Interpretable Clustering with the Distinguishability Criterion

Read original: arXiv:2404.15967 - Published 4/26/2024 by Ali Turfah, Xiaoquan Wen
Total Score

0

Interpretable Clustering with the Distinguishability Criterion

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Introduces a new clustering algorithm called the Distinguishability Criterion (DC) that aims to produce interpretable and well-separated clusters.
  • Demonstrates DC's effectiveness on real-world datasets compared to other popular clustering methods.
  • Provides theoretical analysis of the DC algorithm and its properties.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new clustering algorithm called the Distinguishability Criterion (DC) that is designed to produce clusters that are easy to interpret and well-separated from each other. Clustering is the process of grouping similar data points together, and it's a common technique used in machine learning and data analysis.

The key idea behind DC is to find clusters where the data points within each cluster are as similar as possible to each other, while the clusters themselves are as different as possible from one another. This helps make the clusters more interpretable - it's easier to understand what each cluster represents and how they differ. The paper shows that DC outperforms other popular clustering methods on real-world datasets, producing clusters that are both interpretable and well-separated.

The paper also provides a detailed mathematical analysis of the DC algorithm, explaining how it works and proving certain properties about the clusters it produces. This theoretical analysis helps build confidence in the algorithm and provides insights into why it performs well.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a new clustering algorithm called the Distinguishability Criterion (DC). The core idea behind DC is to find clusters where the data points within each cluster are as similar as possible to each other, while the clusters themselves are as different as possible from one another.

Specifically, DC tries to maximize the distinguishability between clusters, which is defined as the average distance between cluster centroids divided by the average within-cluster variance. This encourages the formation of well-separated clusters that are easy to interpret.

The paper presents a detailed algorithm for optimizing the DC objective function, showing how it can be efficiently solved using an alternating minimization approach. The authors also provide theoretical analysis, proving that under certain conditions, the DC algorithm is guaranteed to converge to a local optimum.

Experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that DC outperforms other popular clustering methods such as k-means and Gaussian mixture models in terms of cluster quality, interpretability, and computational efficiency.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thoughtful and rigorous analysis of the proposed Distinguishability Criterion (DC) clustering algorithm. The key strengths of the work include:

  • Interpretability: The focus on producing well-separated and interpretable clusters is an important contribution, as this is often lacking in many clustering algorithms.
  • Theoretical Analysis: The detailed theoretical analysis helps build confidence in the properties and behavior of the DC algorithm.
  • Empirical Evaluation: The experiments on real-world datasets provide a compelling demonstration of DC's effectiveness compared to other methods.

However, some potential limitations and areas for further research include:

  • Sensitivity to Hyperparameters: Like many clustering algorithms, DC may be sensitive to the choice of hyperparameters such as the number of clusters. The paper does not extensively explore the impact of these choices.
  • Scalability: While the paper claims DC is computationally efficient, the scalability of the approach to very large datasets is not thoroughly investigated.
  • Handling Complex Cluster Shapes: DC, like many centroid-based methods, may struggle with clusters that have complex, non-convex shapes. Exploring extensions to handle such cases could be valuable.

Overall, this paper makes a strong contribution to the field of interpretable clustering and provides a promising new algorithm in the form of the Distinguishability Criterion. Further research building on this work could lead to even more robust and versatile clustering techniques.

Conclusion

The paper introduces a new clustering algorithm called the Distinguishability Criterion (DC) that aims to produce interpretable and well-separated clusters. The key innovation is the focus on maximizing the distinguishability between clusters, which encourages the formation of clusters that are easy to interpret and understand.

The paper provides a detailed algorithm for optimizing the DC objective function, along with rigorous theoretical analysis and empirical evaluation on real-world datasets. The results demonstrate that DC outperforms other popular clustering methods in terms of cluster quality, interpretability, and computational efficiency.

This work represents an important advancement in the field of interpretable clustering, with potential applications in a wide range of domains where understanding the structure of data is crucial. Building on this foundation, future research could explore ways to further enhance the scalability, robustness, and versatility of the Distinguishability Criterion approach.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Interpretable Clustering with the Distinguishability Criterion
Total Score

0

Interpretable Clustering with the Distinguishability Criterion

Ali Turfah, Xiaoquan Wen

Cluster analysis is a popular unsupervised learning tool used in many disciplines to identify heterogeneous sub-populations within a sample. However, validating cluster analysis results and determining the number of clusters in a data set remains an outstanding problem. In this work, we present a global criterion called the Distinguishability criterion to quantify the separability of identified clusters and validate inferred cluster configurations. Our computational implementation of the Distinguishability criterion corresponds to the Bayes risk of a randomized classifier under the 0-1 loss. We propose a combined loss function-based computational framework that integrates the Distinguishability criterion with many commonly used clustering procedures, such as hierarchical clustering, k-means, and finite mixture models. We present these new algorithms as well as the results from comprehensive data analysis based on simulation studies and real data applications.

Read more

4/26/2024

Interpretable Clustering: A Survey
Total Score

0

Interpretable Clustering: A Survey

Lianyu Hu, Mudi Jiang, Junjie Dong, Xinying Liu, Zengyou He

In recent years, much of the research on clustering algorithms has primarily focused on enhancing their accuracy and efficiency, frequently at the expense of interpretability. However, as these methods are increasingly being applied in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, finance, and autonomous systems, the need for transparent and interpretable clustering outcomes has become a critical concern. This is not only necessary for gaining user trust but also for satisfying the growing ethical and regulatory demands in these fields. Ensuring that decisions derived from clustering algorithms can be clearly understood and justified is now a fundamental requirement. To address this need, this paper provides a comprehensive and structured review of the current state of explainable clustering algorithms, identifying key criteria to distinguish between various methods. These insights can effectively assist researchers in making informed decisions about the most suitable explainable clustering methods for specific application contexts, while also promoting the development and adoption of clustering algorithms that are both efficient and transparent.

Read more

9/4/2024

🎯

Total Score

0

DCSI -- An improved measure of cluster separability based on separation and connectedness

Jana Gauss, Fabian Scheipl, Moritz Herrmann

Whether class labels in a given data set correspond to meaningful clusters is crucial for the evaluation of clustering algorithms using real-world data sets. This property can be quantified by separability measures. The central aspects of separability for density-based clustering are between-class separation and within-class connectedness, and neither classification-based complexity measures nor cluster validity indices (CVIs) adequately incorporate them. A newly developed measure (density cluster separability index, DCSI) aims to quantify these two characteristics and can also be used as a CVI. Extensive experiments on synthetic data indicate that DCSI correlates strongly with the performance of DBSCAN measured via the adjusted Rand index (ARI) but lacks robustness when it comes to multi-class data sets with overlapping classes that are ill-suited for density-based hard clustering. Detailed evaluation on frequently used real-world data sets shows that DCSI can correctly identify touching or overlapping classes that do not correspond to meaningful density-based clusters.

Read more

7/2/2024

Contrastive explainable clustering with differential privacy
Total Score

0

Contrastive explainable clustering with differential privacy

Dung Nguyen, Ariel Vetzler, Sarit Kraus, Anil Vullikanti

This paper presents a novel approach in Explainable AI (XAI), integrating contrastive explanations with differential privacy in clustering methods. For several basic clustering problems, including $k$-median and $k$-means, we give efficient differential private contrastive explanations that achieve essentially the same explanations as those that non-private clustering explanations can obtain. We define contrastive explanations as the utility difference between the original clustering utility and utility from clustering with a specifically fixed centroid. In each contrastive scenario, we designate a specific data point as the fixed centroid position, enabling us to measure the impact of this constraint on clustering utility under differential privacy. Extensive experiments across various datasets show our method's effectiveness in providing meaningful explanations without significantly compromising data privacy or clustering utility. This underscores our contribution to privacy-aware machine learning, demonstrating the feasibility of achieving a balance between privacy and utility in the explanation of clustering tasks.

Read more

6/10/2024