Inverse-Q*: Token Level Reinforcement Learning for Aligning Large Language Models Without Preference Data
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces "Inverse-Q*," a token-level reinforcement learning approach for aligning large language models (LLMs) without requiring preference data.
- The goal is to train LLMs to generate text that aligns with human preferences, without needing to explicitly collect preference data.
- The approach uses a novel "inverse Q-learning" technique to learn a reward function directly from interactions with the language model.
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a new way to train large language models (like GPT-3) to generate text that aligns with what humans prefer, without the need to explicitly collect data on human preferences. This is an important problem because as language models become more powerful, it's crucial that they produce output that is beneficial and aligned with human values.
The key idea is to use a technique called "inverse Q-learning" to learn a reward function directly from interacting with the language model. Essentially, the system tries to figure out what kind of text the model should be producing by observing its behavior and "reversing" the reward function. This allows the system to train the model to generate preferred text without having to manually specify what that preferred text should be.
The paper explains the technical details of how this inverse Q-learning approach works and demonstrates its effectiveness on some example tasks. The key advantage is that it can align language models with human preferences without requiring the costly and difficult process of collecting explicit preference data.
Technical Explanation
The Inverse-Q* method works by learning a reward function directly from interactions with the language model, using a technique called "inverse Q-learning."
The core idea is to start with a language model that has been pre-trained on a large corpus of text. The system then interacts with this model, observing the tokens it generates and keeping track of the "value" or "quality" of the resulting text. By analyzing these observations, the system can work backwards to infer the underlying reward function that the language model is optimizing for.
Once this reward function is learned, the system can then use reinforcement learning to fine-tune the language model, guiding it to generate text that maximizes this inferred reward. This aligns the model's outputs with the preferences captured by the learned reward function, without requiring any explicit preference data.
The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach on a variety of tasks, showing that Inverse-Q* can align language models with human preferences more efficiently than alternative techniques.
Critical Analysis
The Inverse-Q* approach is a promising step towards aligning large language models with human values, but it does have some potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
The learned reward function may not fully capture all nuances of human preferences, and could potentially miss important aspects or introduce biases. Further work is needed to ensure the inferred rewards align well with broad human values.
-
The technique relies on being able to effectively interact with the language model and observe the "quality" of its outputs. This may be challenging in practice, especially for more open-ended language generation tasks.
-
The paper focuses on alignment at the token level, but aligning language models with higher-level semantic and pragmatic aspects of human preferences remains an open challenge.
-
The approach assumes access to a pre-trained language model. Scaling this to train models from scratch, or to adapt it to different model architectures, may require additional research.
Overall, the Inverse-Q* method is an important step forward, but continued work will be needed to fully realize the goal of reliably aligning powerful language models with human values and preferences.
Conclusion
The Inverse-Q* paper introduces a novel token-level reinforcement learning approach for aligning large language models with human preferences, without requiring the collection of explicit preference data.
By using an "inverse Q-learning" technique to infer the underlying reward function driving the language model's behavior, the system can fine-tune the model to generate text that better matches human values and priorities. This has significant implications for the safe and beneficial deployment of powerful language models in real-world applications.
While the Inverse-Q* method shows promise, there are still important challenges and limitations that need to be addressed through further research. Ongoing work in this area will be crucial as language models continue to grow in capability and influence.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Inverse-Q*: Token Level Reinforcement Learning for Aligning Large Language Models Without Preference Data
Han Xia, Songyang Gao, Qiming Ge, Zhiheng Xi, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has proven effective in aligning large language models with human intentions, yet it often relies on complex methodologies like Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) that require extensive hyper-parameter tuning and present challenges in sample efficiency and stability. In this paper, we introduce Inverse-Q*, an innovative framework that transcends traditional RL methods by optimizing token-level reinforcement learning without the need for additional reward or value models. Inverse-Q* leverages direct preference optimization techniques but extends them by estimating the conditionally optimal policy directly from the model's responses, facilitating more granular and flexible policy shaping. Our approach reduces reliance on human annotation and external supervision, making it especially suitable for low-resource settings. We present extensive experimental results demonstrating that Inverse-Q* not only matches but potentially exceeds the effectiveness of PPO in terms of convergence speed and the alignment of model responses with human preferences. Our findings suggest that Inverse-Q* offers a practical and robust alternative to conventional RLHF approaches, paving the way for more efficient and adaptable model training approaches.
Read more8/30/2024
1
From $r$ to $Q^*$: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Function
Rafael Rafailov, Joey Hejna, Ryan Park, Chelsea Finn
Reinforcement Learning From Human Feedback (RLHF) has been critical to the success of the latest generation of generative AI models. In response to the complex nature of the classical RLHF pipeline, direct alignment algorithms such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) have emerged as an alternative approach. Although DPO solves the same objective as the standard RLHF setup, there is a mismatch between the two approaches. Standard RLHF deploys reinforcement learning in a specific token-level MDP, while DPO is derived as a bandit problem in which the whole response of the model is treated as a single arm. In this work we rectify this difference. We theoretically show that we can derive DPO in the token-level MDP as a general inverse Q-learning algorithm, which satisfies the Bellman equation. Using our theoretical results, we provide three concrete empirical insights. First, we show that because of its token level interpretation, DPO is able to perform some type of credit assignment. Next, we prove that under the token level formulation, classical search-based algorithms, such as MCTS, which have recently been applied to the language generation space, are equivalent to likelihood-based search on a DPO policy. Empirically we show that a simple beam search yields meaningful improvement over the base DPO policy. Finally, we show how the choice of reference policy causes implicit rewards to decline during training. We conclude by discussing applications of our work, including information elicitation in multi-turn dialogue, reasoning, agentic applications and end-to-end training of multi-model systems.
Read more8/14/2024
0
Direct Alignment of Language Models via Quality-Aware Self-Refinement
Runsheng Yu, Yong Wang, Xiaoqi Jiao, Youzhi Zhang, James T. Kwok
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has been commonly used to align the behaviors of Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences. Recently, a popular alternative is Direct Policy Optimization (DPO), which replaces an LLM-based reward model with the policy itself, thus obviating the need for extra memory and training time to learn the reward model. However, DPO does not consider the relative qualities of the positive and negative responses, and can lead to sub-optimal training outcomes. To alleviate this problem, we investigate the use of intrinsic knowledge within the on-the-fly fine-tuning LLM to obtain relative qualities and help to refine the loss function. Specifically, we leverage the knowledge of the LLM to design a refinement function to estimate the quality of both the positive and negative responses. We show that the constructed refinement function can help self-refine the loss function under mild assumptions. The refinement function is integrated into DPO and its variant Identity Policy Optimization (IPO). Experiments across various evaluators indicate that they can improve the performance of the fine-tuned models over DPO and IPO.
Read more6/3/2024
๐งช
0
Exploratory Preference Optimization: Harnessing Implicit Q*-Approximation for Sample-Efficient RLHF
Tengyang Xie, Dylan J. Foster, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Corby Rosset, Ahmed Awadallah, Alexander Rakhlin
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a central tool for language model alignment. We consider online exploration in RLHF, which exploits interactive access to human or AI feedback by deliberately encouraging the model to produce diverse, maximally informative responses. By allowing RLHF to confidently stray from the pre-trained model, online exploration offers the possibility of novel, potentially super-human capabilities, but its full potential as a paradigm for language model training has yet to be realized, owing to computational and statistical bottlenecks in directly adapting existing reinforcement learning techniques. We propose a new algorithm for online exploration in RLHF, Exploratory Preference Optimization (XPO), which is simple and practical -- a one-line change to (online) Direct Preference Optimization (DPO; Rafailov et al., 2023) -- yet enjoys the strongest known provable guarantees and promising empirical performance. XPO augments the DPO objective with a novel and principled exploration bonus, empowering the algorithm to explore outside the support of the initial model and human feedback data. In theory, we show that XPO is provably sample-efficient and converges to a near-optimal language model policy under natural exploration conditions, irrespective of whether the initial model has good coverage. Our analysis, which builds on the observation that DPO implicitly performs a form of $Q^{star}$-approximation (or, Bellman error minimization), combines previously disparate techniques from language modeling and theoretical reinforcement learning in a serendipitous fashion through the perspective of KL-regularized Markov decision processes. Empirically, we find that XPO is more sample-efficient than non-exploratory DPO variants in a preliminary evaluation.
Read more6/3/2024