Interactive Question Answering Systems: Literature Review

2209.01621

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/22/2024 by Giovanni Maria Biancofiore, Yashar Deldjoo, Tommaso Di Noia, Eugenio Di Sciascio, Fedelucio Narducci

āœ…

Abstract

Question answering systems are recognized as popular and frequently effective means of information seeking on the web. In such systems, information seekers can receive a concise response to their query by presenting their questions in natural language. Interactive question answering is a recently proposed and increasingly popular solution that resides at the intersection of question answering and dialogue systems. On the one hand, the user can ask questions in normal language and locate the actual response to her inquiry; on the other hand, the system can prolong the question-answering session into a dialogue if there are multiple probable replies, very few, or ambiguities in the initial request. By permitting the user to ask more questions, interactive question answering enables users to dynamically interact with the system and receive more precise results. This survey offers a detailed overview of the interactive question-answering methods that are prevalent in current literature. It begins by explaining the foundational principles of question-answering systems, hence defining new notations and taxonomies to combine all identified works inside a unified framework. The reviewed published work on interactive question-answering systems is then presented and examined in terms of its proposed methodology, evaluation approaches, and dataset/application domain. We also describe trends surrounding specific tasks and issues raised by the community, so shedding light on the future interests of scholars. Our work is further supported by a GitHub page with a synthesis of all the major topics covered in this literature study. https://sisinflab.github.io/interactive-question-answering-systems-survey/

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Question answering systems are popular and effective ways for people to find information online by asking natural language questions.
  • Interactive question answering is a new approach that combines question answering with dialogue systems.
  • This allows users to ask follow-up questions and interact with the system to get more precise answers to their queries.
  • This survey paper provides a detailed overview of the current research on interactive question answering methods.

Plain English Explanation

Question answering systems allow people to ask questions in normal language and get concise, direct answers. These systems have become quite popular and useful for finding information on the web. Interactive question answering is a new approach that builds on traditional question answering by incorporating elements of dialogue systems.

With interactive question answering, users can ask follow-up questions and have an interactive back-and-forth with the system. This allows them to clarify their initial query, ask for more details, or get additional information to help them find what they're looking for. The system can provide more precise and tailored responses by engaging the user in a conversation, rather than just giving a single answer to the original question.

This survey paper provides an in-depth look at the current research on interactive question answering methods. It explains the core principles behind question answering systems, establishes new frameworks for categorizing the work in this area, and then reviews the published research in detail. This includes examining the methodologies, evaluation approaches, and application domains of the interactive question answering systems that have been developed.

The paper also highlights emerging trends and issues that the research community is exploring, giving insights into the future directions for this field. An accompanying GitHub page provides a synthesis of the key topics covered in this comprehensive literature review.

Technical Explanation

This survey paper offers a detailed overview of the current state of research on interactive question answering (IQA) systems. IQA resides at the intersection of traditional question answering and dialogue systems.

Question answering systems enable users to receive concise answers to their queries by posing natural language questions. IQA builds on this by allowing the user to engage in an interactive dialogue with the system. Rather than just getting a single response, the user can ask follow-up questions, seek clarification, or request additional details. This back-and-forth interaction enables the system to provide more precise and tailored answers.

The paper begins by explaining the fundamental principles of question answering systems, establishing new taxonomies and frameworks to organize the various IQA approaches identified in the literature. It then provides an in-depth review of published research on IQA, analyzing the proposed methodologies, evaluation techniques, and application domains.

Key trends and issues raised by the research community are also discussed, offering insights into the future directions for IQA. For example, some studies have explored enhancing question answering in enterprise knowledge bases or improving health-related question answering.

The paper is further supported by a GitHub page that synthesizes the major topics covered in this comprehensive literature review on interactive question answering systems.

Critical Analysis

The survey paper provides a thorough and well-structured overview of the current research on interactive question answering (IQA) systems. By establishing new taxonomies and frameworks, the authors have created a cohesive way to organize the diverse set of IQA approaches identified in the literature.

However, the paper does not delve too deeply into the specific limitations or potential issues with the existing IQA systems. While it highlights emerging trends and areas of interest, such as enhancing question answering in enterprise knowledge bases or improving health-related question answering, it could have explored these in more detail.

Additionally, the paper does not critically analyze or challenge any of the research findings presented. A more balanced perspective, with both the strengths and weaknesses of the IQA approaches discussed, would have provided readers with a more well-rounded understanding of the current state of the field.

Despite these limitations, the survey paper succeeds in providing a comprehensive and organized overview of interactive question answering systems. The accompanying GitHub page, which synthesizes the key topics covered, is a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners interested in this rapidly evolving area of study.

Conclusion

This survey paper offers a detailed and structured overview of the current research on interactive question answering (IQA) systems. IQA combines traditional question answering with dialogue systems, allowing users to engage in an interactive back-and-forth to get more precise and tailored responses to their queries.

The paper establishes new taxonomies and frameworks to categorize the various IQA approaches identified in the literature, and then provides an in-depth review of the published research in this area. It examines the proposed methodologies, evaluation techniques, and application domains of the IQA systems, as well as highlighting emerging trends and issues raised by the research community.

While the paper could have delved deeper into the limitations and potential issues with the existing IQA systems, it succeeds in providing a comprehensive and well-organized summary of this rapidly evolving field. The accompanying GitHub page serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners interested in exploring the latest developments in interactive question answering.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

From Explainable to Interactive AI: A Literature Review on Current Trends in Human-AI Interaction

From Explainable to Interactive AI: A Literature Review on Current Trends in Human-AI Interaction

Muhammad Raees, Inge Meijerink, Ioanna Lykourentzou, Vassilis-Javed Khan, Konstantinos Papangelis

YC

0

Reddit

0

AI systems are increasingly being adopted across various domains and application areas. With this surge, there is a growing research focus and societal concern for actively involving humans in developing, operating, and adopting these systems. Despite this concern, most existing literature on AI and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) primarily focuses on explaining how AI systems operate and, at times, allowing users to contest AI decisions. Existing studies often overlook more impactful forms of user interaction with AI systems, such as giving users agency beyond contestability and enabling them to adapt and even co-design the AI's internal mechanics. In this survey, we aim to bridge this gap by reviewing the state-of-the-art in Human-Centered AI literature, the domain where AI and HCI studies converge, extending past Explainable and Contestable AI, delving into the Interactive AI and beyond. Our analysis contributes to shaping the trajectory of future Interactive AI design and advocates for a more user-centric approach that provides users with greater agency, fostering not only their understanding of AI's workings but also their active engagement in its development and evolution.

Read more

5/27/2024

SurveyAgent: A Conversational System for Personalized and Efficient Research Survey

SurveyAgent: A Conversational System for Personalized and Efficient Research Survey

Xintao Wang, Jiangjie Chen, Nianqi Li, Lida Chen, Xinfeng Yuan, Wei Shi, Xuyang Ge, Rui Xu, Yanghua Xiao

YC

0

Reddit

0

In the rapidly advancing research fields such as AI, managing and staying abreast of the latest scientific literature has become a significant challenge for researchers. Although previous efforts have leveraged AI to assist with literature searches, paper recommendations, and question-answering, a comprehensive support system that addresses the holistic needs of researchers has been lacking. This paper introduces SurveyAgent, a novel conversational system designed to provide personalized and efficient research survey assistance to researchers. SurveyAgent integrates three key modules: Knowledge Management for organizing papers, Recommendation for discovering relevant literature, and Query Answering for engaging with content on a deeper level. This system stands out by offering a unified platform that supports researchers through various stages of their literature review process, facilitated by a conversational interface that prioritizes user interaction and personalization. Our evaluation demonstrates SurveyAgent's effectiveness in streamlining research activities, showcasing its capability to facilitate how researchers interact with scientific literature.

Read more

4/10/2024

Improving Health Question Answering with Reliable and Time-Aware Evidence Retrieval

Improving Health Question Answering with Reliable and Time-Aware Evidence Retrieval

Juraj Vladika, Florian Matthes

YC

0

Reddit

0

In today's digital world, seeking answers to health questions on the Internet is a common practice. However, existing question answering (QA) systems often rely on using pre-selected and annotated evidence documents, thus making them inadequate for addressing novel questions. Our study focuses on the open-domain QA setting, where the key challenge is to first uncover relevant evidence in large knowledge bases. By utilizing the common retrieve-then-read QA pipeline and PubMed as a trustworthy collection of medical research documents, we answer health questions from three diverse datasets. We modify different retrieval settings to observe their influence on the QA pipeline's performance, including the number of retrieved documents, sentence selection process, the publication year of articles, and their number of citations. Our results reveal that cutting down on the amount of retrieved documents and favoring more recent and highly cited documents can improve the final macro F1 score up to 10%. We discuss the results, highlight interesting examples, and outline challenges for future research, like managing evidence disagreement and crafting user-friendly explanations.

Read more

4/15/2024

MrRank: Improving Question Answering Retrieval System through Multi-Result Ranking Model

MrRank: Improving Question Answering Retrieval System through Multi-Result Ranking Model

Danupat Khamnuansin, Tawunrat Chalothorn, Ekapol Chuangsuwanich

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with hallucinations and outdated information. To address this, Information Retrieval (IR) systems can be employed to augment LLMs with up-to-date knowledge. However, existing IR techniques contain deficiencies, posing a performance bottleneck. Given the extensive array of IR systems, combining diverse approaches presents a viable strategy. Nevertheless, prior attempts have yielded restricted efficacy. In this work, we propose an approach that leverages learning-to-rank techniques to combine heterogeneous IR systems. We demonstrate the method on two Retrieval Question Answering (ReQA) tasks. Our empirical findings exhibit a significant performance enhancement, outperforming previous approaches and achieving state-of-the-art results on ReQA SQuAD.

Read more

6/11/2024