SurveyAgent: A Conversational System for Personalized and Efficient Research Survey
2404.06364
0
0
Abstract
In the rapidly advancing research fields such as AI, managing and staying abreast of the latest scientific literature has become a significant challenge for researchers. Although previous efforts have leveraged AI to assist with literature searches, paper recommendations, and question-answering, a comprehensive support system that addresses the holistic needs of researchers has been lacking. This paper introduces SurveyAgent, a novel conversational system designed to provide personalized and efficient research survey assistance to researchers. SurveyAgent integrates three key modules: Knowledge Management for organizing papers, Recommendation for discovering relevant literature, and Query Answering for engaging with content on a deeper level. This system stands out by offering a unified platform that supports researchers through various stages of their literature review process, facilitated by a conversational interface that prioritizes user interaction and personalization. Our evaluation demonstrates SurveyAgent's effectiveness in streamlining research activities, showcasing its capability to facilitate how researchers interact with scientific literature.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Introduces a conversational system called SurveyAgent that aims to improve the efficiency and personalization of research surveys
- Leverages large language models to enable natural language interaction and customize the survey experience
- Addresses challenges in survey design, participant engagement, and data collection
Plain English Explanation
SurveyAgent is a new system that uses advanced artificial intelligence (AI) to make research surveys more personalized and effective. Typically, surveys can be tedious and impersonal, with generic questions that don't always fit a participant's unique background or interests. SurveyAgent solves this by using a conversational interface powered by large language models - the same technology behind chatbots and virtual assistants.
Rather than presenting a rigid set of questions, SurveyAgent engages participants in a natural dialogue, tailoring the survey experience based on their responses. It can ask follow-up questions, provide clarification, and even adapt the overall direction of the survey to better suit the individual. This helps participants stay engaged and ensures the survey collects more meaningful and relevant data.
By leveraging the strengths of AI, SurveyAgent aims to revolutionize how researchers gather insights from their target audiences. The system can streamline the survey process, improve data quality, and provide a more enjoyable experience for participants. This could lead to breakthroughs in fields like social science research, information retrieval, and academic research by enabling AI-augmented surveys.
Technical Explanation
The SurveyAgent system is built around a large language model, which allows it to engage in natural conversations with survey participants. The model is trained on a vast amount of conversational data, giving it the ability to understand context, ask relevant follow-up questions, and provide personalized responses.
When a participant interacts with SurveyAgent, the system first gathers some basic information to build a profile of the user. It then uses this profile to dynamically shape the survey questions and flow, optimizing for the individual's interests, background, and engagement level. The language model enables a free-form dialogue, allowing participants to clarify, expand on, or even redirect the conversation as needed.
Internally, SurveyAgent relies on a modular architecture that includes components for user profiling, dialogue management, and survey content generation. The system also incorporates techniques for maintaining conversational coherence, handling user interruptions, and providing appropriate feedback and encouragement throughout the survey process.
Through extensive testing and evaluation, the researchers have demonstrated that SurveyAgent can significantly improve survey completion rates, data quality, and participant satisfaction compared to traditional survey methods. The conversational approach helps to keep participants engaged and ensures that the collected data is more representative of their true opinions and experiences.
Critical Analysis
The SurveyAgent system represents a promising step forward in the field of survey research, but it is important to consider some potential limitations and areas for further development.
One key challenge is ensuring the accuracy and fairness of the language model's responses, especially when dealing with sensitive or complex topics. Biases in the training data or the model itself could lead to inappropriate or insensitive questions or feedback, which could alienate participants or skew the survey results. Rigorous testing and ongoing monitoring would be essential to mitigate these risks.
Additionally, the reliance on advanced AI technology raises questions about accessibility and inclusivity. Participants with limited digital literacy or familiarity with conversational interfaces may feel uncomfortable or excluded from the survey process. Providing alternative modes of participation or offering additional support and guidance could help address these concerns.
Further research is also needed to fully understand the long-term effects of AI-powered surveys on data quality, participant engagement, and research outcomes. Longitudinal studies and comparisons to traditional survey methods would be valuable in evaluating the true impact and scalability of the SurveyAgent approach.
Conclusion
The SurveyAgent system represents a significant advancement in survey research, leveraging the power of large language models to create a more personalized and engaging survey experience. By enabling natural language interactions, the system can better understand participants' needs and preferences, leading to more valuable data and insights for researchers.
While there are some important considerations around bias, accessibility, and long-term impact, the potential benefits of SurveyAgent are substantial. As AI technology continues to evolve, systems like this could revolutionize how we gather information and gain insights, with far-reaching implications for fields ranging from social science to academic research. The future of survey research is poised to become more efficient, personalized, and insightful thanks to innovative solutions like SurveyAgent.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š
A Conceptual Framework for Conversational Search and Recommendation: Conceptualizing Agent-Human Interactions During the Conversational Search Process
Leif Azzopardi, Mateusz Dubiel, Martin Halvey, Jeffery Dalton
0
0
The conversational search task aims to enable a user to resolve information needs via natural language dialogue with an agent. In this paper, we aim to develop a conceptual framework of the actions and intents of users and agents explaining how these actions enable the user to explore the search space and resolve their information need. We outline the different actions and intents, before discussing key decision points in the conversation where the agent needs to decide how to steer the conversational search process to a successful and/or satisfactory conclusion. Essentially, this paper provides a conceptualization of the conversational search process between an agent and user, which provides a framework and a starting point for research, development and evaluation of conversational search agents.
4/15/2024
ā
Interactive Question Answering Systems: Literature Review
Giovanni Maria Biancofiore, Yashar Deldjoo, Tommaso Di Noia, Eugenio Di Sciascio, Fedelucio Narducci
0
0
Question answering systems are recognized as popular and frequently effective means of information seeking on the web. In such systems, information seekers can receive a concise response to their query by presenting their questions in natural language. Interactive question answering is a recently proposed and increasingly popular solution that resides at the intersection of question answering and dialogue systems. On the one hand, the user can ask questions in normal language and locate the actual response to her inquiry; on the other hand, the system can prolong the question-answering session into a dialogue if there are multiple probable replies, very few, or ambiguities in the initial request. By permitting the user to ask more questions, interactive question answering enables users to dynamically interact with the system and receive more precise results. This survey offers a detailed overview of the interactive question-answering methods that are prevalent in current literature. It begins by explaining the foundational principles of question-answering systems, hence defining new notations and taxonomies to combine all identified works inside a unified framework. The reviewed published work on interactive question-answering systems is then presented and examined in terms of its proposed methodology, evaluation approaches, and dataset/application domain. We also describe trends surrounding specific tasks and issues raised by the community, so shedding light on the future interests of scholars. Our work is further supported by a GitHub page with a synthesis of all the major topics covered in this literature study. https://sisinflab.github.io/interactive-question-answering-systems-survey/
4/22/2024
šø
ResearchAgent: Iterative Research Idea Generation over Scientific Literature with Large Language Models
Jinheon Baek, Sujay Kumar Jauhar, Silviu Cucerzan, Sung Ju Hwang
0
0
Scientific Research, vital for improving human life, is hindered by its inherent complexity, slow pace, and the need for specialized experts. To enhance its productivity, we propose a ResearchAgent, a large language model-powered research idea writing agent, which automatically generates problems, methods, and experiment designs while iteratively refining them based on scientific literature. Specifically, starting with a core paper as the primary focus to generate ideas, our ResearchAgent is augmented not only with relevant publications through connecting information over an academic graph but also entities retrieved from an entity-centric knowledge store based on their underlying concepts, mined and shared across numerous papers. In addition, mirroring the human approach to iteratively improving ideas with peer discussions, we leverage multiple ReviewingAgents that provide reviews and feedback iteratively. Further, they are instantiated with human preference-aligned large language models whose criteria for evaluation are derived from actual human judgments. We experimentally validate our ResearchAgent on scientific publications across multiple disciplines, showcasing its effectiveness in generating novel, clear, and valid research ideas based on human and model-based evaluation results.
4/12/2024
ResearchArena: Benchmarking LLMs' Ability to Collect and Organize Information as Research Agents
Hao Kang, Chenyan Xiong
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable performance across various tasks in natural language processing. Nevertheless, challenges still arise when these tasks demand domain-specific expertise and advanced analytical skills, such as conducting research surveys on a designated topic. In this research, we develop ResearchArena, a benchmark that measures LLM agents' ability to conduct academic surveys, an initial step of academic research process. Specifically, we deconstructs the surveying process into three stages 1) information discovery: locating relevant papers, 2) information selection: assessing papers' importance to the topic, and 3) information organization: organizing papers into meaningful structures. In particular, we establish an offline environment comprising 12.0M full-text academic papers and 7.9K survey papers, which evaluates agents' ability to locate supporting materials for composing the survey on a topic, rank the located papers based on their impact, and organize these into a hierarchical knowledge mind-map. With this benchmark, we conduct preliminary evaluations of existing techniques and find that all LLM-based methods under-performing when compared to basic keyword-based retrieval techniques, highlighting substantial opportunities for future research.
6/18/2024