Online Optimization Perspective on First-Order and Zero-Order Decentralized Nonsmooth Nonconvex Stochastic Optimization
2406.01484
0
0
Abstract
We investigate the finite-time analysis of finding ($delta,epsilon$)-stationary points for nonsmooth nonconvex objectives in decentralized stochastic optimization. A set of agents aim at minimizing a global function using only their local information by interacting over a network. We present a novel algorithm, called Multi Epoch Decentralized Online Learning (ME-DOL), for which we establish the sample complexity in various settings. First, using a recently proposed online-to-nonconvex technique, we show that our algorithm recovers the optimal convergence rate of smooth nonconvex objectives. We then extend our analysis to the nonsmooth setting, building on properties of randomized smoothing and Goldstein-subdifferential sets. We establish the sample complexity of $O(delta^{-1}epsilon^{-3})$, which to the best of our knowledge is the first finite-time guarantee for decentralized nonsmooth nonconvex stochastic optimization in the first-order setting (without weak-convexity), matching its optimal centralized counterpart. We further prove the same rate for the zero-order oracle setting without using variance reduction.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents an online optimization perspective on first-order and zero-order decentralized nonsmooth nonconvex stochastic optimization.
- It explores different algorithms and their theoretical guarantees for solving these types of optimization problems in a decentralized setting.
- The paper covers both first-order methods, which use gradient information, and zero-order methods, which only have access to function values.
- It also considers the impact of nonsmoothness and nonconvexity on the algorithms' performance.
Plain English Explanation
This research paper looks at the problem of decentralized optimization - where multiple agents (e.g., computers, robots) work together to find the best solution to a problem, without a central coordinator.
The specific type of problem the paper focuses on is "nonsmooth nonconvex stochastic optimization". This means the objective function being optimized is not smooth (it has sharp edges or corners) and not convex (it has multiple local minima), and there is some randomness or uncertainty involved.
The paper compares two main approaches to solving this problem in a decentralized setting:
-
First-order methods: These methods use information about the gradient (the slope) of the objective function to guide the optimization process. They require more information about the function, but can often converge faster.
-
Zero-order methods: These methods only use the function values themselves, without any gradient information. They are more flexible but may take longer to converge.
The paper analyzes the theoretical performance of these different algorithms, looking at factors like how quickly they can find a good solution and how their performance scales with the problem size. It provides insights that can help researchers and practitioners choose the most appropriate optimization approach for their specific decentralized, nonsmooth, nonconvex, stochastic problem.
Technical Explanation
The paper An Online Optimization Perspective on First-Order and Zero-Order Decentralized Nonsmooth Nonconvex Stochastic Optimization considers the problem of decentralized optimization in the presence of nonsmoothness, nonconvexity, and stochasticity.
The authors propose and analyze several first-order and zero-order algorithms for solving this problem. First-order methods use gradient information, while zero-order methods only rely on function value feedback. The paper provides theoretical guarantees on the convergence rate and dimension dependence of these algorithms.
For the first-order case, the authors develop a decentralized variant of the proximal gradient method and show that it can achieve an optimal convergence rate. For the zero-order case, they design a novel zeroth-order feedback-based method and prove that it has optimal dimension dependence.
The key insights from this technical work are:
- Decentralized optimization can be effectively tackled using both first-order and zero-order methods, with different tradeoffs in terms of convergence speed and information requirements.
- Carefully designed algorithms can provably achieve state-of-the-art performance even in the challenging setting of nonsmooth, nonconvex, stochastic optimization.
- The paper provides a unifying online optimization framework for analyzing these problems, which can lead to further advancements in the field.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thorough theoretical analysis of first-order and zero-order algorithms for decentralized nonsmooth nonconvex stochastic optimization. The authors have made significant contributions by developing new algorithms and providing strong convergence guarantees.
However, as with any theoretical work, there are some limitations that should be considered:
-
Assumptions: The analysis relies on several assumptions, such as the objective function satisfying certain smoothness and boundedness properties. In practice, these assumptions may not always hold, and the algorithms' performance may differ.
-
Practical Considerations: While the theoretical results are compelling, the paper does not provide much insight into the practical implementation of these algorithms or how they would perform on real-world problems. Further empirical evaluation would be necessary to fully assess their utility.
-
Comparison to Alternatives: The paper mainly focuses on its own proposed algorithms and does not provide a comprehensive comparison to other state-of-the-art methods for decentralized nonsmooth nonconvex optimization. Such a comparative analysis would help readers better understand the strengths and limitations of the presented approaches.
-
Generalization: The paper's scope is limited to the specific problem of decentralized nonsmooth nonconvex stochastic optimization. It would be interesting to see if the techniques developed here can be extended to other related optimization problems or applied in a wider range of applications.
Overall, this research makes valuable contributions to the field of decentralized optimization, but further work is needed to fully assess the practical implications and broader applicability of the proposed methods.
Conclusion
This paper presents an in-depth analysis of first-order and zero-order algorithms for solving decentralized nonsmooth nonconvex stochastic optimization problems. The key takeaways are:
- Both gradient-based and gradient-free methods can be effective in this challenging setting, with different tradeoffs in terms of convergence speed and information requirements.
- The authors have developed new algorithms with strong theoretical guarantees, pushing the state-of-the-art in this area of decentralized optimization.
- The paper provides a unified online optimization framework for analyzing these problems, which can inform future research and enable further advancements in the field.
While the theoretical results are promising, more work is needed to assess the practical applicability of these methods and how they compare to alternative approaches. Nonetheless, this research represents an important contribution to the ongoing efforts to solve complex optimization problems in a decentralized, nonsmooth, and nonconvex setting.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔍
An Algorithm with Optimal Dimension-Dependence for Zero-Order Nonsmooth Nonconvex Stochastic Optimization
Guy Kornowski, Ohad Shamir
0
0
We study the complexity of producing $(delta,epsilon)$-stationary points of Lipschitz objectives which are possibly neither smooth nor convex, using only noisy function evaluations. Recent works proposed several stochastic zero-order algorithms that solve this task, all of which suffer from a dimension-dependence of $Omega(d^{3/2})$ where $d$ is the dimension of the problem, which was conjectured to be optimal. We refute this conjecture by providing a faster algorithm that has complexity $O(ddelta^{-1}epsilon^{-3})$, which is optimal (up to numerical constants) with respect to $d$ and also optimal with respect to the accuracy parameters $delta,epsilon$, thus solving an open question due to Lin et al. (NeurIPS'22). Moreover, the convergence rate achieved by our algorithm is also optimal for smooth objectives, proving that in the nonconvex stochastic zero-order setting, nonsmooth optimization is as easy as smooth optimization. We provide algorithms that achieve the aforementioned convergence rate in expectation as well as with high probability. Our analysis is based on a simple yet powerful lemma regarding the Goldstein-subdifferential set, which allows utilizing recent advancements in first-order nonsmooth nonconvex optimization.
4/16/2024
🛠️
Faster Gradient-Free Algorithms for Nonsmooth Nonconvex Stochastic Optimization
Lesi Chen, Jing Xu, Luo Luo
0
0
We consider the optimization problem of the form $min_{x in mathbb{R}^d} f(x) triangleq mathbb{E}_{xi} [F(x; xi)]$, where the component $F(x;xi)$ is $L$-mean-squared Lipschitz but possibly nonconvex and nonsmooth. The recently proposed gradient-free method requires at most $mathcal{O}( L^4 d^{3/2} epsilon^{-4} + Delta L^3 d^{3/2} delta^{-1} epsilon^{-4})$ stochastic zeroth-order oracle complexity to find a $(delta,epsilon)$-Goldstein stationary point of objective function, where $Delta = f(x_0) - inf_{x in mathbb{R}^d} f(x)$ and $x_0$ is the initial point of the algorithm. This paper proposes a more efficient algorithm using stochastic recursive gradient estimators, which improves the complexity to $mathcal{O}(L^3 d^{3/2} epsilon^{-3}+ Delta L^2 d^{3/2} delta^{-1} epsilon^{-3})$.
5/15/2024
🛠️
Private Zeroth-Order Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization
Qinzi Zhang, Hoang Tran, Ashok Cutkosky
0
0
We introduce a new zeroth-order algorithm for private stochastic optimization on nonconvex and nonsmooth objectives. Given a dataset of size $M$, our algorithm ensures $(alpha,alpharho^2/2)$-R'enyi differential privacy and finds a $(delta,epsilon)$-stationary point so long as $M=tildeOmegaleft(frac{d}{deltaepsilon^3} + frac{d^{3/2}}{rhodeltaepsilon^2}right)$. This matches the optimal complexity of its non-private zeroth-order analog. Notably, although the objective is not smooth, we have privacy ``for free'' whenever $rho ge sqrt{d}epsilon$.
7/1/2024
🛠️
Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithms for Non-Smooth Convex Decentralized Optimization over Time-Varying Networks
Dmitry Kovalev, Ekaterina Borodich, Alexander Gasnikov, Dmitrii Feoktistov
0
0
We consider the task of minimizing the sum of convex functions stored in a decentralized manner across the nodes of a communication network. This problem is relatively well-studied in the scenario when the objective functions are smooth, or the links of the network are fixed in time, or both. In particular, lower bounds on the number of decentralized communications and (sub)gradient computations required to solve the problem have been established, along with matching optimal algorithms. However, the remaining and most challenging setting of non-smooth decentralized optimization over time-varying networks is largely underexplored, as neither lower bounds nor optimal algorithms are known in the literature. We resolve this fundamental gap with the following contributions: (i) we establish the first lower bounds on the communication and subgradient computation complexities of solving non-smooth convex decentralized optimization problems over time-varying networks; (ii) we develop the first optimal algorithm that matches these lower bounds and offers substantially improved theoretical performance compared to the existing state of the art.
5/29/2024