Interpretable-by-Design Text Understanding with Iteratively Generated Concept Bottleneck

2310.19660

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/4/2024 by Josh Magnus Ludan, Qing Lyu, Yue Yang, Liam Dugan, Mark Yatskar, Chris Callison-Burch

🤔

Abstract

Black-box deep neural networks excel in text classification, yet their application in high-stakes domains is hindered by their lack of interpretability. To address this, we propose Text Bottleneck Models (TBM), an intrinsically interpretable text classification framework that offers both global and local explanations. Rather than directly predicting the output label, TBM predicts categorical values for a sparse set of salient concepts and uses a linear layer over those concept values to produce the final prediction. These concepts can be automatically discovered and measured by a Large Language Model (LLM) without the need for human curation. Experiments on 12 diverse text understanding datasets demonstrate that TBM can rival the performance of black-box baselines such as few-shot GPT-4 and finetuned DeBERTa while falling short against finetuned GPT-3.5. Comprehensive human evaluation validates that TBM can generate high-quality concepts relevant to the task, and the concept measurement aligns well with human judgments, suggesting that the predictions made by TBMs are interpretable. Overall, our findings suggest that TBM is a promising new framework that enhances interpretability with minimal performance tradeoffs.

Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:

Overview

  • Black-box deep neural networks excel at text classification, but their lack of interpretability limits their use in high-stakes domains.
  • The paper proposes Text Bottleneck Models (TBM), an interpretable text classification framework that provides both global and local explanations.
  • TBM predicts categorical values for a sparse set of salient concepts and uses a linear layer over those concepts to make the final prediction.
  • The concepts can be automatically discovered and measured by a Large Language Model without human curation.
  • Experiments show TBM can rival the performance of black-box baselines like few-shot GPT-4 and finetuned DeBERTa, though it falls short against finetuned GPT-3.5.
  • Human evaluation validates that TBM can generate high-quality, relevant concepts, and the concept measurements align well with human judgments.

Plain English Explanation

Deep neural networks are exceptionally skilled at tasks like classifying text, meaning they can quickly and accurately determine the category or type of a given piece of text. However, these "black-box" models are difficult for humans to understand - it's not clear how they arrive at their conclusions. This lack of interpretability makes them challenging to use in high-stakes domains, like healthcare or finance, where it's important to understand the reasoning behind important decisions.

The researchers propose a new approach called Text Bottleneck Models (TBM) that aims to provide both high performance and interpretability. Instead of directly predicting the output label, TBM first identifies a small set of key concepts that are relevant to the task. It then uses those concept values to make the final prediction through a simple, linear calculation.

The cool part is that TBM can discover these interpretable concepts automatically, without any manual curation by humans. It uses a powerful language model to identify the most important ideas and measure how strongly they are expressed in the input text.

In experiments, TBM was able to match the performance of opaque, black-box models in many text classification tasks. And when humans evaluated the concepts identified by TBM, they found them to be high-quality and closely aligned with their own understanding. This suggests the model's reasoning is indeed interpretable and transparent.

Overall, TBM seems like a promising new approach that could bring the power of deep learning to high-stakes domains, while also making the decision-making process clearer and more accessible.

Technical Explanation

The core idea behind Text Bottleneck Models (TBM) is to create an intrinsically interpretable text classification system. Rather than directly predicting the output label, TBM first predicts a sparse set of categorical concept values and then uses a simple linear layer over those concepts to make the final prediction.

The key steps are:

  1. Automatically discover a set of salient concepts using a Large Language Model (LLM).
  2. Measure the strength of each concept in the input text using the LLM.
  3. Pass the concept values through a linear layer to produce the final classification output.

This architecture provides both global and local interpretability. The concepts themselves offer global insight into the key factors driving the prediction. And the linear layer weights indicate how much each concept contributes to the final output, providing local, example-specific explanations.

Experiments were conducted on 12 diverse text understanding datasets. TBM was able to rival the performance of black-box baselines like few-shot GPT-4 and finetuned DeBERTa, though it fell short against the more powerful finetuned GPT-3.5. Importantly, comprehensive human evaluation showed the concepts generated by TBM were highly relevant and aligned well with human judgments.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a strong case for TBM as a promising new interpretable text classification framework. However, a few caveats and areas for further research are worth noting:

  1. While TBM performed well, it still lagged behind the most powerful finetuned language models. Improving its raw performance without sacrificing interpretability could be an important area of future work.

  2. The paper does not explore TBM's robustness or sample efficiency compared to black-box models. Understanding how the interpretable architecture affects these properties could be valuable.

  3. The human evaluation focused on the relevance and alignment of the discovered concepts. Further research could investigate whether users actually find the explanations provided by TBM to be meaningful and actionable in real-world high-stakes settings.

  4. The automatic concept discovery process could potentially surface biased or problematic concepts. Careful examination of the types of concepts learned, and mechanisms to ensure they are ethical and unbiased, may be an important consideration.

Overall, while the paper presents encouraging results, there are still open questions and potential limitations that warrant further exploration as this line of research progresses.

Conclusion

Text Bottleneck Models offer a compelling new approach to text classification that enhances interpretability without major performance tradeoffs. By predicting a sparse set of salient concepts and using them to drive the final prediction, TBM provides both global and local explanations that align well with human understanding.

The ability to automatically discover these interpretable concepts is a key innovation, as it avoids the need for manual curation and makes the framework more broadly applicable. While TBM still has room for improvement, especially in raw classification performance, the promising results suggest it could be a valuable tool for bringing the power of deep learning to high-stakes domains where transparency is crucial.

As AI systems become increasingly ubiquitous, approaches like TBM that prioritize interpretability alongside performance will likely become increasingly important. This research represents an important step forward in that direction.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🔄

Learning to Intervene on Concept Bottlenecks

David Steinmann, Wolfgang Stammer, Felix Friedrich, Kristian Kersting

YC

0

Reddit

0

While traditional deep learning models often lack interpretability, concept bottleneck models (CBMs) provide inherent explanations via their concept representations. Specifically, they allow users to perform interventional interactions on these concepts by updating the concept values and thus correcting the predictive output of the model. Traditionally, however, these interventions are applied to the model only once and discarded afterward. To rectify this, we present concept bottleneck memory models (CB2M), an extension to CBMs. Specifically, a CB2M learns to generalize interventions to appropriate novel situations via a two-fold memory with which it can learn to detect mistakes and to reapply previous interventions. In this way, a CB2M learns to automatically improve model performance from a few initially obtained interventions. If no prior human interventions are available, a CB2M can detect potential mistakes of the CBM bottleneck and request targeted interventions. In our experimental evaluations on challenging scenarios like handling distribution shifts and confounded training data, we illustrate that CB2M are able to successfully generalize interventions to unseen data and can indeed identify wrongly inferred concepts. Overall, our results show that CB2M is a great tool for users to provide interactive feedback on CBMs, e.g., by guiding a user's interaction and requiring fewer interventions.

Read more

4/10/2024

Incremental Residual Concept Bottleneck Models

Incremental Residual Concept Bottleneck Models

Chenming Shang, Shiji Zhou, Yujiu Yang, Hengyuan Zhang, Xinzhe Ni, Yuwang Wang

YC

0

Reddit

0

Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) map the black-box visual representations extracted by deep neural networks onto a set of interpretable concepts and use the concepts to make predictions, enhancing the transparency of the decision-making process. Multimodal pre-trained models can match visual representations with textual concept embeddings, allowing for obtaining the interpretable concept bottleneck without the expertise concept annotations. Recent research has focused on the concept bank establishment and the high-quality concept selection. However, it is challenging to construct a comprehensive concept bank through humans or large language models, which severely limits the performance of CBMs. In this work, we propose the Incremental Residual Concept Bottleneck Model (Res-CBM) to address the challenge of concept completeness. Specifically, the residual concept bottleneck model employs a set of optimizable vectors to complete missing concepts, then the incremental concept discovery module converts the complemented vectors with unclear meanings into potential concepts in the candidate concept bank. Our approach can be applied to any user-defined concept bank, as a post-hoc processing method to enhance the performance of any CBMs. Furthermore, to measure the descriptive efficiency of CBMs, the Concept Utilization Efficiency (CUE) metric is proposed. Experiments show that the Res-CBM outperforms the current state-of-the-art methods in terms of both accuracy and efficiency and achieves comparable performance to black-box models across multiple datasets.

Read more

4/16/2024

Sparse Concept Bottleneck Models: Gumbel Tricks in Contrastive Learning

Sparse Concept Bottleneck Models: Gumbel Tricks in Contrastive Learning

Andrei Semenov, Vladimir Ivanov, Aleksandr Beznosikov, Alexander Gasnikov

YC

0

Reddit

0

We propose a novel architecture and method of explainable classification with Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs). While SOTA approaches to Image Classification task work as a black box, there is a growing demand for models that would provide interpreted results. Such a models often learn to predict the distribution over class labels using additional description of this target instances, called concepts. However, existing Bottleneck methods have a number of limitations: their accuracy is lower than that of a standard model and CBMs require an additional set of concepts to leverage. We provide a framework for creating Concept Bottleneck Model from pre-trained multi-modal encoder and new CLIP-like architectures. By introducing a new type of layers known as Concept Bottleneck Layers, we outline three methods for training them: with $ell_1$-loss, contrastive loss and loss function based on Gumbel-Softmax distribution (Sparse-CBM), while final FC layer is still trained with Cross-Entropy. We show a significant increase in accuracy using sparse hidden layers in CLIP-based bottleneck models. Which means that sparse representation of concepts activation vector is meaningful in Concept Bottleneck Models. Moreover, with our Concept Matrix Search algorithm we can improve CLIP predictions on complex datasets without any additional training or fine-tuning. The code is available at: https://github.com/Andron00e/SparseCBM.

Read more

4/5/2024

🔄

Dynamic Clue Bottlenecks: Towards Interpretable-by-Design Visual Question Answering

Xingyu Fu, Ben Zhou, Sihao Chen, Mark Yatskar, Dan Roth

YC

0

Reddit

0

Recent advances in multimodal large language models (LLMs) have shown extreme effectiveness in visual question answering (VQA). However, the design nature of these end-to-end models prevents them from being interpretable to humans, undermining trust and applicability in critical domains. While post-hoc rationales offer certain insight into understanding model behavior, these explanations are not guaranteed to be faithful to the model. In this paper, we address these shortcomings by introducing an interpretable by design model that factors model decisions into intermediate human-legible explanations, and allows people to easily understand why a model fails or succeeds. We propose the Dynamic Clue Bottleneck Model ( (DCLUB), a method that is designed towards an inherently interpretable VQA system. DCLUB provides an explainable intermediate space before the VQA decision and is faithful from the beginning, while maintaining comparable performance to black-box systems. Given a question, DCLUB first returns a set of visual clues: natural language statements of visually salient evidence from the image, and then generates the output based solely on the visual clues. To supervise and evaluate the generation of VQA explanations within DCLUB, we collect a dataset of 1.7k reasoning-focused questions with visual clues. Evaluations show that our inherently interpretable system can improve 4.64% over a comparable black-box system in reasoning-focused questions while preserving 99.43% of performance on VQA-v2.

Read more

4/16/2024