Investigating Mysteries of CoT-Augmented Distillation
2406.14511
0
0
Abstract
Eliciting chain of thought (CoT) rationales -- sequences of token that convey a reasoning process -- has been shown to consistently improve LLM performance on tasks like question answering. More recent efforts have shown that such rationales can also be used for model distillation: Including CoT sequences (elicited from a large teacher model) in addition to target labels when fine-tuning a small student model yields (often substantial) improvements. In this work we ask: Why and how does this additional training signal help in model distillation? We perform ablations to interrogate this, and report some potentially surprising results. Specifically: (1) Placing CoT sequences after labels (rather than before) realizes consistently better downstream performance -- this means that no student reasoning is necessary at test time to realize gains. (2) When rationales are appended in this way, they need not be coherent reasoning sequences to yield improvements; performance increases are robust to permutations of CoT tokens, for example. In fact, (3) a small number of key tokens are sufficient to achieve improvements equivalent to those observed when full rationales are used in model distillation.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates the mysteries behind a technique called "CoT-Augmented Distillation", which aims to improve the reasoning and generalization abilities of smaller AI models by learning from the step-by-step explanations of larger models.
- The paper explores the key factors that contribute to the success of this approach and provides insights into how it can be further improved.
Plain English Explanation
CoT-Augmented Distillation is a method that allows smaller AI models to learn from the step-by-step reasoning processes of larger, more capable models. The idea is that by understanding the logical steps the larger model uses to arrive at its answers, the smaller model can develop stronger reasoning and generalization skills.
The paper examines this technique in depth, looking at things like the architecture of the models, the training process, and the types of tasks the models are tested on. The researchers found that there are several important factors that contribute to the success of CoT-Augmented Distillation, such as the quality and structure of the explanations provided by the larger model, and the ability of the smaller model to effectively learn from and apply those explanations.
Overall, this research provides valuable insights into how we can build more capable and versatile AI systems by leveraging the knowledge and reasoning abilities of larger models. By understanding the key elements that make CoT-Augmented Distillation effective, we can work towards developing AI assistants that not only provide accurate answers, but can also explain their thinking in a way that is clear and helpful to users.
Technical Explanation
The paper explores the concept of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) Augmented Distillation, a technique that aims to improve the reasoning and generalization abilities of smaller AI models by learning from the step-by-step explanations of larger models.
The experimental design involves training a larger "teacher" model to not only provide answers, but also generate step-by-step explanations for those answers using a Chain-of-Thought (CoT) approach. This teacher model is then used to train a smaller "student" model, which learns not only the final answers, but also the underlying reasoning process.
The researchers test this approach on a variety of tasks, including math word problems and open-ended question answering. They find that the student models trained with CoT-Augmented Distillation demonstrate improved reasoning and generalization abilities compared to models trained using traditional methods.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough exploration of the CoT-Augmented Distillation approach and its potential benefits. However, it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research:
-
The effectiveness of the approach may depend heavily on the quality and structure of the explanations provided by the teacher model. More work is needed to understand how to generate high-quality, informative explanations that can be effectively learned by the student model.
-
The paper focuses on relatively simple tasks like math word problems and open-ended QA. It's unclear how well the CoT-Augmented Distillation approach would scale to more complex, real-world tasks that require more nuanced reasoning and decision-making.
-
The training process for the CoT-Augmented Distillation approach is more computationally intensive than traditional distillation methods. Further research is needed to optimize the efficiency of the training process.
-
The paper does not explore the potential for the CoT-Augmented Distillation approach to be combined with other techniques, such as learning to maximize mutual information between inputs and chain-of-thought steps, which could potentially enhance its effectiveness even further.
Conclusion
Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into the potential of the CoT-Augmented Distillation approach to improve the reasoning and generalization abilities of smaller AI models. By leveraging the step-by-step explanations of larger models, this technique offers a promising path towards the development of more capable and transparent AI systems that can better assist and collaborate with human users.
While the paper identifies several areas for further research and refinement, the core concept of using explanatory knowledge to enhance model performance is a compelling one that deserves further exploration and development.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Improve Student's Reasoning Generalizability through Cascading Decomposed CoTs Distillation
Chengwei Dai, Kun Li, Wei Zhou, Songlin Hu
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit enhanced reasoning at larger scales, driving efforts to distill these capabilities into smaller models via teacher-student learning. Previous works simply fine-tune student models on teachers' generated Chain-of-Thoughts (CoTs) data. Although these methods enhance in-domain (IND) reasoning performance, they struggle to generalize to out-of-domain (OOD) tasks. We believe that the widespread spurious correlations between questions and answers may lead the model to preset a specific answer which restricts the diversity and generalizability of its reasoning process. In this paper, we propose Cascading Decomposed CoTs Distillation (CasCoD) to address these issues by decomposing the traditional single-step learning process into two cascaded learning steps. Specifically, by restructuring the training objectives -- removing the answer from outputs and concatenating the question with the rationale as input -- CasCoD's two-step learning process ensures that students focus on learning rationales without interference from the preset answers, thus improving reasoning generalizability. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of CasCoD on both IND and OOD benchmark reasoning datasets. Code can be found at https://github.com/C-W-D/CasCoD.
5/31/2024
Symbolic Chain-of-Thought Distillation: Small Models Can Also Think Step-by-Step
Liunian Harold Li, Jack Hessel, Youngjae Yu, Xiang Ren, Kai-Wei Chang, Yejin Choi
0
0
Chain-of-thought prompting (e.g., Let's think step-by-step) primes large language models to verbalize rationalization for their predictions. While chain-of-thought can lead to dramatic performance gains, benefits appear to emerge only for sufficiently large models (beyond 50B parameters). We show that orders-of-magnitude smaller models (125M -- 1.3B parameters) can still benefit from chain-of-thought prompting. To achieve this, we introduce Symbolic Chain-of-Thought Distillation (SCoTD), a method to train a smaller student model on rationalizations sampled from a significantly larger teacher model. Experiments across several commonsense benchmarks show that: 1) SCoTD enhances the performance of the student model in both supervised and few-shot settings, and especially for challenge sets; 2) sampling many reasoning chains per instance from the teacher is paramount; and 3) after distillation, student chain-of-thoughts are judged by humans as comparable to the teacher, despite orders of magnitude fewer parameters. We test several hypotheses regarding what properties of chain-of-thought samples are important, e.g., diversity vs. teacher likelihood vs. open-endedness. We release our corpus of chain-of-thought samples and code.
4/17/2024
Beyond Imitation: Learning Key Reasoning Steps from Dual Chain-of-Thoughts in Reasoning Distillation
Chengwei Dai, Kun Li, Wei Zhou, Songlin Hu
0
0
As Large Language Models (LLMs) scale up and gain powerful Chain-of-Thoughts (CoTs) reasoning abilities, practical resource constraints drive efforts to distill these capabilities into more compact Smaller Language Models (SLMs). We find that CoTs consist mainly of simple reasoning forms, with a small proportion ($approx 4.7%$) of key reasoning steps that truly impact conclusions. However, previous distillation methods typically involve supervised fine-tuning student SLMs only on correct CoTs data produced by teacher LLMs, resulting in students struggling to learn the key reasoning steps, instead imitating the teacher's reasoning forms and making errors or omissions on these steps. To address these issues, drawing an analogy to human learning, where analyzing mistakes according to correct solutions often reveals the crucial steps leading to successes or failures, we propose mistaktextbf{E}-textbf{D}riven key reasontextbf{I}ng step distillatextbf{T}ion (textbf{EDIT}), a novel method that further aids SLMs learning key reasoning steps rather than mere simple fine-tuning. Firstly, to expose these crucial steps in CoTs, we design specific prompts to generate dual CoTs data with similar reasoning paths but divergent conclusions. Then, we apply the minimum edit distance algorithm on the dual CoTs data to locate these key steps and optimize the likelihood of these steps. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of EDIT across both in-domain and out-of-domain benchmark reasoning datasets. Further analysis shows that EDIT can generate high-quality CoTs with more correct key reasoning steps. Notably, we also explore how different mistake patterns affect performance and find that EDIT benefits more from logical errors than from knowledge or mathematical calculation errors in dual CoTsfootnote{Code can be found at url{https://github.com/C-W-D/EDIT}}.
5/31/2024
🌿
Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Without Prompting
Xuezhi Wang, Denny Zhou
0
0
In enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), prior research primarily focuses on specific prompting techniques such as few-shot or zero-shot chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting. These methods, while effective, often involve manually intensive prompt engineering. Our study takes a novel approach by asking: Can LLMs reason effectively without prompting? Our findings reveal that, intriguingly, CoT reasoning paths can be elicited from pre-trained LLMs by simply altering the textit{decoding} process. Rather than conventional greedy decoding, we investigate the top-$k$ alternative tokens, uncovering that CoT paths are frequently inherent in these sequences. This approach not only bypasses the confounders of prompting but also allows us to assess the LLMs' textit{intrinsic} reasoning abilities. Moreover, we observe that the presence of a CoT in the decoding path correlates with a higher confidence in the model's decoded answer. This confidence metric effectively differentiates between CoT and non-CoT paths. Extensive empirical studies on various reasoning benchmarks show that the proposed CoT-decoding effectively elicits reasoning capabilities from language models, which were previously obscured by standard greedy decoding.
5/27/2024