Investigating and Designing for Trust in AI-powered Code Generation Tools
0
🛸
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines software developers' trust in AI-powered code generation tools like GitHub Copilot
- Explores challenges developers face in building appropriate trust and design concepts to address these challenges
- Aims to inform design recommendations for building trust in AI-powered code generation tools
Plain English Explanation
As AI-powered code generation tools become more popular, it's crucial to understand how software developers build trust in these AI tools. This trust is a key factor for the adoption and responsible usage of these tools. However, we don't fully grasp how developers build trust with AI, nor do we know how to design the interfaces of generative AI systems to help developers trust them appropriately.
This paper describes findings from a two-stage qualitative investigation. First, the researchers interviewed 17 developers to understand their notions of trust and the challenges they face in building appropriate trust in AI code generation tools. They found three main challenges: setting proper expectations, configuring AI tools, and validating AI suggestions.
To address these challenges, the researchers conducted a design probe study in the second stage. They explored design concepts that could support developers' trust-building process by:
- Communicating AI performance to help users set proper expectations
- Allowing users to configure the AI by setting and adjusting preferences
- Offering indicators of the AI model's mechanism to support the evaluation of AI suggestions
The researchers gathered developers' feedback on how these design concepts could help them build appropriate trust in AI-powered code generation tools, as well as potential risks in the design. These findings inform their proposed design recommendations for building trust in these AI tools.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a two-stage qualitative investigation to better understand software developers' trust in AI-powered code generation tools. In the first stage, they interviewed 17 developers to contextualize their notions of trust and identify the challenges they face in building appropriate trust in AI code generation tools.
The interviews revealed three main challenges:
- Building appropriate expectations about the capabilities and limitations of AI code generation tools
- Configuring AI tools to suit their preferences and needs
- Validating the suggestions provided by the AI
To address these challenges, the researchers conducted a design probe study in the second stage. They explored design concepts that could support developers' trust-building process, such as:
- Communicating the performance of the AI model to help users set proper expectations
- Allowing users to configure the AI by setting and adjusting preferences
- Offering indicators of the AI model's mechanism to support the evaluation of its suggestions
The researchers gathered feedback from developers on how these design concepts could help them build appropriate trust in AI-powered code generation tools, as well as potential risks in the design. These findings inform their proposed design recommendations for building trust in these AI tools.
Critical Analysis
The researchers provide valuable insights into the challenges developers face in building appropriate trust in AI-powered code generation tools. By investigating both the conceptual notions of trust and the practical design needs, the study offers a comprehensive understanding of this complex issue.
However, the study's qualitative nature and the relatively small sample size of 17 developers may limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the paper does not delve into potential biases or limitations of the AI models themselves, which could also affect developers' trust. Further research may be needed to validate the proposed design recommendations and explore their long-term effectiveness.
Despite these limitations, the study's focus on the user experience and its emphasis on addressing the specific challenges faced by developers are valuable contributions to the ongoing discussions around trust in AI-powered tools. The design concepts presented could serve as a starting point for developers and AI system designers to collaboratively work towards building more trustworthy and transparent AI-powered code generation tools.
Conclusion
This study provides important insights into software developers' trust in AI-powered code generation tools, a critical aspect of their widespread adoption and responsible usage. By identifying the key challenges developers face in building appropriate trust and exploring design concepts to address these challenges, the researchers offer valuable guidance for the development of more trustworthy AI-powered code generation tools.
As AI-powered tools continue to evolve and become more prevalent in software development, understanding and designing for trust will be crucial in ensuring that developers can leverage these technologies effectively and responsibly. The findings from this study contribute to this important ongoing discussion and pave the way for further research and innovation in this space.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🛸
0
Investigating and Designing for Trust in AI-powered Code Generation Tools
Ruotong Wang, Ruijia Cheng, Denae Ford, Thomas Zimmermann
As AI-powered code generation tools such as GitHub Copilot become popular, it is crucial to understand software developers' trust in AI tools -- a key factor for tool adoption and responsible usage. However, we know little about how developers build trust with AI, nor do we understand how to design the interface of generative AI systems to facilitate their appropriate levels of trust. In this paper, we describe findings from a two-stage qualitative investigation. We first interviewed 17 developers to contextualize their notions of trust and understand their challenges in building appropriate trust in AI code generation tools. We surfaced three main challenges -- including building appropriate expectations, configuring AI tools, and validating AI suggestions. To address these challenges, we conducted a design probe study in the second stage to explore design concepts that support developers' trust-building process by 1) communicating AI performance to help users set proper expectations, 2) allowing users to configure AI by setting and adjusting preferences, and 3) offering indicators of model mechanism to support evaluation of AI suggestions. We gathered developers' feedback on how these design concepts can help them build appropriate trust in AI-powered code generation tools, as well as potential risks in design. These findings inform our proposed design recommendations on how to design for trust in AI-powered code generation tools.
Read more5/29/2024
0
What Guides Our Choices? Modeling Developers' Trust and Behavioral Intentions Towards GenAI
Rudrajit Choudhuri, Bianca Trinkenreich, Rahul Pandita, Eirini Kalliamvakou, Igor Steinmacher, Marco Gerosa, Christopher Sanchez, Anita Sarma
Generative AI (genAI) tools, such as ChatGPT or Copilot, are advertised to improve developer productivity and are being integrated into software development. However, misaligned trust, skepticism, and usability concerns can impede the adoption of such tools. Research also indicates that AI can be exclusionary, failing to support diverse users adequately. One such aspect of diversity is cognitive diversity -- variations in users' cognitive styles -- that leads to divergence in perspectives and interaction styles. When an individual's cognitive style is unsupported, it creates barriers to technology adoption. Therefore, to understand how to effectively integrate genAI tools into software development, it is first important to model what factors affect developers' trust and intentions to adopt genAI tools in practice? We developed a theoretical model to (1) identify factors that influence developers' trust in genAI tools and (2) examine the relationship between developers' trust, cognitive styles, and their intentions to use these tools. We surveyed software developers (N=238) at two major global tech organizations and employed Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to evaluate our model. Our findings reveal that genAI's system/output quality, functional value, and goal maintenance significantly influence developers' trust in these tools. Furthermore, developers' trust and cognitive styles influence their intentions to use these tools. We offer practical suggestions for designing genAI tools for effective use and inclusive user experience.
Read more9/9/2024
➖
0
Balancing Innovation and Ethics in AI-Driven Software Development
Mohammad Baqar
This paper critically examines the ethical implications of integrating AI tools like GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT into the software development process. It explores issues such as code ownership, bias, accountability, privacy, and the potential impact on the job market. While these AI tools offer significant benefits in terms of productivity and efficiency, they also introduce complex ethical challenges. The paper argues that addressing these challenges is essential to ensuring that AI's integration into software development is both responsible and beneficial to society
Read more8/21/2024
🎲
0
Trust in AI: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions
Saleh Afroogh, Ali Akbari, Evan Malone, Mohammadali Kargar, Hananeh Alambeigi
The increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in our daily life through various applications, services, and products explains the significance of trust/distrust in AI from a user perspective. AI-driven systems (as opposed to other technologies) have ubiquitously diffused in our life not only as some beneficial tools to be used by human agents but also are going to be substitutive agents on our behalf, or manipulative minds that would influence human thought, decision, and agency. Trust/distrust in AI plays the role of a regulator and could significantly control the level of this diffusion, as trust can increase, and distrust may reduce the rate of adoption of AI. Recently, varieties of studies have paid attention to the variant dimension of trust/distrust in AI, and its relevant considerations. In this systematic literature review, after conceptualization of trust in the current AI literature review, we will investigate trust in different types of human-Machine interaction, and its impact on technology acceptance in different domains. In addition to that, we propose a taxonomy of technical (i.e., safety, accuracy, robustness) and non-technical axiological (i.e., ethical, legal, and mixed) trustworthiness metrics, and some trustworthy measurements. Moreover, we examine some major trust-breakers in AI (e.g., autonomy and dignity threat), and trust makers; and propose some future directions and probable solutions for the transition to a trustworthy AI.
Read more4/5/2024