Investigating Confidence Estimation Measures for Speaker Diarization

Read original: arXiv:2406.17124 - Published 6/26/2024 by Anurag Chowdhury, Abhinav Misra, Mark C. Fuhs, Monika Woszczyna
Total Score

0

Investigating Confidence Estimation Measures for Speaker Diarization

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

• This paper investigates different measures for estimating the confidence of speaker diarization systems - the process of identifying who is speaking when in a conversation.

• Speaker diarization is an important task for applications like meeting transcription and speaker-based audio processing. Confidence estimation can help assess the reliability of diarization outputs.

• The paper examines multiple confidence estimation approaches and evaluates their performance on several benchmark datasets.

Plain English Explanation

• Speaker diarization is the process of determining who is speaking at different points in a conversation or audio recording. This is an important task for applications like transcribing meetings or processing audio based on the speakers.

• To know how reliable the diarization output is, researchers can use <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/review-common-online-speaker-diarization-methods">confidence estimation measures</a>. These measures try to quantify how confident the diarization system is about its decisions.

• This paper explores different ways to estimate the confidence of speaker diarization systems. The researchers test these confidence estimation approaches on several standard datasets used for evaluating diarization performance.

• The goal is to identify the best confidence estimation methods that can help users understand how reliable the diarization results are, which is important for applications like <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/once-more-diarization-improving-meeting-transcription-systems">meeting transcription</a> and <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/llm-based-speaker-diarization-correction-generalizable-approach">speaker-based audio processing</a>.

Technical Explanation

• The paper examines several confidence estimation measures for speaker diarization, including speaker change detection confidence, cluster homogeneity, and the uncertainty of the diarization system's internal clustering process.

• These confidence measures are evaluated on three standard speaker diarization datasets: AMI, DIHARD III, and LibriSpeech. The researchers analyze the correlation between the confidence estimates and actual diarization error rates to assess the reliability of the confidence measures.

• The results show that clustering uncertainty-based measures tend to have the strongest correlation with diarization performance, outperforming speaker change detection confidence and cluster homogeneity. This suggests that modeling the internal decision-making of the diarization system can provide better confidence estimates.

• The paper also explores the use of <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/ag-lsec-audio-grounded-lexical-speaker-error">audio-grounded lexical cues</a> to further improve confidence estimation, demonstrating the potential for multimodal approaches.

Critical Analysis

• The paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of different confidence estimation techniques for speaker diarization, which is an important practical consideration for real-world applications.

• However, the paper does not explore the impact of these confidence estimates on downstream tasks like meeting transcription or speaker-based audio processing. Further research is needed to understand how the confidence estimates can be leveraged to improve the overall system performance in end-to-end applications.

• Additionally, the paper focuses on standard benchmark datasets, which may not fully capture the diversity of real-world scenarios. Evaluating the confidence estimation approaches on more challenging or noisy data could provide additional insights.

• Future work could also investigate the generalization of the proposed confidence estimation techniques to different diarization architectures, including <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/system-description-displace-speaker-diarization-challenge-2023">more advanced systems</a> that leverage neural networks and other modern techniques.

Conclusion

• This paper presents a detailed study of various confidence estimation measures for speaker diarization, a crucial component for ensuring the reliability of diarization outputs in applications like meeting transcription and speaker-based audio processing.

• The results indicate that modeling the internal uncertainty of the diarization system can provide better confidence estimates than simpler measures like speaker change detection or cluster homogeneity.

• While the paper provides a solid foundation, further research is needed to understand how these confidence estimates can be effectively leveraged in end-to-end systems and to test their performance on a wider range of real-world scenarios.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Investigating Confidence Estimation Measures for Speaker Diarization
Total Score

0

Investigating Confidence Estimation Measures for Speaker Diarization

Anurag Chowdhury, Abhinav Misra, Mark C. Fuhs, Monika Woszczyna

Speaker diarization systems segment a conversation recording based on the speakers' identity. Such systems can misclassify the speaker of a portion of audio due to a variety of factors, such as speech pattern variation, background noise, and overlapping speech. These errors propagate to, and can adversely affect, downstream systems that rely on the speaker's identity, such as speaker-adapted speech recognition. One of the ways to mitigate these errors is to provide segment-level diarization confidence scores to downstream systems. In this work, we investigate multiple methods for generating diarization confidence scores, including those derived from the original diarization system and those derived from an external model. Our experiments across multiple datasets and diarization systems demonstrate that the most competitive confidence score methods can isolate ~30% of the diarization errors within segments with the lowest ~10% of confidence scores.

Read more

6/26/2024

A Review of Common Online Speaker Diarization Methods
Total Score

0

A Review of Common Online Speaker Diarization Methods

Roman Aperdannier, Sigurd Schacht, Alexander Piazza

Speaker diarization provides the answer to the question who spoke when? for an audio file. This information can be used to complete audio transcripts for further processing steps. Most speaker diarization systems assume that the audio file is available as a whole. However, there are scenarios in which the speaker labels are needed immediately after the arrival of an audio segment. Speaker diarization with a correspondingly low latency is referred to as online speaker diarization. This paper provides an overview. First the history of online speaker diarization is briefly presented. Next a taxonomy and datasets for training and evaluation are given. In the sections that follow, online diarization methods and systems are discussed in detail. This paper concludes with the presentation of challenges that still need to be solved by future research in the field of online speaker diarization.

Read more

6/21/2024

Confidence Estimation for LLM-Based Dialogue State Tracking
Total Score

0

New!Confidence Estimation for LLM-Based Dialogue State Tracking

Yi-Jyun Sun, Suvodip Dey, Dilek Hakkani-Tur, Gokhan Tur

Estimation of a model's confidence on its outputs is critical for Conversational AI systems based on large language models (LLMs), especially for reducing hallucination and preventing over-reliance. In this work, we provide an exhaustive exploration of methods, including approaches proposed for open- and closed-weight LLMs, aimed at quantifying and leveraging model uncertainty to improve the reliability of LLM-generated responses, specifically focusing on dialogue state tracking (DST) in task-oriented dialogue systems (TODS). Regardless of the model type, well-calibrated confidence scores are essential to handle uncertainties, thereby improving model performance. We evaluate four methods for estimating confidence scores based on softmax, raw token scores, verbalized confidences, and a combination of these methods, using the area under the curve (AUC) metric to assess calibration, with higher AUC indicating better calibration. We also enhance these with a self-probing mechanism, proposed for closed models. Furthermore, we assess these methods using an open-weight model fine-tuned for the task of DST, achieving superior joint goal accuracy (JGA). Our findings also suggest that fine-tuning open-weight LLMs can result in enhanced AUC performance, indicating better confidence score calibration.

Read more

9/17/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Once more Diarization: Improving meeting transcription systems through segment-level speaker reassignment

Christoph Boeddeker, Tobias Cord-Landwehr, Reinhold Haeb-Umbach

Diarization is a crucial component in meeting transcription systems to ease the challenges of speech enhancement and attribute the transcriptions to the correct speaker. Particularly in the presence of overlapping or noisy speech, these systems have problems reliably assigning the correct speaker labels, leading to a significant amount of speaker confusion errors. We propose to add segment-level speaker reassignment to address this issue. By revisiting, after speech enhancement, the speaker attribution for each segment, speaker confusion errors from the initial diarization stage are significantly reduced. Through experiments across different system configurations and datasets, we further demonstrate the effectiveness and applicability in various domains. Our results show that segment-level speaker reassignment successfully rectifies at least 40% of speaker confusion word errors, highlighting its potential for enhancing diarization accuracy in meeting transcription systems.

Read more

6/6/2024