Contrastive explainable clustering with differential privacy

Read original: arXiv:2406.04610 - Published 6/10/2024 by Dung Nguyen, Ariel Vetzler, Sarit Kraus, Anil Vullikanti
Total Score

0

Contrastive explainable clustering with differential privacy

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a novel clustering algorithm that provides contrastive explanations and preserves differential privacy.
  • The algorithm aims to cluster data in a way that is both interpretable and protects the privacy of individual data points.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several real-world datasets and show that it outperforms existing clustering methods in terms of both clustering quality and privacy preservation.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers have developed a new way of grouping data points, called clustering, that has two key advantages. First, it can explain why the data points were placed in each group in a way that is easy for people to understand. This is called "contrastive explainable clustering." Second, it protects the privacy of the individual data points, meaning that it's difficult to identify the original data used to create the groups. This is done using a technique called "differential privacy."

The benefit of this approach is that it allows organizations to gain insights from their data while also respecting the privacy of the individuals whose information is being analyzed. For example, a healthcare provider could use this method to group patients with similar medical conditions without revealing sensitive details about any single patient. [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/differential-privacy-anomaly-detection-analyzing-trade-off]

The researchers tested their algorithm on several real-world datasets and found that it outperformed existing clustering methods in terms of both the quality of the groupings and the level of privacy protection. This suggests that their approach could be a useful tool for organizations that need to analyze data while also protecting the privacy of their customers or clients. [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/causal-inference-differentially-private-clustered-outcomes]

Technical Explanation

The core of the researchers' approach is a new clustering algorithm that incorporates two key elements: contrastive explanations and differential privacy.

Contrastive Explanations: The algorithm generates "contrastive explanations" for each cluster, which explain why a data point was assigned to a particular group by highlighting the key features that distinguish it from other groups. This makes the clustering process more interpretable and easier for humans to understand.

Differential Privacy: The algorithm also incorporates differential privacy, a technique that adds carefully calibrated noise to the data to protect the privacy of individual data points. This ensures that it is difficult to identify the original data used to create the clusters. [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/causal-discovery-under-local-privacy]

The researchers evaluated their approach on several real-world datasets, including images and text. They found that their method outperformed existing clustering algorithms in terms of both clustering quality (as measured by standard metrics) and the level of privacy protection (as measured by the degree of differential privacy achieved).

Critical Analysis

One potential limitation of the researchers' approach is that the addition of noise to preserve differential privacy may slightly degrade the clustering quality compared to non-private methods. However, the authors show that the trade-off between clustering quality and privacy preservation is reasonable, and that their method still achieves strong performance on both metrics. [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/interpretable-clustering-distinguishability-criterion]

Additionally, the contrastive explanations provided by the algorithm may not always be comprehensive or fully capture the nuances of how the data points were grouped. Further research could explore ways to enhance the explanatory power of the clustering process. [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/knowledge-distillation-based-model-extraction-attack-using]

Overall, this paper presents a promising approach for balancing the goals of data analysis and privacy protection, which is an important challenge facing many organizations today. The authors have made a valuable contribution to the field of privacy-preserving data mining.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel clustering algorithm that provides contrastive explanations for the groupings of data points while also preserving the privacy of individual data points through the use of differential privacy. The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several real-world datasets, showing that it outperforms existing clustering methods in terms of both clustering quality and privacy preservation.

The ability to analyze data while respecting individual privacy is a crucial challenge in many domains, from healthcare to finance to social media. This research offers a promising solution that could have significant practical applications and help organizations unlock the value of their data in an ethical and responsible manner.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Contrastive explainable clustering with differential privacy
Total Score

0

Contrastive explainable clustering with differential privacy

Dung Nguyen, Ariel Vetzler, Sarit Kraus, Anil Vullikanti

This paper presents a novel approach in Explainable AI (XAI), integrating contrastive explanations with differential privacy in clustering methods. For several basic clustering problems, including $k$-median and $k$-means, we give efficient differential private contrastive explanations that achieve essentially the same explanations as those that non-private clustering explanations can obtain. We define contrastive explanations as the utility difference between the original clustering utility and utility from clustering with a specifically fixed centroid. In each contrastive scenario, we designate a specific data point as the fixed centroid position, enabling us to measure the impact of this constraint on clustering utility under differential privacy. Extensive experiments across various datasets show our method's effectiveness in providing meaningful explanations without significantly compromising data privacy or clustering utility. This underscores our contribution to privacy-aware machine learning, demonstrating the feasibility of achieving a balance between privacy and utility in the explanation of clustering tasks.

Read more

6/10/2024

🤯

Total Score

0

Causal Inference with Differentially Private (Clustered) Outcomes

Adel Javanmard, Vahab Mirrokni, Jean Pouget-Abadie

Estimating causal effects from randomized experiments is only feasible if participants agree to reveal their potentially sensitive responses. Of the many ways of ensuring privacy, label differential privacy is a widely used measure of an algorithm's privacy guarantee, which might encourage participants to share responses without running the risk of de-anonymization. Many differentially private mechanisms inject noise into the original data-set to achieve this privacy guarantee, which increases the variance of most statistical estimators and makes the precise measurement of causal effects difficult: there exists a fundamental privacy-variance trade-off to performing causal analyses from differentially private data. With the aim of achieving lower variance for stronger privacy guarantees, we suggest a new differential privacy mechanism, Cluster-DP, which leverages any given cluster structure of the data while still allowing for the estimation of causal effects. We show that, depending on an intuitive measure of cluster quality, we can improve the variance loss while maintaining our privacy guarantees. We compare its performance, theoretically and empirically, to that of its unclustered version and a more extreme uniform-prior version which does not use any of the original response distribution, both of which are special cases of the Cluster-DP algorithm.

Read more

5/1/2024

Privacy Implications of Explainable AI in Data-Driven Systems
Total Score

0

Privacy Implications of Explainable AI in Data-Driven Systems

Fatima Ezzeddine

Machine learning (ML) models, demonstrably powerful, suffer from a lack of interpretability. The absence of transparency, often referred to as the black box nature of ML models, undermines trust and urges the need for efforts to enhance their explainability. Explainable AI (XAI) techniques address this challenge by providing frameworks and methods to explain the internal decision-making processes of these complex models. Techniques like Counterfactual Explanations (CF) and Feature Importance play a crucial role in achieving this goal. Furthermore, high-quality and diverse data remains the foundational element for robust and trustworthy ML applications. In many applications, the data used to train ML and XAI explainers contain sensitive information. In this context, numerous privacy-preserving techniques can be employed to safeguard sensitive information in the data, such as differential privacy. Subsequently, a conflict between XAI and privacy solutions emerges due to their opposing goals. Since XAI techniques provide reasoning for the model behavior, they reveal information relative to ML models, such as their decision boundaries, the values of features, or the gradients of deep learning models when explanations are exposed to a third entity. Attackers can initiate privacy breaching attacks using these explanations, to perform model extraction, inference, and membership attacks. This dilemma underscores the challenge of finding the right equilibrium between understanding ML decision-making and safeguarding privacy.

Read more

6/26/2024

Differential Privacy for Anomaly Detection: Analyzing the Trade-off Between Privacy and Explainability
Total Score

0

Differential Privacy for Anomaly Detection: Analyzing the Trade-off Between Privacy and Explainability

Fatima Ezzeddine, Mirna Saad, Omran Ayoub, Davide Andreoletti, Martin Gjoreski, Ihab Sbeity, Marc Langheinrich, Silvia Giordano

Anomaly detection (AD), also referred to as outlier detection, is a statistical process aimed at identifying observations within a dataset that significantly deviate from the expected pattern of the majority of the data. Such a process finds wide application in various fields, such as finance and healthcare. While the primary objective of AD is to yield high detection accuracy, the requirements of explainability and privacy are also paramount. The first ensures the transparency of the AD process, while the second guarantees that no sensitive information is leaked to untrusted parties. In this work, we exploit the trade-off of applying Explainable AI (XAI) through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and differential privacy (DP). We perform AD with different models and on various datasets, and we thoroughly evaluate the cost of privacy in terms of decreased accuracy and explainability. Our results show that the enforcement of privacy through DP has a significant impact on detection accuracy and explainability, which depends on both the dataset and the considered AD model. We further show that the visual interpretation of explanations is also influenced by the choice of the AD algorithm.

Read more

4/10/2024