Intrinsic Bayesian Cram'er-Rao Bound with an Application to Covariance Matrix Estimation

Overview

• This paper presents a new performance bound for estimation problems where the parameter to estimate lies in a Riemannian manifold.
• The Riemannian metric induces a geometry for the parameter manifold and an intrinsic notion of the estimation error measure.
• The result is an extension of the intrinsic Cramér-Rao bound to the Bayesian estimation framework or a generalization of the Van-Trees inequality that accounts for the geometric structures.
• The paper also studies the problem of covariance matrix estimation when the data follow a Gaussian distribution, and the covariance matrix is drawn from an inverse Wishart distribution.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new way to measure the accuracy of parameter estimates when the parameter being estimated exists in a geometric space known as a Riemannian manifold. This geometric space has a special "distance" metric that captures the natural relationships between the parameters.

Traditionally, performance bounds for parameter estimation, like the Cramér-Rao bound, have been derived for the case where the parameter is a fixed, unknown value. This paper extends those bounds to the Bayesian setting, where the parameter is assumed to follow a probability distribution. It also shows how to generalize the Van-Trees inequality, another performance bound, to work with the Riemannian geometry.

As an example, the paper looks at the problem of estimating the covariance matrix of a Gaussian distribution, where the covariance matrix itself is drawn from an inverse Wishart distribution. It compares the performance of different estimators using both the standard Euclidean distance and the natural Riemannian distance for the space of covariance matrices. The Riemannian distance reveals interesting properties of the estimators that are not captured by the Euclidean distance.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a new Bayesian Cramér-Rao bound for estimation problems where the parameter to estimate lies in a Riemannian manifold. This bound generalizes the intrinsic Cramér-Rao bound, which was previously developed for the non-Bayesian case, to the Bayesian setting.

Alternatively, the result can be seen as a generalization of the Van-Trees inequality that incorporates the geometric structure of the parameter manifold. The Riemannian metric defines the intrinsic notion of estimation error, which is different from the standard Euclidean distance.

To illustrate the framework, the paper studies the problem of covariance matrix estimation when the data follow a Gaussian distribution, and the covariance matrix is drawn from an inverse Wishart distribution. Performance bounds are derived for both the mean squared error (Euclidean metric) and the natural Riemannian distance for Hermitian positive definite matrices (affine invariant metric).

The numerical simulations show that assessing the error with the affine invariant Riemannian metric reveals interesting properties of the maximum a posteriori and minimum mean square error estimators that are not observed when using the Euclidean metric. This highlights the importance of accounting for the underlying geometry of the parameter space when analyzing estimation performance.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a valuable contribution by extending the Cramér-Rao and Van-Trees bounds to the Riemannian manifold setting, which is important for many real-world estimation problems where the parameters exhibit intrinsic geometric structure. However, the paper does not discuss the potential challenges in computing these Riemannian bounds in practice, especially for complex manifolds.

Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the utility of the Riemannian framework for covariance matrix estimation, it would be helpful to see more examples of how this approach can be applied to other estimation problems on Riemannian manifolds. The paper could also benefit from a more in-depth discussion of the limitations of the proposed bounds and potential areas for future research, such as optimization techniques on Riemannian manifolds or Mahalanobis-based metric learning.

Conclusion

This paper presents a new framework for deriving performance bounds for estimation problems on Riemannian manifolds, which is an important advancement in the field of statistical signal processing and machine learning. By accounting for the underlying geometric structure of the parameter space, the Riemannian bounds can provide deeper insights into the properties of different estimators and guide the development of more effective algorithms for a wide range of applications.