Introduction to Online Nonstochastic Control

Read original: arXiv:2211.09619 - Published 7/22/2024 by Elad Hazan, Karan Singh
Total Score

0

📶

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a new paradigm called "online nonstochastic control" for controlling dynamic systems.
  • It applies techniques from online convex optimization and convex relaxations to develop new control methods with provable guarantees.
  • The key difference is the objective - instead of aiming to perform as well as an offline optimal strategy, the goal is to minimize regret against the best policy in hindsight.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses an emerging approach to controlling dynamic systems called online nonstochastic control. Traditional control methods like optimal control and robust control focus on performing as well as the best possible strategy that could be designed offline.

In contrast, online nonstochastic control has a different goal. The cost functions and model perturbations are chosen by an adversary, so there is no pre-defined optimal policy. Instead, the aim is to do well compared to the best policy that could be identified in hindsight, using a technique called online convex optimization.

This shift in objective allows the use of iterative optimization algorithms that come with mathematical guarantees on regret (how much worse the method performs compared to the best hindsight policy) and computational complexity.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a new paradigm called "online nonstochastic control" for controlling dynamical systems. This approach borrows techniques from the field of online convex optimization and applies them to classical control settings like optimal control and robust control.

The key distinction is the objective function. Traditional control methods aim to perform comparably to an offline optimal strategy, assuming the presence of stochastic noise. In online nonstochastic control, both the cost functions and the perturbations from the assumed dynamical model are chosen adversarially. This means there is no pre-defined optimal policy; instead, the goal is to achieve low regret against the best policy that could be identified in hindsight from a benchmark class.

By framing the problem in this way, the authors are able to leverage techniques from online convex optimization, such as iterative mathematical optimization algorithms. These methods come with theoretical guarantees on regret and computational complexity, providing a principled approach to control in adversarial settings.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising perspective on control of dynamical systems. By shifting the objective from matching an offline optimal strategy to minimizing regret against the best hindsight policy, the authors open the door to new algorithmic approaches with stronger theoretical guarantees.

However, the practical applicability of this framework may be limited by the assumption of adversarial perturbations. In many real-world control settings, the disturbances may not be chosen in such a malicious manner. Additionally, the paper does not explore how the proposed methods would scale to high-dimensional or continuous-time systems, which are common in practical control applications.

Further research would be needed to understand the tradeoffs between the theoretical benefits of online nonstochastic control and its ability to handle realistic control problems. Experimental validation on benchmark control tasks could also help assess the practical viability of this approach.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a new paradigm called "online nonstochastic control" that applies techniques from online convex optimization to classical control settings. By shifting the objective from matching an offline optimal strategy to minimizing regret against the best hindsight policy, the authors develop a principled framework with provable guarantees on regret and computational complexity.

While the theoretical foundations of this approach are promising, further research is needed to understand its practical applicability, especially in high-dimensional or continuous-time control problems. Experimental evaluation and comparison to existing control methods would help clarify the strengths and limitations of online nonstochastic control.

Overall, this work represents an intriguing new direction in the control of dynamical systems, with the potential to spur further advances in this important field.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📶

Total Score

0

Introduction to Online Nonstochastic Control

Elad Hazan, Karan Singh

This text presents an introduction to an emerging paradigm in control of dynamical systems and differentiable reinforcement learning called online nonstochastic control. The new approach applies techniques from online convex optimization and convex relaxations to obtain new methods with provable guarantees for classical settings in optimal and robust control. The primary distinction between online nonstochastic control and other frameworks is the objective. In optimal control, robust control, and other control methodologies that assume stochastic noise, the goal is to perform comparably to an offline optimal strategy. In online nonstochastic control, both the cost functions as well as the perturbations from the assumed dynamical model are chosen by an adversary. Thus the optimal policy is not defined a priori. Rather, the target is to attain low regret against the best policy in hindsight from a benchmark class of policies. This objective suggests the use of the decision making framework of online convex optimization as an algorithmic methodology. The resulting methods are based on iterative mathematical optimization algorithms, and are accompanied by finite-time regret and computational complexity guarantees.

Read more

7/22/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Online Stackelberg Optimization via Nonlinear Control

William Brown, Christos Papadimitriou, Tim Roughgarden

In repeated interaction problems with adaptive agents, our objective often requires anticipating and optimizing over the space of possible agent responses. We show that many problems of this form can be cast as instances of online (nonlinear) control which satisfy textit{local controllability}, with convex losses over a bounded state space which encodes agent behavior, and we introduce a unified algorithmic framework for tractable regret minimization in such cases. When the instance dynamics are known but otherwise arbitrary, we obtain oracle-efficient $O(sqrt{T})$ regret by reduction to online convex optimization, which can be made computationally efficient if dynamics are locally textit{action-linear}. In the presence of adversarial disturbances to the state, we give tight bounds in terms of either the cumulative or per-round disturbance magnitude (for textit{strongly} or textit{weakly} locally controllable dynamics, respectively). Additionally, we give sublinear regret results for the cases of unknown locally action-linear dynamics as well as for the bandit feedback setting. Finally, we demonstrate applications of our framework to well-studied problems including performative prediction, recommendations for adaptive agents, adaptive pricing of real-valued goods, and repeated gameplay against no-regret learners, directly yielding extensions beyond prior results in each case.

Read more

6/28/2024

Adaptive Online Non-stochastic Control
Total Score

0

Adaptive Online Non-stochastic Control

Naram Mhaisen, George Iosifidis

We tackle the problem of Non-stochastic Control (NSC) with the aim of obtaining algorithms whose policy regret is proportional to the difficulty of the controlled environment. Namely, we tailor the Follow The Regularized Leader (FTRL) framework to dynamical systems by using regularizers that are proportional to the actual witnessed costs. The main challenge arises from using the proposed adaptive regularizers in the presence of a state, or equivalently, a memory, which couples the effect of the online decisions and requires new tools for bounding the regret. Via new analysis techniques for NSC and FTRL integration, we obtain novel disturbance action controllers (DAC) with sub-linear data adaptive policy regret bounds that shrink when the trajectory of costs has small gradients, while staying sub-linear even in the worst case.

Read more

4/24/2024

Stochastic Online Optimization for Cyber-Physical and Robotic Systems
Total Score

0

Stochastic Online Optimization for Cyber-Physical and Robotic Systems

Hao Ma, Melanie Zeilinger, Michael Muehlebach

We propose a novel gradient-based online optimization framework for solving stochastic programming problems that frequently arise in the context of cyber-physical and robotic systems. Our problem formulation accommodates constraints that model the evolution of a cyber-physical system, which has, in general, a continuous state and action space, is nonlinear, and where the state is only partially observed. We also incorporate an approximate model of the dynamics as prior knowledge into the learning process and show that even rough estimates of the dynamics can significantly improve the convergence of our algorithms. Our online optimization framework encompasses both gradient descent and quasi-Newton methods, and we provide a unified convergence analysis of our algorithms in a non-convex setting. We also characterize the impact of modeling errors in the system dynamics on the convergence rate of the algorithms. Finally, we evaluate our algorithms in simulations of a flexible beam, a four-legged walking robot, and in real-world experiments with a ping-pong playing robot.

Read more

4/9/2024