Investigating the impact of virtual element misalignment in collaborative Augmented Reality experiences
2404.09174
0
0
Abstract
The collaboration in co-located shared environments has sparked an increased interest in immersive technologies, including Augmented Reality (AR). Since research in this field has primarily focused on individual user experiences in AR, the collaborative aspects within shared AR spaces remain less explored, and fewer studies can provide guidelines for designing this type of experience. This article investigates how the user experience in a collaborative shared AR space is affected by divergent perceptions of virtual objects and the effects of positional synchrony and avatars. For this purpose, we developed an AR app and used two distinct experimental conditions to study the influencing factors. Forty-eight participants, organized into 24 pairs, participated in the experiment and jointly interacted with shared virtual objects. Results indicate that divergent perceptions of virtual objects did not directly influence communication and collaboration dynamics. Conversely, positional synchrony emerged as a critical factor, significantly enhancing the quality of the collaborative experience. On the contrary, while not negligible, avatars played a relatively less pronounced role in influencing these dynamics. The findings can potentially offer valuable practical insights, guiding the development of future collaborative AR/VR environments.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the impact of virtual element misalignment in collaborative Augmented Reality (AR) experiences.
- It examines how misalignment between virtual objects and the real-world environment can affect user perception and performance in shared AR settings.
- The researchers conducted experiments to understand the effects of different types and levels of misalignment on user experience and collaboration.
Plain English Explanation
Augmented Reality (AR) allows virtual objects to be overlaid on the real world, creating the illusion that they are part of the user's environment. In collaborative AR experiences, multiple people can view and interact with the same virtual elements. However, if these virtual elements are not perfectly aligned with the real-world surroundings, it can cause issues.
This paper looks at what happens when there is a mismatch, or "misalignment," between the virtual objects and the physical environment that users are seeing. The researchers wanted to understand how various types and degrees of misalignment impact the user experience and the ability of people to work together effectively in an AR setting.
To investigate this, they set up experiments where participants used AR technology to collaborate on a task. The researchers varied the level of misalignment between the virtual content and the real-world view, and then measured factors like how accurately users could interact with the virtual objects, how well they could communicate and coordinate with each other, and their overall sense of immersion and presence in the shared AR environment.
By studying the effects of virtual element misalignment, the researchers hope to provide insights that can help improve the design and implementation of collaborative AR experiences, ensuring users can work together effectively and intuitively within these mixed reality environments.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines the impact of virtual element misalignment in collaborative Augmented Reality (AR) environments. It investigates how different types and levels of misalignment between virtual content and the real-world surroundings can affect user perception, performance, and collaboration in shared AR experiences.
The researchers conducted a series of experiments where participants worked together on a task using AR technology. They manipulated the degree of misalignment between the virtual elements and the physical environment, measuring factors such as:
- Interaction accuracy: How precisely users could select and manipulate the virtual objects
- Communication and coordination: The effectiveness of collaboration between participants
- Sense of presence and immersion: The users' overall feeling of being part of the shared AR experience
The findings suggest that even small amounts of misalignment can significantly degrade user performance and the quality of collaboration. Larger misalignments further exacerbate these issues, leading to increased user frustration and a reduced sense of being present in the shared virtual-physical environment.
The paper provides important insights into the critical role of spatial alignment in collaborative AR experiences. The results highlight the need for accurate registration and calibration of virtual content to ensure seamless integration with the real world. This is a key consideration for the design and deployment of effective shared AR systems, particularly in domains like [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/spatial-assisted-human-drone-collaborative-navigation-interaction] collaborative navigation, [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/i-did-not-notice-comparison-immersive-analytics] data visualization, and [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/change-scenery-transformative-insights-from-retrospective-vr] training and education.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-designed investigation of virtual element misalignment in collaborative AR experiences. The experimental methodology is sound, and the measurements cover key aspects of user perception and performance.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations and areas for further research. For example, the experiments were conducted in a controlled laboratory setting, and it's unclear how the findings would translate to more complex, real-world collaborative AR scenarios. Additionally, the study focused on a specific type of collaborative task, and the impact of misalignment may vary for different types of collaborative activities.
Furthermore, the paper does not explore the potential for users to adapt and compensate for misalignment over time, or the role of individual differences in users' spatial awareness and AR experience. These factors could influence the severity of the observed effects and suggest additional design considerations for collaborative AR systems.
[internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/exploring-physiological-responses-virtual-reality-based-interventions] Incorporating physiological measures, such as [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/extended-reality-mental-health-evaluation-scoping-review] user stress and cognitive load, could also provide deeper insights into the user experience and reveal additional implications of virtual element misalignment.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to understanding the importance of spatial alignment in collaborative AR. However, further research is needed to explore the broader implications and practical applications of these findings.
Conclusion
This paper investigates the impact of virtual element misalignment in collaborative Augmented Reality (AR) experiences. The researchers conducted experiments to understand how different types and levels of misalignment between virtual content and the real-world environment affect user perception, performance, and collaboration.
The findings suggest that even small amounts of misalignment can significantly degrade user experience, leading to reduced interaction accuracy, less effective communication and coordination, and a diminished sense of presence and immersion in the shared AR environment. Larger misalignments further exacerbate these issues, highlighting the critical importance of accurate spatial registration and integration of virtual elements in collaborative AR systems.
These insights have important implications for the design and deployment of effective shared AR experiences, particularly in domains where seamless virtual-physical integration and intuitive collaboration are essential, such as [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/spatial-assisted-human-drone-collaborative-navigation-interaction] navigation, [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/i-did-not-notice-comparison-immersive-analytics] data visualization, and [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/change-scenery-transformative-insights-from-retrospective-vr] training and education. By understanding the impact of virtual element misalignment, researchers and designers can work to improve the user experience and enable more natural and effective collaboration in mixed-reality environments.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
SPARC: Shared Perspective with Avatar Distortion for Remote Collaboration in VR
Jo~ao Sim~oes, Anderson Maciel, Catarina Moreira, Joaquim Jorge
0
0
Telepresence VR systems allow for face-to-face communication, promoting the feeling of presence and understanding of nonverbal cues. However, when discussing virtual 3D objects, limitations to presence and communication cause deictic gestures to lose meaning due to disparities in orientation. Current approaches use shared perspective, and avatar overlap to restore these references, which cause occlusions and discomfort that worsen when multiple users participate. We introduce a new approach to shared perspective in multi-user collaboration where the avatars are not co-located. Each person sees the others' avatars at their positions around the workspace while having a first-person view of the workspace. Whenever a user manipulates an object, others will see his/her arms stretching to reach that object in their perspective. SPARC combines a shared orientation and supports nonverbal communication, minimizing occlusions. We conducted a user study (n=18) to understand how the novel approach impacts task performance and workspace awareness. We found evidence that SPARC is more efficient and less mentally demanding than life-like settings.
6/11/2024
Perception in Pixels: Understanding Avatar Representation in Video-Mediated Collaborative Interactions
Pitch Sinlapanuntakul, Mark Zachry
0
0
Despite the abundance of research concerning virtual reality (VR) avatars, the impact of screen-based or augmented reality (AR) avatars for real-world applications remain relatively unexplored. Notably, there is a lack of research examining video-mediated collaborative interaction experiences using AR avatars for goal-directed group activities. This study bridges this gap with a mixed-methods, quasi-experimental user study that investigates video-based small-group interactions when employing AR avatars as opposed to traditional video for user representation. We found that the use of avatars positively influenced self-esteem and video-based collaboration satisfaction. In addition, our group interview findings highlight experiences and perceptions regarding the dynamic use of avatars in video-mediated collaborative interactions, including benefits, challenges, and factors that would influence a decision to use avatars. This study contributes an empirical understanding of avatar representation in mediating video-based collaborative interactions, implications and perceptions surrounding the adoption of AR avatars, and a comprehensive comparison of key characteristics between user representations.
5/8/2024
📉
The Impact of Social Environment and Interaction Focus on User Experience and Social Acceptability of an Augmented Reality Game
Lorenzo Cocchia, Maurizio Vergari, Tanja Kojic, Francesco Vona, Sebastian Moller, Franca Garzotto, Jan-Niklas Voigt-Antons
0
0
One of the most promising technologies inside the Extended Reality (XR) spectrum is Augmented Reality. This technology is already in people's pockets regarding Mobile Augmented Reality with their smartphones. The scientific community still needs answers about how humans could and should interact in environments where perceived stimuli are different from fully physical or digital circumstances. Moreover, it is still being determined if people accept these new technologies in different social environments and interaction settings or if some obstacles could exist. This paper explores the impact of the Social Environment and the Focus of social interaction on users while playing a location-based augmented reality game, measuring it with user experience and social acceptance indicators. An empirical study in a within-subject fashion was performed in different social environments and under different settings of social interaction focus with N = 28 participants compiling self-reported questionnaires after playing a Scavenger Hunt in Augmented Reality. The measures from two different Social Environments (Crowded vs. Uncrowded) resulted in statistically relevant mean differences with indicators from the Social Acceptability dimension. Moreover, the analyses show statistically relevant differences between the variances from different degrees of Social Interaction Focus with Overall Social Presence, Perceived Psychological Engagement, Perceived Attentional Engagement, and Perceived Emotional Contagion. The results suggest that a location-based AR game played in different social environments and settings can influence the user experience's social dimension. Therefore, they should be carefully considered while designing immersive technological experiences in public spaces involving social interactions between players.
4/26/2024
I Did Not Notice: A Comparison of Immersive Analytics with Augmented and Virtual Reality
Xiaoyan Zhou, Anil Ufuk Batmaz, Adam S. Williams, Dylan Schreiber, Francisco Ortega
0
0
Immersive environments enable users to engage in embodied interaction, enhancing the sensemaking processes involved in completing tasks such as immersive analytics. Previous comparative studies on immersive analytics using augmented and virtual realities have revealed that users employ different strategies for data interpretation and text-based analytics depending on the environment. Our study seeks to investigate how augmented and virtual reality influences sensemaking processes in quantitative immersive analytics. Our results, derived from a diverse group of participants, indicate that users demonstrate comparable performance in both environments. However, it was observed that users exhibit a higher tolerance for cognitive load in VR and travel further in AR. Based on our findings, we recommend providing users with the option to switch between AR and VR, thereby enabling them to select an environment that aligns with their preferences and task requirements.
4/8/2024