Interactive Agents: Simulating Counselor-Client Psychological Counseling via Role-Playing LLM-to-LLM Interactions

Read original: arXiv:2408.15787 - Published 8/29/2024 by Huachuan Qiu, Zhenzhong Lan
Total Score

0

Interactive Agents: Simulating Counselor-Client Psychological Counseling via Role-Playing LLM-to-LLM Interactions

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Develops "interactive agents" that can simulate counselor-client psychological counseling sessions through role-playing between large language models (LLMs)
  • Aims to generate synthetic data for training and evaluating dialogue systems for mental health applications
  • Explores how LLM-to-LLM interactions can capture the complexities of human-to-human counseling conversations

Plain English Explanation

This paper explores the idea of using large language models (LLMs) to simulate interactive psychological counseling sessions between a counselor and a client. The researchers wanted to find a way to generate synthetic data that could be used to train and evaluate dialogue systems for mental health applications, since real-world counseling data can be difficult to obtain.

By having two LLMs take on the roles of the counselor and the client, the researchers were able to capture the nuances and complexities of a real-world counseling conversation. This allows them to create a large dataset of simulated counseling sessions that can be used to develop and test dialogue systems aimed at providing mental health support.

The key idea is that these LLM-to-LLM interactions can mimic the back-and-forth of a human-to-human counseling session, with the counselor LLM responding empathetically and providing guidance, while the client LLM expresses their thoughts and feelings. This synthetic data can then be used to train and evaluate dialogue systems that could eventually assist real people with their mental health needs.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a framework for "[link-text=Interactive Agents]interactive agents[/link-text]" that can simulate counselor-client psychological counseling sessions through role-playing between two LLMs. The goal is to generate synthetic data that can be used to train and evaluate dialogue systems for mental health applications.

The researchers developed a set of prompts and instructions to guide the LLMs in taking on the roles of the counselor and client. The counselor LLM was tasked with providing empathetic and supportive responses, while the client LLM was instructed to express their thoughts, feelings, and concerns.

Through this LLM-to-LLM interaction, the researchers were able to capture the nuances and complexities of a real-world counseling conversation, including the counselor's use of active listening, open-ended questions, and reflection. The resulting dialogues were then annotated and analyzed to extract insights about the dynamics of the counseling process.

The researchers argue that this approach of [link-text=Dialogue System]dialogue system[/link-text] simulation can be a valuable tool for developing and testing mental health-focused dialogue systems, as it allows for the generation of large, diverse datasets that can be difficult to obtain from real-world counseling sessions.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several limitations of their approach, including the inherent biases and limitations of the LLMs themselves. The simulated dialogues may not fully capture the emotional depth and interpersonal dynamics of real-world counseling, and the quality of the generated data may be dependent on the specific prompts and instructions used.

Additionally, the researchers note that the synthetic data generated by this approach would need to be carefully validated and tested before being used to train real-world dialogue systems. There are concerns about the potential for these systems to perpetuate biases or provide inaccurate or harmful advice.

Further research is needed to explore the long-term implications and potential risks of using LLM-to-LLM simulation for mental health applications. Ethical considerations around the use of synthetic data and the potential impact on vulnerable populations should be carefully examined.

Conclusion

This paper presents an innovative approach to generating synthetic data for training and evaluating dialogue systems in the context of mental health counseling. By simulating counselor-client interactions through LLM-to-LLM role-playing, the researchers have created a novel tool for developing and testing dialogue systems that could potentially assist people with their mental health needs.

While the approach has limitations and raises important ethical concerns, the researchers have demonstrated the potential of this technique to capture the complexities of human-to-human counseling conversations. As the field of [link-text=LLM Simulation]LLM simulation[/link-text] and [link-text=Dialogue Evaluation]dialogue evaluation[/link-text] continues to evolve, this work could contribute to the development of more effective and responsible mental health support systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Interactive Agents: Simulating Counselor-Client Psychological Counseling via Role-Playing LLM-to-LLM Interactions
Total Score

0

Interactive Agents: Simulating Counselor-Client Psychological Counseling via Role-Playing LLM-to-LLM Interactions

Huachuan Qiu, Zhenzhong Lan

Virtual counselors powered by large language models (LLMs) aim to create interactive support systems that effectively assist clients struggling with mental health challenges. To replicate counselor-client conversations, researchers have built an online mental health platform that allows professional counselors to provide clients with text-based counseling services for about an hour per session. Notwithstanding its effectiveness, challenges exist as human annotation is time-consuming, cost-intensive, privacy-protected, and not scalable. To address this issue and investigate the applicability of LLMs in psychological counseling conversation simulation, we propose a framework that employs two LLMs via role-playing for simulating counselor-client interactions. Our framework involves two LLMs, one acting as a client equipped with a specific and real-life user profile and the other playing the role of an experienced counselor, generating professional responses using integrative therapy techniques. We implement both the counselor and the client by zero-shot prompting the GPT-4 model. In order to assess the effectiveness of LLMs in simulating counselor-client interactions and understand the disparities between LLM- and human-generated conversations, we evaluate the synthetic data from various perspectives. We begin by assessing the client's performance through automatic evaluations. Next, we analyze and compare the disparities between dialogues generated by the LLM and those generated by professional counselors. Furthermore, we conduct extensive experiments to thoroughly examine the performance of our LLM-based counselor trained with synthetic interactive dialogues by benchmarking against state-of-the-art models for mental health.

Read more

8/29/2024

LLM Roleplay: Simulating Human-Chatbot Interaction
Total Score

0

LLM Roleplay: Simulating Human-Chatbot Interaction

Hovhannes Tamoyan, Hendrik Schuff, Iryna Gurevych

The development of chatbots requires collecting a large number of human-chatbot dialogues to reflect the breadth of users' sociodemographic backgrounds and conversational goals. However, the resource requirements to conduct the respective user studies can be prohibitively high and often only allow for a narrow analysis of specific dialogue goals and participant demographics. In this paper, we propose LLM-Roleplay: a goal-oriented, persona-based method to automatically generate diverse multi-turn dialogues simulating human-chatbot interaction. LLM-Roleplay can be applied to generate dialogues with any type of chatbot and uses large language models (LLMs) to play the role of textually described personas. To validate our method we collect natural human-chatbot dialogues from different sociodemographic groups and conduct a human evaluation to compare real human-chatbot dialogues with our generated dialogues. We compare the abilities of state-of-the-art LLMs in embodying personas and holding a conversation and find that our method can simulate human-chatbot dialogues with a high indistinguishability rate.

Read more

7/8/2024

Virtual Agents for Alcohol Use Counseling: Exploring LLM-Powered Motivational Interviewing
Total Score

0

Virtual Agents for Alcohol Use Counseling: Exploring LLM-Powered Motivational Interviewing

Ian Steenstra, Farnaz Nouraei, Mehdi Arjmand, Timothy W. Bickmore

We introduce a novel application of large language models (LLMs) in developing a virtual counselor capable of conducting motivational interviewing (MI) for alcohol use counseling. Access to effective counseling remains limited, particularly for substance abuse, and virtual agents offer a promising solution by leveraging LLM capabilities to simulate nuanced communication techniques inherent in MI. Our approach combines prompt engineering and integration into a user-friendly virtual platform to facilitate realistic, empathetic interactions. We evaluate the effectiveness of our virtual agent through a series of studies focusing on replicating MI techniques and human counselor dialog. Initial findings suggest that our LLM-powered virtual agent matches human counselors' empathetic and adaptive conversational skills, presenting a significant step forward in virtual health counseling and providing insights into the design and implementation of LLM-based therapeutic interactions.

Read more

7/12/2024

Real or Robotic? Assessing Whether LLMs Accurately Simulate Qualities of Human Responses in Dialogue
Total Score

0

New!Real or Robotic? Assessing Whether LLMs Accurately Simulate Qualities of Human Responses in Dialogue

Johnathan Ivey, Shivani Kumar, Jiayu Liu, Hua Shen, Sushrita Rakshit, Rohan Raju, Haotian Zhang, Aparna Ananthasubramaniam, Junghwan Kim, Bowen Yi, Dustin Wright, Abraham Israeli, Anders Giovanni M{o}ller, Lechen Zhang, David Jurgens

Studying and building datasets for dialogue tasks is both expensive and time-consuming due to the need to recruit, train, and collect data from study participants. In response, much recent work has sought to use large language models (LLMs) to simulate both human-human and human-LLM interactions, as they have been shown to generate convincingly human-like text in many settings. However, to what extent do LLM-based simulations textit{actually} reflect human dialogues? In this work, we answer this question by generating a large-scale dataset of 100,000 paired LLM-LLM and human-LLM dialogues from the WildChat dataset and quantifying how well the LLM simulations align with their human counterparts. Overall, we find relatively low alignment between simulations and human interactions, demonstrating a systematic divergence along the multiple textual properties, including style and content. Further, in comparisons of English, Chinese, and Russian dialogues, we find that models perform similarly. Our results suggest that LLMs generally perform better when the human themself writes in a way that is more similar to the LLM's own style.

Read more

9/16/2024