Update Mechanism: Receivers request updates from senders based on their own needs and requirements.
  3. Integrated Decision-Making: The model integrates the push and pull update mechanisms to support more informed decision-making by ensuring that the right information is delivered to the right people at the right time.

The paper discusses the design and implementation of the integrated push-and-pull update model, as well as potential applications and use cases in various domains, such as [object Object] and [object Object].

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel approach to improving goal-oriented communication and decision-making by integrating push and pull update mechanisms. However, some potential limitations and areas for further research are worth considering:

  1. Complexity and Implementation Challenges: Integrating two distinct update mechanisms may introduce additional complexity in the system design and implementation. The paper could have explored the trade-offs and challenges associated with this integration in more detail.

  2. Evaluating Effectiveness: The paper does not provide a comprehensive evaluation of the proposed model's effectiveness in real-world scenarios. Further research could focus on empirical studies or case studies to assess the model's performance and its impact on decision-making outcomes.

  3. Adaptability and Personalization: The paper could have discussed how the integrated model can be adapted to different organizational or domain-specific requirements, or how it could be personalized to individual user needs and preferences.

  4. Security and Privacy Considerations: The paper does not explicitly address potential security and privacy concerns that may arise from the increased data sharing and access inherent in the integrated push-and-pull model. Further research could explore mitigation strategies in this regard.

Overall, the paper presents an interesting and potentially valuable approach to enhancing goal-oriented communication and decision-making. However, additional research and evaluation are needed to fully understand the practical implications and potential limitations of the proposed model.

Conclusion

The [object Object] aims to address the shortcomings of traditional status update systems by combining push and pull update mechanisms. By integrating these two approaches, the model seeks to improve the timeliness, relevance, and effectiveness of information delivery, ultimately supporting more informed decision-making.

The proposed model has the potential to enhance collaboration and coordination in a wide range of applications, from [object Object] to [object Object]. However, further research is needed to fully evaluate the model's performance, address potential implementation challenges, and explore strategies for personalization and security.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📈

Total Score

0

Integrated Push-and-Pull Update Model for Goal-Oriented Effective Communication

Pouya Agheli, Nikolaos Pappas, Petar Popovski, Marios Kountouris

This paper studies decision-making for goal-oriented effective communication. We consider an end-to-end status update system where a sensing agent (SA) observes a source, generates and transmits updates to an actuation agent (AA), while the AA takes actions to accomplish a goal at the endpoint. We integrate the push- and pull-based update communication models to obtain a push-and-pull model, which allows the transmission controller at the SA to decide to push an update to the AA and the query controller at the AA to pull updates by raising queries at specific time instances. To gauge effectiveness, we utilize a grade of effectiveness (GoE) metric incorporating updates' freshness, usefulness, and timeliness of actions as qualitative attributes. We then derive effect-aware policies to maximize the expected discounted sum of updates' effectiveness subject to induced costs. The effect-aware policy at the SA considers the potential effectiveness of communicated updates at the endpoint, while at the AA, it accounts for the probabilistic evolution of the source and importance of generated updates. Our results show the proposed push-and-pull model outperforms models solely based on push- or pull-based updates both in terms of efficiency and effectiveness. Additionally, using effect-aware policies at both agents enhances effectiveness compared to periodic and/or probabilistic effect-agnostic policies at either or both agents.

Read more

7/22/2024

🔄

Total Score

0

Goal-Oriented Multiple Access Connectivity for Networked Intelligent Systems

Pouya Agheli, Nikolaos Pappas, Marios Kountouris

We design a self-decision goal-oriented multiple access scheme, where sensing agents observe a common event and individually decide to communicate the event's attributes as updates to the monitoring agents, to satisfy a certain goal. Decisions are based on the usefulness of updates, generated under uniform, change- and semantics-aware acquisition, as well as statistics and updates of other agents. We obtain optimal activation probabilities and threshold criteria for decision-making under all schemes, maximizing a grade of effectiveness metric. Alongside studying the effect of different parameters on effectiveness, our simulation results show that the self-decision scheme may attain at least 92% of optimal performance.

Read more

6/17/2024

Pragmatic Goal-Oriented Communications under Semantic-Effectiveness Channel Errors
Total Score

0

Pragmatic Goal-Oriented Communications under Semantic-Effectiveness Channel Errors

Tom'as Huttebraucker, Mohamed Sana, Emilio Calvanese Strinati

In forthcoming AI-assisted 6G networks, integrating semantic, pragmatic, and goal-oriented communication strategies becomes imperative. This integration will enable sensing, transmission, and processing of exclusively pertinent task data, ensuring conveyed information possesses understandable, pragmatic semantic significance, aligning with destination needs and goals. Without doubt, no communication is error free. Within this context, besides errors stemming from typical wireless communication dynamics, potential distortions between transmitter-intended and receiver-interpreted meanings can emerge due to limitations in semantic processing capabilities, as well as language and knowledge representation disparities between transmitters and receivers. The main contribution of this paper is two-fold. First, it proposes and details a novel mathematical modeling of errors stemming from language mismatches at both semantic and effectiveness levels. Second, it provides a novel algorithmic solution to counteract these types of errors which leverages optimal transport theory. Our numerical results show the potential of the proposed mechanism to compensate for language mismatches, thereby enhancing the attainability of reliable communication under noisy communication environments.

Read more

6/5/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

Goal-oriented Estimation of Multiple Markov Sources in Resource-constrained Systems

Jiping Luo, Nikolaos Pappas

This paper investigates goal-oriented communication for remote estimation of multiple Markov sources in resource-constrained networks. An agent decides the updating times of the sources and transmits the packet to a remote destination over an unreliable channel with delay. The destination is tasked with source reconstruction for actuation. We utilize the metric textit{cost of actuation error} (CAE) to capture the state-dependent actuation costs. We aim for a sampling policy that minimizes the long-term average CAE subject to an average resource constraint. We formulate this problem as an average-cost constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP) and relax it into an unconstrained problem by utilizing textit{Lyapunov drift} techniques. Then, we propose a low-complexity textit{drift-plus-penalty} (DPP) policy for systems with known source/channel statistics and a Lyapunov optimization-based deep reinforcement learning (LO-DRL) policy for unknown environments. Our policies significantly reduce the number of uninformative transmissions by exploiting the timing of the important information.

Read more

6/4/2024