To Trust or Not to Trust: Towards a novel approach to measure trust for XAI systems
2405.05766
0
0
🛸
Abstract
The increasing reliance on Deep Learning models, combined with their inherent lack of transparency, has spurred the development of a novel field of study known as eXplainable AI (XAI) methods. These methods seek to enhance the trust of end-users in automated systems by providing insights into the rationale behind their decisions. This paper presents a novel approach for measuring user trust in XAI systems, allowing their refinement. Our proposed metric combines both performance metrics and trust indicators from an objective perspective. To validate this novel methodology, we conducted a case study in a realistic medical scenario: the usage of XAI system for the detection of pneumonia from x-ray images.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores a novel approach for measuring user trust in eXplainable AI (XAI) systems, which aim to provide insights into the reasoning behind automated decisions.
- The proposed metric combines performance metrics and trust indicators to evaluate XAI systems from an objective perspective.
- The researchers conducted a case study in a medical scenario, using an XAI system for pneumonia detection from X-ray images, to validate their methodology.
Plain English Explanation
As deep learning models become more widely used, there is a growing need to understand how these systems make decisions. eXplainable AI (XAI) methods are designed to provide users with insights into the rationale behind automated decisions, helping to build trust in these systems.
In this paper, the researchers present a new way to measure how much users trust XAI systems. Their approach combines traditional performance metrics with indicators of user trust, providing a more comprehensive evaluation. To test their method, the researchers used an XAI system for detecting pneumonia from X-ray images, a realistic medical scenario. [This type of explainable and trustworthy AI is crucial for building confidence in AI systems, especially in high-stakes domains like healthcare.](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/mapping-potential-explainable-artificial-intelligence-xai-fairness)
Technical Explanation
The researchers developed a novel metric for evaluating user trust in XAI systems. This metric combines traditional performance measures, such as accuracy, with indicators of user trust, like how much users rely on the system's recommendations.
To validate their approach, the researchers conducted a case study using an XAI system for detecting pneumonia from chest X-ray images. They had human experts use the XAI system and then measured both the system's performance and the users' trust in its decisions.
The XAI system provided explanations for its pneumonia diagnoses, helping users understand the reasoning behind the automated decisions. By incorporating these trust signals alongside standard performance metrics, the researchers were able to get a more holistic assessment of the XAI system's effectiveness.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several limitations of their study, including the relatively small sample size and the specific medical domain. They suggest that further research is needed to generalize their trust metric to other XAI applications and user populations.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into potential biases or fairness issues that may arise in XAI systems, which is an important area for future investigation. As XAI systems become more prevalent, it will be crucial to ensure they are not perpetuating unfair or discriminatory decision-making.
Overall, the researchers have made a valuable contribution by proposing a novel approach to measuring user trust in XAI systems. This work represents an important step towards developing more transparent and trustworthy AI-powered applications, particularly in high-stakes domains like healthcare.
Conclusion
This paper presents a new method for evaluating user trust in eXplainable AI (XAI) systems, which are designed to provide insights into the reasoning behind automated decisions. By combining performance metrics and trust indicators, the researchers developed a more comprehensive approach to assessing the effectiveness of XAI systems.
The case study in the medical domain of pneumonia detection from X-ray images demonstrates the potential of this trust metric to help refine and improve XAI systems. As AI becomes more deeply integrated into our lives, building user confidence through transparency and explainability will be crucial for the widespread adoption and responsible use of these technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Can you trust your explanations? A robustness test for feature attribution methods
Ilaria Vascotto, Alex Rodriguez, Alessandro Bonaita, Luca Bortolussi
0
0
The increase of legislative concerns towards the usage of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has recently led to a series of regulations striving for a more transparent, trustworthy and accountable AI. Along with these proposals, the field of Explainable AI (XAI) has seen a rapid growth but the usage of its techniques has at times led to unexpected results. The robustness of the approaches is, in fact, a key property often overlooked: it is necessary to evaluate the stability of an explanation (to random and adversarial perturbations) to ensure that the results are trustable. To this end, we propose a test to evaluate the robustness to non-adversarial perturbations and an ensemble approach to analyse more in depth the robustness of XAI methods applied to neural networks and tabular datasets. We will show how leveraging manifold hypothesis and ensemble approaches can be beneficial to an in-depth analysis of the robustness.
6/21/2024
🎲
Trust in AI: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions
Saleh Afroogh, Ali Akbari, Evan Malone, Mohammadali Kargar, Hananeh Alambeigi
0
0
The increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in our daily life through various applications, services, and products explains the significance of trust/distrust in AI from a user perspective. AI-driven systems (as opposed to other technologies) have ubiquitously diffused in our life not only as some beneficial tools to be used by human agents but also are going to be substitutive agents on our behalf, or manipulative minds that would influence human thought, decision, and agency. Trust/distrust in AI plays the role of a regulator and could significantly control the level of this diffusion, as trust can increase, and distrust may reduce the rate of adoption of AI. Recently, varieties of studies have paid attention to the variant dimension of trust/distrust in AI, and its relevant considerations. In this systematic literature review, after conceptualization of trust in the current AI literature review, we will investigate trust in different types of human-Machine interaction, and its impact on technology acceptance in different domains. In addition to that, we propose a taxonomy of technical (i.e., safety, accuracy, robustness) and non-technical axiological (i.e., ethical, legal, and mixed) trustworthiness metrics, and some trustworthy measurements. Moreover, we examine some major trust-breakers in AI (e.g., autonomy and dignity threat), and trust makers; and propose some future directions and probable solutions for the transition to a trustworthy AI.
4/5/2024
🔎
Explainable Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Accurate Fault Detection and Diagnosis: A Review
Ahmed Maged, Salah Haridy, Herman Shen
0
0
As the manufacturing industry advances with sensor integration and automation, the opaque nature of deep learning models in machine learning poses a significant challenge for fault detection and diagnosis. And despite the related predictive insights Artificial Intelligence (AI) can deliver, advanced machine learning engines often remain a black box. This paper reviews the eXplainable AI (XAI) tools and techniques in this context. We explore various XAI methodologies, focusing on their role in making AI decision-making transparent, particularly in critical scenarios where humans are involved. We also discuss current limitations and potential future research that aims to balance explainability with model performance while improving trustworthiness in the context of AI applications for critical industrial use cases.
6/11/2024
Transferring Domain Knowledge with (X)AI-Based Learning Systems
Philipp Spitzer, Niklas Kuhl, Marc Goutier, Manuel Kaschura, Gerhard Satzger
0
0
In numerous high-stakes domains, training novices via conventional learning systems does not suffice. To impart tacit knowledge, experts' hands-on guidance is imperative. However, training novices by experts is costly and time-consuming, increasing the need for alternatives. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has conventionally been used to make black-box artificial intelligence systems interpretable. In this work, we utilize XAI as an alternative: An (X)AI system is trained on experts' past decisions and is then employed to teach novices by providing examples coupled with explanations. In a study with 249 participants, we measure the effectiveness of such an approach for a classification task. We show that (X)AI-based learning systems are able to induce learning in novices and that their cognitive styles moderate learning. Thus, we take the first steps to reveal the impact of XAI on human learning and point AI developers to future options to tailor the design of (X)AI-based learning systems.
6/4/2024