LLM Roleplay: Simulating Human-Chatbot Interaction
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Explores the potential of large language models (LLMs) for simulating human-chatbot interactions through roleplay
- Proposes a framework for customizable, persona-driven role-playing agents
- Discusses the challenges and opportunities in designing and evaluating such LLM-based dialogue systems
Plain English Explanation
The research paper focuses on using large language models (LLMs) to simulate human-chatbot interactions through roleplay. The key idea is to create customizable, persona-driven role-playing agents that can engage in natural conversations, mimicking the way humans interact.
The paper proposes a framework for designing and evaluating these LLM-based dialogue systems. It explores the challenges in creating agents that can convincingly embody different personalities and engage in multi-round, co-creative exchanges. The researchers also discuss the potential applications of this technology, such as in entertainment, education, and social interaction.
One of the main benefits of this approach is the ability to create highly personalized chatbots that can adapt their behavior and communication style to the user's preferences and the context of the conversation. This could lead to more engaging and meaningful interactions between humans and AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a framework for developing [<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/simschat-customisable-persona-driven-role-playing-agent">customizable, persona-driven role-playing agents</a>] using large language models (LLMs). The key components of this framework include:
- Persona Modeling: The ability to define and encode specific personality traits, preferences, and behaviors that the agent should exhibit during the roleplay.
- Conversational Modeling: Techniques for enabling the agent to engage in multi-round, co-creative dialogues, where the agent and user can build upon each other's contributions to the conversation.
- Evaluation Metrics: Strategies for assessing the quality, coherence, and engagement of the simulated human-chatbot interactions.
The paper also discusses the [<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/designing-evaluating-dialogue-llms-co-creative-improvised">challenges in designing and evaluating LLM-based dialogue systems</a>], such as ensuring consistent personality traits, maintaining coherence across multiple conversational turns, and measuring the user experience and engagement.
Critical Analysis
The research presented in the paper highlights the potential of using LLMs for simulating human-chatbot interactions through roleplay. However, the authors also acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research:
- Persona Consistency: Maintaining a consistent personality and behavior across multiple conversational turns can be challenging, and the paper suggests exploring techniques for more robust persona modeling.
- Co-creative Dialogue: Enabling the agent and user to build upon each other's contributions in a seamless and natural way is an area that requires further investigation.
- Evaluation Metrics: The authors note the need for more comprehensive and standardized evaluation frameworks to assess the quality and engagement of the simulated interactions.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential ethical concerns, such as the risk of users developing emotional attachments to these roleplay agents or the possibility of the agents being used for nefarious purposes, such as manipulation or deception.
Conclusion
The research presented in this paper demonstrates the potential of using large language models (LLMs) to create customizable, persona-driven role-playing agents that can simulate human-chatbot interactions. This technology could have applications in entertainment, education, and social interaction, enabling more engaging and personalized experiences with AI systems.
However, the paper also highlights the significant challenges in designing and evaluating such dialogue systems, particularly in maintaining consistent personality traits, enabling co-creative exchanges, and developing comprehensive evaluation metrics. Further research is needed to address these issues and explore the ethical implications of this technology.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
LLM Roleplay: Simulating Human-Chatbot Interaction
Hovhannes Tamoyan, Hendrik Schuff, Iryna Gurevych
The development of chatbots requires collecting a large number of human-chatbot dialogues to reflect the breadth of users' sociodemographic backgrounds and conversational goals. However, the resource requirements to conduct the respective user studies can be prohibitively high and often only allow for a narrow analysis of specific dialogue goals and participant demographics. In this paper, we propose LLM-Roleplay: a goal-oriented, persona-based method to automatically generate diverse multi-turn dialogues simulating human-chatbot interaction. LLM-Roleplay can be applied to generate dialogues with any type of chatbot and uses large language models (LLMs) to play the role of textually described personas. To validate our method we collect natural human-chatbot dialogues from different sociodemographic groups and conduct a human evaluation to compare real human-chatbot dialogues with our generated dialogues. We compare the abilities of state-of-the-art LLMs in embodying personas and holding a conversation and find that our method can simulate human-chatbot dialogues with a high indistinguishability rate.
Read more7/8/2024
0
New!Real or Robotic? Assessing Whether LLMs Accurately Simulate Qualities of Human Responses in Dialogue
Johnathan Ivey, Shivani Kumar, Jiayu Liu, Hua Shen, Sushrita Rakshit, Rohan Raju, Haotian Zhang, Aparna Ananthasubramaniam, Junghwan Kim, Bowen Yi, Dustin Wright, Abraham Israeli, Anders Giovanni M{o}ller, Lechen Zhang, David Jurgens
Studying and building datasets for dialogue tasks is both expensive and time-consuming due to the need to recruit, train, and collect data from study participants. In response, much recent work has sought to use large language models (LLMs) to simulate both human-human and human-LLM interactions, as they have been shown to generate convincingly human-like text in many settings. However, to what extent do LLM-based simulations textit{actually} reflect human dialogues? In this work, we answer this question by generating a large-scale dataset of 100,000 paired LLM-LLM and human-LLM dialogues from the WildChat dataset and quantifying how well the LLM simulations align with their human counterparts. Overall, we find relatively low alignment between simulations and human interactions, demonstrating a systematic divergence along the multiple textual properties, including style and content. Further, in comparisons of English, Chinese, and Russian dialogues, we find that models perform similarly. Our results suggest that LLMs generally perform better when the human themself writes in a way that is more similar to the LLM's own style.
Read more9/16/2024
0
SimsChat: A Customisable Persona-Driven Role-Playing Agent
Bohao Yang, Dong Liu, Chen Tang, Chenghao Xiao, Kun Zhao, Chao Li, Lin Yuan, Guang Yang, Lanxiao Huang, Chenghua Lin
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate a remarkable ability to comprehend human instructions and generate high-quality text. This capability allows LLMs to function as agents that can emulate human beings at a more sophisticated level, beyond the mere replication of basic human behaviours. However, there is a lack of exploring into leveraging LLMs to craft characters from diverse aspects. In this work, we introduce the Customisable Conversation Agent Framework, which leverages LLMs to simulate real-world characters that can be freely customised according to various user preferences. This adaptable framework is beneficial for the design of customisable characters and role-playing agents aligned with human preferences. We propose the SimsConv dataset, which encompasses 68 different customised characters, 1,360 multi-turn role-playing dialogues, and a total of 13,971 interaction dialogues. The characters are created from several real-world elements, such as career, aspiration, trait, and skill. Building upon these foundations, we present SimsChat, a freely customisable role-playing agent. It incorporates diverse real-world scenes and topic-specific character interaction dialogues, thereby simulating characters' life experiences in various scenarios and topic-specific interactions with specific emotions. Experimental results indicate that our proposed framework achieves desirable performance and provides a valuable guideline for the construction of more accurate human simulacra in the future. Our data and code are publicly available at https://github.com/Bernard-Yang/SimsChat.
Read more8/19/2024
0
Interactive Agents: Simulating Counselor-Client Psychological Counseling via Role-Playing LLM-to-LLM Interactions
Huachuan Qiu, Zhenzhong Lan
Virtual counselors powered by large language models (LLMs) aim to create interactive support systems that effectively assist clients struggling with mental health challenges. To replicate counselor-client conversations, researchers have built an online mental health platform that allows professional counselors to provide clients with text-based counseling services for about an hour per session. Notwithstanding its effectiveness, challenges exist as human annotation is time-consuming, cost-intensive, privacy-protected, and not scalable. To address this issue and investigate the applicability of LLMs in psychological counseling conversation simulation, we propose a framework that employs two LLMs via role-playing for simulating counselor-client interactions. Our framework involves two LLMs, one acting as a client equipped with a specific and real-life user profile and the other playing the role of an experienced counselor, generating professional responses using integrative therapy techniques. We implement both the counselor and the client by zero-shot prompting the GPT-4 model. In order to assess the effectiveness of LLMs in simulating counselor-client interactions and understand the disparities between LLM- and human-generated conversations, we evaluate the synthetic data from various perspectives. We begin by assessing the client's performance through automatic evaluations. Next, we analyze and compare the disparities between dialogues generated by the LLM and those generated by professional counselors. Furthermore, we conduct extensive experiments to thoroughly examine the performance of our LLM-based counselor trained with synthetic interactive dialogues by benchmarking against state-of-the-art models for mental health.
Read more8/29/2024